Defending the Truth

NASA, accused of censoring its scientists on global warming and the origin of the universe, pledged on Wednesday to reform its policies to ensure "open and full communications."

The move followed more than a week of revelations in The New York Times and on the Internet about internal tussles between NASA writers and researchers and the U.S. space agency's public affairs office at its Washington headquarters.

A key figure in the controversy, George Deutsch, resigned on Tuesday. He had told NASA writers in an e-mail to refer to the Big Bang as a "theory" because NASA should not discount "intelligent design by a creator."

The Times and the http://www.scientificactivist.blogspot.com Web site reported that Deutsch, who worked on President George W. Bush's 2004 re-election campaign, lied about his college degree.

"The theory that the universe was created by a 'big bang' is just that -- a theory," Deutsch wrote in an e-mail on October 17, 2005, which was obtained by Reuters. "It is not proven fact; it is opinion. Yes, the scientific community by and large may share this opinion, but that doesn't make it correct ... .

"It is not NASA's place, nor should it be, to make a declaration such as this about the existence of the universe that discounts intelligent design by a creator -- the other half of the argument," the e-mail continued.

Most scientists believe that a monster explosion, the Big Bang, gave birth to the universe.

The e-mail appeared to conform to Bush's views on the debate over intelligent design and the theory of evolution, as he said last August: "Both sides ought to be properly taught ... so people can understand what the debate is about."

'WATERED-DOWN' SCIENCE?

NASA spokesman Dean Acosta confirmed on Wednesday that Deutsch's resignation had been accepted, and added in an e-mail, "As we have stated in the past, NASA is in the process of revising our public affairs policies across the agency to ensure our commitment to open and full communications."

This was in line with a statement issued last Saturday by NASA Administrator Michael Griffin.

"The job of the Office of Public Affairs, at every level in NASA, is to convey the work done at NASA to our stakeholders in an intelligible way," Griffin wrote. "It is not the job of public affairs officers to alter, filter or adjust engineering or scientific material produced by NASA's technical staff."

Besides the question over NASA's description of the Big Bang, climate scientists and those who write about their work at NASA said reports on global warming were "constantly watered down" to minimize the connection to the burning of fossil fuels and other human-made pollution.

One scientist, James Hansen of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City, was quoted as saying in a New York Times story last month that the Bush administration had tried to stop him from speaking out after he called publicly for reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases linked to global warming.

"They feel their job is to be this censor of information going out to the public," Hansen said in the Times article.

A call and e-mail to Hansen on Wednesday were not immediately returned.

Astronomer Phil Plait, who runs the badastronomy.com Web site, was incensed over Deutsch's actions.

"There are so many issues about the Deutsch affair that it's hard to know which one to be most outraged about," Plait said in an e-mail. "But I suspect that in the long run it's the culture of anti-scientific attitudes, the suppression of science, that's the most disturbing and the most damaging."

By Deborah Zabarenko


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060208/sc_nm/space_nasa_dc

__________________________________________________ __________
We are that much closer to announcing the already scientifically accepted conclusion that we evolved. If Bush would stay out of the Public Affairs Game we could really start being honest with the world on the facts that we already scientifically know, but are afraid to admit(evolution included)!
Admitting the Big Bang is more than theory is a start!!

Government has to be careful of what its scientists say. Science is ever changing, many of the beliefs of today have disproved the former beliefs of science. Many times when someone who works for government speaks their words have much more weight than that of other organizations.

Government is a powerful tool, it has to be careful in releasing information, especially when that information can and has been interpretted in different ways by others. Government should not be the end all and say all in science. Scientist who work for the government often realize that because of their position that they have to be careful of what they say, if they are unhappy with this reality, then they should work elsewhere.

The Big Bang is just a theory, while it is supported by the facts and current science, who is to say in a decade a new theory that has just as much science does not change what is believed? Once upon a time the science community believed that the universe was compacting, and they had the science to prove it as well. What a difference a few years can make.

dmk

Good points!