Three Representatives Want Impeachment Hearings

garysher · 01-29-2008, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyFlamingos

Please show me where i denied Monica's responsibility.

So now you accept Monica was responsible?

CrazyFlamingos · 01-29-2008, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garysher

So now you accept Monica was responsible?

No "now" to it. Show me where I denied her responsibility.

I see you ignored completely the rest of my post.

garysher · 01-29-2008, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyFlamingos

No "now" to it. Show me where I denied her responsibility.

I see you ignored completely the rest of my post.

SO why did you accuse me of being misogynistic when you agreed she was responsible, based on her actions rather than any inherent dislike of women?

Were you wrong to accuse me or are you misogynistic too??

CrazyFlamingos · 01-29-2008, 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garysher

SO why did you accuse me of being misogynistic when you agreed she was responsible, based on her actions rather than any inherent dislike of women?

Because you are a misogynist. Everybody who reads your drivel for any length of time recognizes this fact.

The latest example of blatant misogyny on your part was this lovely post stating that a "typical woman" tries to avoid responsibility.

Quote:

Originally Posted by garysher

Typical woman trying to avoid responsibility for Monica's incorrect moral choices.

Quote:

Were you wrong to accuse me or are you misogynistic too??

My identification of your misogyny has nothing to do with Monica.

garysher · 01-29-2008, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyFlamingos

Because you are a misogynist. Everybody who reads your drivel for any length of time recognizes this fact.

The latest example of blatant misogyny on your part was this lovely post stating that a "typical woman" tries to avoid responsibility.

My identification of your misogyny has nothing to do with Monica.

And yet you accused me of being a misogynist when I criticised Monica.

Now you are trying to suggest that was just a coincidence?

How typical that you attempt to duck responsibility and are reduced to name-calling.

mikelew007 · 01-29-2008, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grace

Sure thing KL.

Clinton Body Count

Oh jeez, not that "Clinton Body Count" crap...

Here, read: Urban Legends Reference Pages: The Clinton Body Count

CrazyFlamingos · 01-29-2008, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garysher

And yet you accused me of being a misogynist when I criticised Monica.

Now you are trying to suggest that was just a coincidence?

How typical that you attempt to duck responsibility and are reduced to name-calling.

Your version of events is seriously flawed. Are you lying or just exhibiting your usual difficulty in understanding what your read?

I am going to post the actual post that prompted me to call you a misogynist and my explanation one more time. If you do not understand this time... well, I don't really give a shit what you do if you don't understand. I am not going to post it again or respond to any more of your childish baiting.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyFlamingos

The latest example of blatant misogyny on your part was this lovely post stating that a "typical woman" tries to avoid responsibility.

Quote:

Originally Posted by garysher

Typical woman trying to avoid responsibility for Monica's incorrect moral choices.

garysher · 01-29-2008, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyFlamingos

Your version of events is seriously flawed. Are you lying or just exhibiting your usual difficulty in understanding what your read?

I am going to post the actual post that prompted me to call you a misogynist and my explanation one more time. If you do not understand this time... well, I don't really give a shit what you do if you don't understand. I am not going to post it again or respond to any more of your childish baiting.

Originally Posted by CrazyFlamingos (Three Representatives Want Impeachment Hearings)

The latest example of blatant misogyny on your part was this lovely post stating that a "typical woman" tries to avoid responsibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher

Typical woman trying to avoid responsibility for Monica's incorrect moral choices.

Your reaction to that post, and your subsequent reaction indicates your continued attempt to avoid responsibility for what you said - which was incorrect.

In that sense you are typical of many of the women who post on here, who refuse to take responsibility for various failed marriages, fatherless children etc

Those are the facts and they have nothing to do with "misogynism".

You also agreed with me that Lewinsky was blatantly irresponsible, and again that does not reflect any tendency toward misogyny - merely the facts.

Then you try your other favourite technique of saying you don't want to repeat yourself (when proven wrong), and promptly exiting stage left!

Perhaps one day you will learn to accept defeat gracefully, we can only live in hope. Lord knows you get enough practice.

sgtdmski · 01-30-2008, 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by waitingtables

Scooter Libby was convicted of obstruction of justice in a case about the outing of a covert CIA agent. Clinton's testimony under oath about a sexual affair actually shouldn't be considered perjury, because that testimony was not material to the sexual harassment case that he was being deposed for. Perjury is only a crime when the information is material to the case. Monica Lewinsky was not harassed by Clinton, she was a willing participant. And the lawsuit was dismissed. I have a huge problem when people compare an administration who lies and obstructs justice in order to hide what could be considered treasonous activity, to a man lying about an affair.

And what Cheney has done has in no way benefited this nation, it has hurt us enormously. It has helped anyone who Cheney awarded no bid contracts to, including Halliburton, KBR, and the energy industry cronies who have gotten disgustingly rich off of the cronyism. Give me a break.

The testimony was not material to the case???? Come now do you really believe I would buy that lie????? Lets see, Clinton was being deposed regarding his alleged sexual harassment of Paula Jones. Last time I checked, sexual harassment included a person in a position of power utilizing that position to gain sexual favors from a subordinate. Lets see, President and an Intern, a position of power and a subordinate, well what do you know. Furthermore, this affair would go to show a pattern of behavior on part of the defendant, again, something that is very germane to a case.

Treasonous activity?? What activity would that be???? Spying on people who call known terrorists????? Believing the same intelligence reports that France, Britian, Germany and the UN had access to and who also believed? Relying on the same intelligence that made Bill Clinton, his wife, Kerry, Kennedy, Levin and the whole lot of Congress believe that the best policy for Iraq was a regime change??? Or was it convincing your wife to send you to Niger to investigate the report of an attempt by Iraq to purchase nuclear powder from Niger, finding that an attempt was made then returning home and writing a op-ed in which you said it never occurred. And then when your socialite wife who has attending many parties in DC and let be known she worked at Langley, is suddenly announced as a CIA agent, she suddenly becomes covert??? Nice freaking try.

Clinton lied to protect himself from being found liable for the sexual harassment of Paula Jones in a civil case. ANd as you have so conveniently pointed out, the lie worked because the case was dismissed.

Newsflash, the contract Halliburton and KBR are working off of was originally awarded by the CLINTON adminstration!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! When the military was being downsized by the Clinton admin the logitical support was awarded to civilian contractors, and it was then that Halliburton and KBR were awarded contracts, the exact year was 1998 and the contracts were valid for 7 years. So if you want to talk about Halliburton and KBR, remember it was the glory boy Clinton's adminstration that put them in the position they are in. But nice try with another lie, your pretty good at that!!! I wonder did you get any tips from Bill???

dmk

CrazyFlamingos · 01-30-2008, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garysher

Your reaction to that post, and your subsequent reaction indicates your continued attempt to avoid responsibility for what you said - which was incorrect.

Show me the exact post where I was incorrect -- quote it and link to it. If you can do that, then I will gladly accept responsibility.

Or you could admit that you are playing your usual silly head games. The game where you pretend to win a victory simply because you don't have anything better to do than type out page after page of bombastic bullcrap while your "opponent" has a real life to get back to.

Nah. That will never happen.

What is going to happen is that you are just going to dance for me until I get tired of the game.