Defending the Truth

  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Branches of Government

Branches of Government Debate topics of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of Government.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2006, 07:37 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,530
Points: 12,759, Level: 73
Points: 12,759, Level: 73 Points: 12,759, Level: 73 Points: 12,759, Level: 73
Level up: 78%, 91 Points needed
Level up: 78% Level up: 78% Level up: 78%
Activity: 22%
Activity: 22% Activity: 22% Activity: 22%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
I could come up with a very sizable list I'm sure, of actions taken by this administration that constitutes impeachment many times over in comparison to Clinton's actions.

Considering the fact that the United Arab Emirates has supported terrorism directly, and supported even the largest terrorist attack in history on our nation's soil, and the fact that this transaction would make the ports even more accessable to terrorism; could this be considered, in a way, considered as adhering to the enemies of the United States? Also you have to consider the fact that the President is threatening to use his veto power against a consensus of the vast majority of Americans and congress.

Just a thought.

It seems as if Bush has taken his personal corporate ties so far as to lose the trust of his own party.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Sponsored Links
Old 03-07-2006, 06:36 PM   #12 (permalink)
Head of Security
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Posts: 11,742
Points: 52,726, Level: 100
Points: 52,726, Level: 100 Points: 52,726, Level: 100 Points: 52,726, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
I have written both of my senators and to my congressmen expressing my extreme discontent with this whole idea. I don't think something such as the security of our ports should be outsourced to any country, but most especially not to a country that openly supported al-Qaeda prior to 9-11. If our security was outsourced previously, that should be fixed by handing it over to a U.S. company. I personally find it appalling.
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey





Old 03-09-2006, 11:46 AM   #13 (permalink)
Council Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 1,214
Points: 6,130, Level: 50
Points: 6,130, Level: 50 Points: 6,130, Level: 50 Points: 6,130, Level: 50
Level up: 90%, 20 Points needed
Level up: 90% Level up: 90% Level up: 90%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via ICQ to prescott911 Send a message via AIM to prescott911 Send a message via MSN to prescott911
prescott911 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
this is going to sound very ignorant of me, but why is this a bad thing for those of you that think it is??
-- San Fernando Valley's where it's at
Old 03-09-2006, 12:03 PM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,363
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by prescott911
this is going to sound very ignorant of me, but why is this a bad thing for those of you that think it is??
Short version: Arabs having direct access to American ports of entry.
Old 03-09-2006, 12:19 PM   #15 (permalink)
Beer Man
 
onthefence's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: stuck in the middle
Posts: 4,640
Thanks: 33
Thanked 120 Times in 86 Posts
onthefence is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Slacker can VETO but there are enough votes to overturn it so it really will not matter in the end.

It is even the Republicans talking overturning the VETO, I do not have the time to provide a link presentlly, but will later
"We could not now take time for further search or consideration, our victuals being much spent, especially our beer." - William Bradford



Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right.....

Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!
Old 03-09-2006, 12:24 PM   #16 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,363
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthefence
Slacker can VETO but there are enough votes to overturn it so it really will not matter in the end.

It is even the Republicans talking overturning the VETO, I do not have the time to provide a link presentlly, but will later
Basically this issue is dead in the water. The sale will NOT take place.


What WILL take place will be interesting to see...
Old 03-23-2006, 01:33 PM   #17 (permalink)
Citizen
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5
Points: 1,726, Level: 24
Points: 1,726, Level: 24 Points: 1,726, Level: 24 Points: 1,726, Level: 24
Level up: 26%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 26% Level up: 26% Level up: 26%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
eahullqu is offline
Reply With Quote
Losing his own base!
Did you all notice how quickly the Republicans distanced themselves from Bush's decision to support the Dubai Ports World purchase? So it obviously wasn't just a partisan issue. Both sides were in agreement (finally) that Bush made a stupid decision. All the while he kept saying, "I cain't understaind whaah everbody thanks this is a bad duhcision!".

......so, I guess it's safe to let an Arab company run some of our nation's ports because The Patiot Act will magicly protect us...? (obvious sarcasm)

Here's a cartoon I drew a couple weeks ago.



.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites