Defending the Truth

  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Branches of Government

Branches of Government Debate topics of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of Government.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2006, 02:42 PM   #41 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
onlyoneplanet's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 505
Points: 3,615, Level: 37
Points: 3,615, Level: 37 Points: 3,615, Level: 37 Points: 3,615, Level: 37
Level up: 77%, 35 Points needed
Level up: 77% Level up: 77% Level up: 77%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to onlyoneplanet
onlyoneplanet is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
GM foods haven't shown any adverse effects, and we've been eating the lab sort for thirty years. You'd think something serious would have happened?
Like having the highest cancer rate in the world?


I have had organic milk and regular milk in a side by side taste test. It is like night and day.
Obviously, vegitables cut with bacteria that we consume on a regular basis anyway are giving us cancer. Obviously. Forget about higher consumptions of fried, fatty foods. Forget increased television watching. Forget higher amounts of heavy metals and arsenic in the drinking water. Forget the fact that Americans are eating more and exercising less. Nooo... It has to be GM foods.
The point is you cannot discount GM foods as a potential source that contributes to cancer because NOONE KNOWS the actual effects on humans. It may very well be safe but we need long term studies to back this up before we are turned into fucking guinea pigs.
Not to mention the fat cat companies are making the third world dependant on their products (as a result of the self-terminating gene), and there's also the risk of contaminating the natural environment.

And let's face it, nature simply didn't intend it. Some of the mutations that are created as a result of genetic testing are downright creepy. It's just sad.
\"Are we justified in using articles, no matter how convenient it may be for us to use them, that we know were produced in conditions which bored and even stultified the human beings who had to make them?\"
-John Seymour
Sponsored Links
Old 02-24-2006, 03:28 PM   #42 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,363
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by onlyoneplanet
Not to mention the fat cat companies are making the third world dependant on their products (as a result of the self-terminating gene), and there's also the risk of contaminating the natural environment.

And let's face it, nature simply didn't intend it. Some of the mutations that are created as a result of genetic testing are downright creepy. It's just sad.


That's BS. You really need to provide a CREDIBLE link for that.

Old 02-24-2006, 04:41 PM   #43 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
onlyoneplanet's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 505
Points: 3,615, Level: 37
Points: 3,615, Level: 37 Points: 3,615, Level: 37 Points: 3,615, Level: 37
Level up: 77%, 35 Points needed
Level up: 77% Level up: 77% Level up: 77%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to onlyoneplanet
onlyoneplanet is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
Quote:
Originally Posted by onlyoneplanet
Not to mention the fat cat companies are making the third world dependant on their products (as a result of the self-terminating gene), and there's also the risk of contaminating the natural environment.

And let's face it, nature simply didn't intend it. Some of the mutations that are created as a result of genetic testing are downright creepy. It's just sad.


That's BS. You really need to provide a CREDIBLE link for that.

Sure thing. It all depends on what you consider credible, but I'll give you a few.

http://www.zmag.org/ZMag/mar26shah.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/339240.stm
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=3325
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/1998...-sells-hunger/
\"Are we justified in using articles, no matter how convenient it may be for us to use them, that we know were produced in conditions which bored and even stultified the human beings who had to make them?\"
-John Seymour
Old 02-24-2006, 05:25 PM   #44 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,363
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by onlyoneplanet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
Quote:
Originally Posted by onlyoneplanet
Not to mention the fat cat companies are making the third world dependant on their products (as a result of the self-terminating gene), and there's also the risk of contaminating the natural environment.

And let's face it, nature simply didn't intend it. Some of the mutations that are created as a result of genetic testing are downright creepy. It's just sad.


That's BS. You really need to provide a CREDIBLE link for that.

Sure thing. It all depends on what you consider credible, but I'll give you a few.

http://www.zmag.org/ZMag/mar26shah.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/339240.stm
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=3325
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/1998...-sells-hunger/
Gotcha. And I pretty much knew you'd put up those links - or at least several like them.

I want to remind you that ALL of those sites use terms like "allege" and "fear" and "accuse". In addition, some of what they report is outright false. The article by Sonia Shah is blatantly false. The lady is an idiot!

I also want to remind you that my whole family is in agriculture and farming.

Here's the deal on these "scandalous" hybrids that American companies are SUPPOSEDLY using to starve third-world children to death: You CAN plant seed corn (or just about any other crop) right out of the bin. However, "bin-run seed" will NEVER produce more than about one-fourth the yield that hybrid seed produces. This past year, most of the farmers in my part of the country saw corn yields of OVER 200 bushels per acre (it was a great year). The few farmers who REFUSE to "support those corporations" and decided to plant bin-run seed got NO MORE THAN 50 bushels per acre. That is how hybrid genetics have ALWAYS worked. It is NOT a new development, and it is NOT some scandalous conspiracy.

So I ask you: Would poor farmers in India be better off planting corn that could yield them 5 bushels per acre, or 150 bushels per acre off the same ground? IF they are starving, this is a no-brainer!

In addition, the Monsanto Corporation developed what is known as "RoundUp Ready" Seed. You can plant it, then spray right over it with RoundUp - a herbicide that kills EVERYTHING - except crops that have been "genetically modified" to resist the RoundUp herbicide. This was one of the greatest developments, in recent times, for American farmers. However, before he can buy this RoundUp Ready Seed, a farmer MUST sign a contract agreeing that he will NOT plant "2nd Generation" or "bin-run" RoundUp Ready seed. Some farmers have been sued, by Monsanto, because after they signed the contract, they planted bin-run seed anyway.

My father - who is still farming even though he's 70 - has planted RoundUp Ready Seed for YEARS. He has had NO problems of any kind. In fact, it is an EXCELLENT resource.


The people that put up these blog-sites REALLY need to do more research into the genetics of all this before they post stuff that leads gullible people astray.
Old 02-24-2006, 05:32 PM   #45 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Posts: 8,493
Points: 27,119, Level: 97
Points: 27,119, Level: 97 Points: 27,119, Level: 97 Points: 27,119, Level: 97
Level up: 77%, 231 Points needed
Level up: 77% Level up: 77% Level up: 77%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
I can't believe someone actually just defended spraying food with herbicide as being a positive thing. This is exactly what is wrong with the logic of modern American farmers.

$$$$$$ over people in a capitalist society. Highest cancer rates in the world.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

"There is no such thing as laziness. Laziness is only lack of incentive." Norman Reider, MD

Morality is not contingent on religion to exist. Therefore religion only detracts from the purity of morality.
Old 02-24-2006, 05:40 PM   #46 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,363
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
I can't believe someone actually just defended spraying food with herbicide as being a positive thing. This is exactly what is wrong with the logic of modern American farmers.

$$$$$$ over people in a capitalist society. Highest cancer rates in the world.
I'm really sorry you have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to agriculture.

FAMILY GENETICS have 10 times more to do with your likelihood of getting cancer than ANYTHING ELSE. In fact, it's more than everything else combined.

Now... next time you go buy your "organic" tomatoes, you might want to consider the FACT that they are FAR MORE LIKELY to be carrying bacteria and viruses because they are NOT sprayed. So enjoy those diseased tomatoes! Yum yum!
Old 02-24-2006, 05:55 PM   #47 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
tyreay's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 2,909
Points: 15,029, Level: 79
Points: 15,029, Level: 79 Points: 15,029, Level: 79 Points: 15,029, Level: 79
Level up: 36%, 321 Points needed
Level up: 36% Level up: 36% Level up: 36%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to tyreay
tyreay is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Now your a biochemist? The herbicides are running off into the ocean and killing everything. Herbicides do cause cancer and if you doubt it go do some research, then show us some links. You have none because your view is conjecture.
Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour

There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. ~Alexis de Tocqueville
Old 02-24-2006, 06:24 PM   #48 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,363
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyreay
Now your a biochemist? The herbicides are running off into the ocean and killing everything. Herbicides do cause cancer and if you doubt it go do some research, then show us some links. You have none because your view is conjecture.
Nope, not a biochemist.

Give me some evidence that "herbicides are running off into the ocean and killing everything".


...and if you actually cared to read my post (which obviously you did NOT), I said that heredity is the #1 cause of cancer. I did NOT say that nothing else causes it.


But you do keep crying and screaming. It's helping you feel better!
Old 02-24-2006, 06:57 PM   #49 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
onlyoneplanet's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 505
Points: 3,615, Level: 37
Points: 3,615, Level: 37 Points: 3,615, Level: 37 Points: 3,615, Level: 37
Level up: 77%, 35 Points needed
Level up: 77% Level up: 77% Level up: 77%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to onlyoneplanet
onlyoneplanet is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
Quote:
Originally Posted by onlyoneplanet
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
Quote:
Originally Posted by onlyoneplanet
Not to mention the fat cat companies are making the third world dependant on their products (as a result of the self-terminating gene), and there's also the risk of contaminating the natural environment.

And let's face it, nature simply didn't intend it. Some of the mutations that are created as a result of genetic testing are downright creepy. It's just sad.


That's BS. You really need to provide a CREDIBLE link for that.

Sure thing. It all depends on what you consider credible, but I'll give you a few.

http://www.zmag.org/ZMag/mar26shah.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/339240.stm
http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=3325
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/1998...-sells-hunger/
Gotcha. And I pretty much knew you'd put up those links - or at least several like them.

I want to remind you that ALL of those sites use terms like "allege" and "fear" and "accuse". In addition, some of what they report is outright false. The article by Sonia Shah is blatantly false. The lady is an idiot!

I also want to remind you that my whole family is in agriculture and farming.

Here's the deal on these "scandalous" hybrids that American companies are SUPPOSEDLY using to starve third-world children to death: You CAN plant seed corn (or just about any other crop) right out of the bin. However, "bin-run seed" will NEVER produce more than about one-fourth the yield that hybrid seed produces. This past year, most of the farmers in my part of the country saw corn yields of OVER 200 bushels per acre (it was a great year). The few farmers who REFUSE to "support those corporations" and decided to plant bin-run seed got NO MORE THAN 50 bushels per acre. That is how hybrid genetics have ALWAYS worked. It is NOT a new development, and it is NOT some scandalous conspiracy.

So I ask you: Would poor farmers in India be better off planting corn that could yield them 5 bushels per acre, or 150 bushels per acre off the same ground? IF they are starving, this is a no-brainer!

In addition, the Monsanto Corporation developed what is known as "RoundUp Ready" Seed. You can plant it, then spray right over it with RoundUp - a herbicide that kills EVERYTHING - except crops that have been "genetically modified" to resist the RoundUp herbicide. This was one of the greatest developments, in recent times, for American farmers. However, before he can buy this RoundUp Ready Seed, a farmer MUST sign a contract agreeing that he will NOT plant "2nd Generation" or "bin-run" RoundUp Ready seed. Some farmers have been sued, by Monsanto, because after they signed the contract, they planted bin-run seed anyway.

My father - who is still farming even though he's 70 - has planted RoundUp Ready Seed for YEARS. He has had NO problems of any kind. In fact, it is an EXCELLENT resource.


The people that put up these blog-sites REALLY need to do more research into the genetics of all this before they post stuff that leads gullible people astray.
You're ignoring many points that those articles made, and aside from that, you basically just steered the argument in a different direction.

What we're talking about here is dependency on Monsanto's products. Since Monsanto is patenting native crops, third world farmers can't plant them without buying them from Monsanto. These patents are abstract, they mean absolutely nothing to farming, yet they're forcing farmers to pay for the seeds they used to plant for free.

Can you please prove to me that this is false?

In addition to that, Monsanto's terminator gene ensures the crops' sterility, so after one season, the farmers buying these self-terminating crops have to come back for more.

Can you please prove to me that this is false?

The law of demand will have farmers in the third world investing in Monsanto's GM crops, and this is the most economical choice since their local seed companies have been bought, and their native seeds have been patented.

So I ask you: Will poor farmers ever develope their own means of creating food stability using their own natural, native crops, or will their dependancy on Monsanto only grow? If they are starving, this is a no-brainer!

It's a catch 22.

Also consider that the problem of famine has more to do with distribution of food rather than how much food a crop produces. There's plenty of food to feed the world, but who's buying it? The real issue, when it comes to famine, is poverty.

Also, if all the land used to grow animal feed, or graze animals was used to grow food for people, we could grow three times as much food. Unfortunately, that's all wasted to feed slaughter-bound cows, pigs, and poultry--half of which is wasted anyway since meat putrefies so quickly.
\"Are we justified in using articles, no matter how convenient it may be for us to use them, that we know were produced in conditions which bored and even stultified the human beings who had to make them?\"
-John Seymour
Old 02-24-2006, 07:29 PM   #50 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,363
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Oh good lord, you've got it so so so backwards!

Any 3rd world farmer CAN SAVE BACK HIS OWN SEED. The question is whether or not it is worth it.


And what do you propose happens to the hundreds of millions of cattle and hogs that are now being raised for slaughter? Turn them loose? Let them run wild?

Unbelievable!
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites