Defending the Truth

This site dispells some of the political garbage that has been put out about our President.


http://bushwatch.tripod.com/

tripod.com ??

here you go hev
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theconservativemajority/

Let's start with the lies bush has been spreading & the truth's!

Where's bin Laden........
For your future reference, here's what Bush has said about bin Laden at various points in time, depending on how he was trying to spin things:
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- G.W. Bush, 9/13/01
"I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'"
- G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI
"...Secondly, he is not escaping us. This is a guy, who, three months ago, was in control of a county [sic]. Now he's maybe in control of a cave. He's on the run. Listen, a while ago I said to the American people, our objective is more than bin Laden. But one of the things for certain is we're going to get him running and keep him running, and bring him to justice. And that's what's happening. He's on the run, if he's running at all. So we don't know whether he's in cave with the door shut, or a cave with the door open -- we just don't know...."
- Bush, in remarks in a Press Availability with the Press Travel Pool,
The Prairie Chapel Ranch, Crawford TX, 12/28/01, as reported on
official White House site
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, responding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
—"Because he's hiding…" Bush, explaining why Osama bin Laden has yet to be captured. (Washington Post interview, Jan. 16, 2005)

http://www.dubyaspeak.com/dim.phtml

Bush Planned Iraq 'Regime Change' Before Becoming President
http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle1221.htm

The repulsian crap!
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/152/story_15297_1.html

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publ...icle_441.shtml

---------------------------------
“If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy” ---James Madison 4th U.S. president (1809 -1817), and one of the founding fathers of this country. (1751- 1836)

As people do better, they start voting like Republicans - unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing” ---Karl Rove

--------------------
Let U.S. Pray!
Please dear Lord don't let the republicans destroy the eath on their way down!

That sure didn't take long!

Somebody posts something in defense of the President, and the Bush-haters just cannot contain their rage.

Interesting...

That's because they are so open-minded...you know how libs are..

Wow!

intangible child points out that Bush no longer sees Bin Laden's apprehension as a priority.

Jefferson throws out the name "Bush hater".
(Just out of curiousity, is calling somebody a name an argument?)

ANI then sarcastically makes innuendo that this has somehow shown that "libs" are not "open-minded"...


Does anybody else see the irony of this exchange?
Does anybody else notice that the point that intangible child has made has been COMPLETELY IGNORED while the respondents go in for name-calling and slurs as to "open-mindedness"????

Something has been shown here in this exchange, but I doubt you truly understand what that "something" truly is...

I found a variety of things interesting about this web-site.

1) It starts out "defending" President Bush with regards to a variety of charges, most of which I had never heard of before.

2) It complains about the "sources" used to accuse President Bush of these charges, but then it utilizes "newsmax.com" as its own source.
(Talk about the pot complaining about the kettle being black.)

3) It follows up the "defense" of President Bush with some rather vicious attacks of its own against other people. Actually mirroring the "attackers" in their actions.

Quite frankly, it "dispels" political garbage while throwing its own out on the front lawn...

Sure, I'll bite...

You have GOT to be kidding me! You take ANY of those websites seriously?
Dubyaspeaks.com? Surely you jest!
InformationClearingHouse? Have you even read the home page?
Online Journal? EVERY article is a patsy little slam at the current administration!

Beliefnet is the ONLY one of these sites that is even remotely credible - and if you actually read the article, it has nothing to do with what "Intangible Baby" was trying to prove!

You people are HILARIOUS! If Dubyaspeak.com told you that the world was flat, would you believe it?

"You people"?

Are you hearing voices???

Did I say ANYTHING about believing ANY of those sources were credible?
(Hint: The answer is NO.)

If you had read my follow-on comment, you might have been able to figure out that I consider a lot of the accusations against the president, along with the "tripod.com" web-site reply accusations, to be "political garbage".

My point obviously went right over your head...

Keep on jousting at those wind-mills...