Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Branches of Government

Branches of Government Debate topics of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of Government.

View Poll Results: Who Was the best President of the 20th Century?
McKinley, William 1897-1901 0 0%
Roosevelt, Theodore 1901-09 2 5.41%
Taft, William H. 1909-13 0 0%
Wilson, Woodrow 1913-21 1 2.70%
Harding, Warren 1921-23 1 2.70%
Coolidge, Calvin 1923-29 0 0%
Hoover, Herbert 1929-33 0 0%
Roosevelt, Franklin D. 1933-45 8 21.62%
Truman, Harry 1945-53 2 5.41%
Eisenhower, Dwight 1953-61 3 8.11%
Kennedy, John F. 1961-63 3 8.11%
Johnson, Lyndon 1963-69 1 2.70%
Nixon, Richard 1969-74 0 0%
Ford, Gerald 1974-77 0 0%
Carter, Jimmy 1977-81 2 5.41%
Reagan, Ronald 1981-89 11 29.73%
Bush, George H.W. 1989-93 2 5.41%
Clinton, William J. 1993-2001 1 2.70%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-26-2005, 07:22 PM   #141 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Dylan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,808
Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Level up: 37%, 126 Points needed
Level up: 37% Level up: 37% Level up: 37%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Dylan is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
My vote goes to Eisenhower, even though he was a Republican. He did a lot to expand welfare and critical infrastructure during the 50's, and he pulled us out of the Korean War.

I would have voted for FDR, but that whole internment camps for Japanese people thing is a little hard to ignore.
The expansion of welfare is precisely why I did not vote for Eisenhower. He was a great general, and a great man, but I'd only describe him as a decent president. Regan was the best president this country has ever had, at least in modern times.
I think he is one of the worst presidents we have ever had. There are so many fucked up things about the Reagan Administration, I'm going to have to put this in list form. Maybe I'll try to reduce it to the top ten, or something.

1. Ignoring AIDS. Seriously, that was just plain awful.

2. Trickle down economics: the only economic plan to favor the rich which actually sounds like pissing on the less fortunate.

3. The Iran-Contra Scandal. I don't think I even need to say more about that.

4. Wasting money on Star Wars, which every mainstream, respectable physisyst in America said wouldn't work.

5. he got rid of a federal program that gave employment and training to over 300,000 people in poverty, 'trimmed' medicaid rolls, cut a lot of children off of welfare, while cutting taxes for rich people.

6. His Agriculture Department wanted to count ketchup as a vegetable when providing school lunches for poor children. For a lot of disadvantaged children, their federally provided school meal is the only hot, complete meal they get.

7. He eliminated 300,000 people from Social Security disability payments.

8. He suggested that most homeless people are homeless by choice. Because obviously, a lot of people enjoy sleeping outside in the winter, and not bathing. Obviously.

9. Reagan was the father of a gigantic deficit.

10. Reagan stepped up tensions against the Soviet Union when the USSR was already in decline, from lack of well... basically everything. The USSR would have collapsed whether Reagan was president or not.

11. He supported blacklisting, and was an informant during the freaky McCarthy era.

12. Bombing Libya was a quagmire, and really didn't improve the Middle East's impression of America. It's only one tiny part of a number of things which have come back to bite us in the ass. Also see Iran-Contra.

I'm going to stop here, because I already have ten, and two for good luck. I could easily go on though.
Would you say that Jimmy Carter was a better president than Ronald Reagan?
Hmmm... that's a toughie. Jimmy Carter screwed a lot of things up too. The Iran Hostage Crisis didn't go well, for example, although it was mostly the result of giving the Shah asylum and medical treatment. His heart was in the right place. If he had tried to attack Iran, things would have been much, much, much worse. Inflation and unemployment were at an all time high since the 1930's during his term, which was pretty bad.

The Carter Doctrine paved the way for modern terrorism by instilling a strong sense of nationalism in Middle Eastern countries. His plan of funding Pakistani and Afganistani rebels did contribute greatly to the fall of the USSR, but they also helped cause the surge of Islamic findamentalism and the Taliban we see today. Reinstating the draft kind of sucked, as did banning us from attending the Olympics in Moscow.

Saying we didn't need to apoligize for the Vietnam war because "The destruction was mutual" was downright stupid.

Supporting the Indonesian government's genocide against East Timor was horrific.

Attempting to cover up Three Mile Island was bad.

On the other hand, Carter did good things, which Reagan's administration is curiously devoid of. For example, Carter attempted to encourage Americans to save energy, and actually pitched in by getting solar panels for the White House. Reagan tore them up after coming into office. Carter helped make a peace treaty between Israel and Egypt, the only such peace treaty to ever be accomplished between Israel and any other Middle Eastern country. Carter enacted strong environmental legislation. Carter strongly opposed apartheid. After Carter left the White House, he worked with Habitat for Humanity, and won a Nobel Peace Prize.

So, while Carter did a lot of ass-backward things, at least he did some good things, even after leaving office. He was rather bad for the economy, but at least he didn't intentionally screw over poor people.
Sponsored Links
Old 09-26-2005, 10:39 PM   #142 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Level up: 51%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 51% Level up: 51% Level up: 51%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
My vote goes to Eisenhower, even though he was a Republican. He did a lot to expand welfare and critical infrastructure during the 50's, and he pulled us out of the Korean War.

I would have voted for FDR, but that whole internment camps for Japanese people thing is a little hard to ignore.
The expansion of welfare is precisely why I did not vote for Eisenhower. He was a great general, and a great man, but I'd only describe him as a decent president. Regan was the best president this country has ever had, at least in modern times.
Exactly! Eisenhower is one of my favorite presidents as a person, but his policies on welfare were foolish.

"You cannot extend the mastery of government over the daily life of a people without somewhere making it master of the people’s souls and thoughts."
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Old 10-21-2005, 08:50 PM   #143 (permalink)
The Man You Love to Hate
Premium Member
 
sgtdmski's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ketchikan, AK
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,854
Country:
Points: 7,226, Level: 56
Points: 7,226, Level: 56 Points: 7,226, Level: 56 Points: 7,226, Level: 56
Level up: 38%, 124 Points needed
Level up: 38% Level up: 38% Level up: 38%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via MSN to sgtdmski Send a message via Yahoo to sgtdmski
sgtdmski is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
So, while Carter did a lot of ass-backward things, at least he did some good things, even after leaving office. He was rather bad for the economy, but at least he didn't intentionally screw over poor people.
So unintentionally screwing over poor people is okay???? Who the hell do you think double digit inflation and unemployment hurt worse, the rich or the poor???

dmk
Conservatism, I repeat is not an ideology. It does not breed fanatics....But if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservative principles
-Russell Kirk-
Old 10-21-2005, 08:55 PM   #144 (permalink)
The Man You Love to Hate
Premium Member
 
sgtdmski's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ketchikan, AK
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,854
Country:
Points: 7,226, Level: 56
Points: 7,226, Level: 56 Points: 7,226, Level: 56 Points: 7,226, Level: 56
Level up: 38%, 124 Points needed
Level up: 38% Level up: 38% Level up: 38%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via MSN to sgtdmski Send a message via Yahoo to sgtdmski
sgtdmski is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
On the other hand, Carter did good things, which Reagan's administration is curiously devoid of.
Revamping the military, ending the fuel shortage, eliminating double digit inflation, lower taxes, and experience 86 months of continuos economic growth are not good things. More people moved from the bottom rung of the socio-economic ladder under President Reagan than at any other time in this country. Not to mention he did appoint the first woman to the Supreme Court. Or can we forget the fact that along with Margaret Thatcher and Pope John Paul II, he roled back communist aggression that led to the solidarity of Poland, and the eventual fall of the Eastern Bloc. Yeah I guess your right, he really didn't do much good, especially if freeing billions from the repression of communism, doesn't count for much.

dmk
Conservatism, I repeat is not an ideology. It does not breed fanatics....But if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservative principles
-Russell Kirk-
Old 10-24-2005, 10:58 AM   #145 (permalink)
Website Owner
Administrator
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,504
Country:
Thanks: 12
Thanked 70 Times in 62 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
RidinHighSpeeds is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
So, while Carter did a lot of ass-backward things, at least he did some good things, even after leaving office. He was rather bad for the economy, but at least he didn't intentionally screw over poor people.
So unintentionally screwing over poor people is okay???? Who the hell do you think double digit inflation and unemployment hurt worse, the rich or the poor???

dmk
With mortgage rates around the rate of a credit card during Carter's times, I would think that would also hurt the poor and many middle class people.
Old 11-11-2005, 03:53 PM   #146 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Dylan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,808
Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Level up: 37%, 126 Points needed
Level up: 37% Level up: 37% Level up: 37%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Dylan is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
On the other hand, Carter did good things, which Reagan's administration is curiously devoid of.
Revamping the military, ending the fuel shortage, eliminating double digit inflation, lower taxes, and experience 86 months of continuos economic growth are not good things. More people moved from the bottom rung of the socio-economic ladder under President Reagan than at any other time in this country. Not to mention he did appoint the first woman to the Supreme Court. Or can we forget the fact that along with Margaret Thatcher and Pope John Paul II, he roled back communist aggression that led to the solidarity of Poland, and the eventual fall of the Eastern Bloc. Yeah I guess your right, he really didn't do much good, especially if freeing billions from the repression of communism, doesn't count for much.

dmk
I've already written extensively as to why Reagan did nothing to end Communism, since it was collapsing in on itself without his pointless military expenditure and sabre-rattling, but I digress.

And no, it's not OK. I didn't say it was OK, and I didn't say I liked Jimmy Carter. I didn't vote for him as best President. I just happen to think that he was better than Reagan, but I also don't believe that's saying much.
Old 01-04-2006, 10:11 PM   #147 (permalink)
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,352
Country:
Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
The people are speaking... Reagan is winning!
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey





Old 01-04-2006, 10:16 PM   #148 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,876
Country:
Points: 28,493, Level: 99
Points: 28,493, Level: 99 Points: 28,493, Level: 99 Points: 28,493, Level: 99
Level up: 9%, 1,507 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
The people are speaking... Reagan is winning!

They spoke when they voted for dubya too
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 01-04-2006, 10:19 PM   #149 (permalink)
Website Owner
Administrator
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,504
Country:
Thanks: 12
Thanked 70 Times in 62 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
RidinHighSpeeds is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
The people are speaking... Reagan is winning!

They spoke when they voted for dubya too
Nah just 1 vote allowed...Those who spoke for Dubya are probably long gone now...
Old 01-05-2006, 01:43 AM   #150 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
tyreay's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: RI
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,846
Country:
Points: 15,165, Level: 79
Points: 15,165, Level: 79 Points: 15,165, Level: 79 Points: 15,165, Level: 79
Level up: 63%, 185 Points needed
Level up: 63% Level up: 63% Level up: 63%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to tyreay
tyreay is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Hands down Bill Clinton. He got a bad rap. If Hillary doesn't care where Bill's dick goes, why should I? He was a fiancial wizard who had this country back on the top. Then Mr. Over Draw My Credit Card got in there and ruined all the great work Bill did.
My second choice is Richard Nixon, from back when republicans were honest.
Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour

There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. ~Alexis de Tocqueville
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 PM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites