| Branches of Government Debate topics of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of Government. | 
02-26-2005, 10:16 AM
|
#41 (permalink)
| | Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: PA
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Level up: 30%, 141 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds They weren't lies Saddam did have WMD. He used them! When we entered Iraq it's obvious they are either hidden or he got rid of them. But you can't erase the past, he did have them and he did use them. The UN acknowledged this in the mid/late 90's. | According to Hans Blix you are full of shit, and I trust his word over the above sentiment. Saddam posed no threat in 2002 when we invaded. The inspections were working and that is the direct word that Bush ignored and then proved.
And that isn't even mentioning that the CIA told the Bush administration the exact same thing. |
Iraq is the size of California. Plus 3/4 is sand. There is no way he looked EVERYWHERE. The people who live there know every sand dune, Hans Blix didn’t. They asked where a known factory was; they inspect all KNOWN factories, then left and said there are no weapons.
And I agree about basic training is used to brainwash people to kill. Well, it IS the army. And their job DOES require killing. If you enlist into the army you’re not going to play checkers. | 
|  | |
02-26-2005, 11:34 AM
|
#42 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Country:  Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: 
Posts: 8,493
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Points: 26,333, Level: 96 | Level up: 97%, 17 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds They weren't lies Saddam did have WMD. He used them! When we entered Iraq it's obvious they are either hidden or he got rid of them. But you can't erase the past, he did have them and he did use them. The UN acknowledged this in the mid/late 90's. | According to Hans Blix you are full of shit, and I trust his word over the above sentiment. Saddam posed no threat in 2002 when we invaded. The inspections were working and that is the direct word that Bush ignored and then proved.
And that isn't even mentioning that the CIA told the Bush administration the exact same thing. |
Iraq is the size of California. Plus 3/4 is sand. There is no way he looked EVERYWHERE. The people who live there know every sand dune, Hans Blix didn’t. They asked where a known factory was; they inspect all KNOWN factories, then left and said there are no weapons.
And I agree about basic training is used to brainwash people to kill. Well, it IS the army. And their job DOES require killing. If you enlist into the army you’re not going to play checkers. |
Ever heard of satellites? Why are you guys so stuck on your ideology? Bush was wrong and lied to get support. It is terrible when people defend such immoral activities.
And you guys are probably the schmucks that pissed and moaned and wasted millions of dollars on a blowjob. Sad and pathetic. | |
| | |
02-26-2005, 08:05 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
| | Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: PA
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Level up: 30%, 141 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds They weren't lies Saddam did have WMD. He used them! When we entered Iraq it's obvious they are either hidden or he got rid of them. But you can't erase the past, he did have them and he did use them. The UN acknowledged this in the mid/late 90's. | According to Hans Blix you are full of shit, and I trust his word over the above sentiment. Saddam posed no threat in 2002 when we invaded. The inspections were working and that is the direct word that Bush ignored and then proved.
And that isn't even mentioning that the CIA told the Bush administration the exact same thing. |
Iraq is the size of California. Plus 3/4 is sand. There is no way he looked EVERYWHERE. The people who live there know every sand dune, Hans Blix didn’t. They asked where a known factory was; they inspect all KNOWN factories, then left and said there are no weapons.
And I agree about basic training is used to brainwash people to kill. Well, it IS the army. And their job DOES require killing. If you enlist into the army you’re not going to play checkers. |
Ever heard of satellites? Why are you guys so stuck on your ideology? Bush was wrong and lied to get support. It is terrible when people defend such immoral activities.
And you guys are probably the schmucks that pissed and moaned and wasted millions of dollars on a blowjob. Sad and pathetic. | Ever hear of camo? And i'm not sure what 'blowjob' you were referring to. | |
| | |
02-27-2005, 09:25 AM
|
#44 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Country: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender:
Posts: 8,493
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Points: 26,333, Level: 96 | Level up: 97%, 17 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds They weren't lies Saddam did have WMD. He used them! When we entered Iraq it's obvious they are either hidden or he got rid of them. But you can't erase the past, he did have them and he did use them. The UN acknowledged this in the mid/late 90's. | According to Hans Blix you are full of shit, and I trust his word over the above sentiment. Saddam posed no threat in 2002 when we invaded. The inspections were working and that is the direct word that Bush ignored and then proved.
And that isn't even mentioning that the CIA told the Bush administration the exact same thing. |
Iraq is the size of California. Plus 3/4 is sand. There is no way he looked EVERYWHERE. The people who live there know every sand dune, Hans Blix didn’t. They asked where a known factory was; they inspect all KNOWN factories, then left and said there are no weapons.
And I agree about basic training is used to brainwash people to kill. Well, it IS the army. And their job DOES require killing. If you enlist into the army you’re not going to play checkers. |
Ever heard of satellites? Why are you guys so stuck on your ideology? Bush was wrong and lied to get support. It is terrible when people defend such immoral activities.
And you guys are probably the schmucks that pissed and moaned and wasted millions of dollars on a blowjob. Sad and pathetic. | Ever hear of camo? And i'm not sure what 'blowjob' you were referring to. |
So you are going against the UN inspectors word? And CIA officials with over 30 years experience.
You keep defending your ideology. I'll keep listening to those in the know that see past their noses. | |
| | |
02-27-2005, 05:19 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
| | Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: PA
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Level up: 30%, 141 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds They weren't lies Saddam did have WMD. He used them! When we entered Iraq it's obvious they are either hidden or he got rid of them. But you can't erase the past, he did have them and he did use them. The UN acknowledged this in the mid/late 90's. | According to Hans Blix you are full of shit, and I trust his word over the above sentiment. Saddam posed no threat in 2002 when we invaded. The inspections were working and that is the direct word that Bush ignored and then proved.
And that isn't even mentioning that the CIA told the Bush administration the exact same thing. |
Iraq is the size of California. Plus 3/4 is sand. There is no way he looked EVERYWHERE. The people who live there know every sand dune, Hans Blix didn’t. They asked where a known factory was; they inspect all KNOWN factories, then left and said there are no weapons.
And I agree about basic training is used to brainwash people to kill. Well, it IS the army. And their job DOES require killing. If you enlist into the army you’re not going to play checkers. |
Ever heard of satellites? Why are you guys so stuck on your ideology? Bush was wrong and lied to get support. It is terrible when people defend such immoral activities.
And you guys are probably the schmucks that pissed and moaned and wasted millions of dollars on a blowjob. Sad and pathetic. | Ever hear of camo? And i'm not sure what 'blowjob' you were referring to. |
So you are going against the UN inspectors word? And CIA officials with over 30 years experience.
You keep defending your ideology. I'll keep listening to those in the know that see past their noses. | Why are you on here if you just want to hear from people that agrees with you? I'm actually looking for people to convince me otherwise. As for going against the UN, considering the UN 'oil for food' scandal i'm not believing anything they say. By the way, I dont look down on anyone. But I do feel strongly about my country. I dont want another 9/11 to happen. I lost someone close to me on that date. | |
| | |
02-27-2005, 07:16 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Country: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender:
Posts: 8,493
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Points: 26,333, Level: 96 | Level up: 97%, 17 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Why are you on here if you just want to hear from people that agrees with you? I'm actually looking for people to convince me otherwise. As for going against the UN, considering the UN 'oil for food' scandal i'm not believing anything they say. By the way, I dont look down on anyone. But I do feel strongly about my country. I dont want another 9/11 to happen. I lost someone close to me on that date. | 9/11 was most likely an inside job | |
| | |
02-28-2005, 10:47 AM
|
#47 (permalink)
| | Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: PA
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Level up: 30%, 141 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Why are you on here if you just want to hear from people that agrees with you? I'm actually looking for people to convince me otherwise. As for going against the UN, considering the UN 'oil for food' scandal i'm not believing anything they say. By the way, I dont look down on anyone. But I do feel strongly about my country. I dont want another 9/11 to happen. I lost someone close to me on that date. | 9/11 was most likely an inside job | The CIA did it?  . The CIA had a plan to hire saudi's to fly planes into the world trade center. A highly risky plan which was traced easily to the hijackers. Which then could tie to who organized it (Al qeada, not the CIA). If a plan is that sloppy (although effective through luck) its not planed by a government agency, too risky. Heck, Nixon couldnt even get away with breaking into an office. And clinton couldnt get away with that 'blowjob' you talked about. With the internet/media today, you cant get away with anything. Just ask the UN | |
| | |
02-28-2005, 11:13 AM
|
#48 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Country: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender:
Posts: 8,493
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Points: 26,333, Level: 96 | Level up: 97%, 17 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Quote: |
Originally Posted by hevusa Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Why are you on here if you just want to hear from people that agrees with you? I'm actually looking for people to convince me otherwise. As for going against the UN, considering the UN 'oil for food' scandal i'm not believing anything they say. By the way, I dont look down on anyone. But I do feel strongly about my country. I dont want another 9/11 to happen. I lost someone close to me on that date. | 9/11 was most likely an inside job | The CIA did it? . The CIA had a plan to hire saudi's to fly planes into the world trade center. A highly risky plan which was traced easily to the hijackers. Which then could tie to who organized it (Al qeada, not the CIA). If a plan is that sloppy (although effective through luck) its not planed by a government agency, too risky. Heck, Nixon couldnt even get away with breaking into an office. And clinton couldnt get away with that 'blowjob' you talked about. With the internet/media today, you cant get away with anything. Just ask the UN |
So you really buy that nearly 20 Saudi's controlled by Bin Ladin sucessfully hi-jacked 4 planes simultaneously? And that fighter planes were just not scrambled to NYC during the half hour between the first and second planes hitting? Not to mention a plane hitting the pentagon?
Please! | |
| | |
03-01-2005, 09:33 AM
|
#49 (permalink)
| | Citizen
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: PA
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Level up: 30%, 141 Points needed | | Nobody in power wants to have no power. Therefore they only do what they think they WOULD get away with. With a poor plan, involving all those people, all of which were A) born in another country and B) were not in any government. No, I dont buy it. When you use people that wouldnt have anything to lose by leaking information to the public (friends, family), the plan will fail, they connect it to you, and you lose that power. There were just too many chances for the plan to fail. The bigger question is if the US government did make this poor plan, with the brightest minds we can produce, we are in trouble. I dont buy that either. Any other ideas? | |
| | |
03-02-2005, 08:52 AM
|
#50 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Country: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender:
Posts: 8,493
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Points: 26,333, Level: 96 | Level up: 97%, 17 Points needed | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by idrankwhat96 Nobody in power wants to have no power. Therefore they only do what they think they WOULD get away with. With a poor plan, involving all those people, all of which were A) born in another country and B) were not in any government. No, I dont buy it. When you use people that wouldnt have anything to lose by leaking information to the public (friends, family), the plan will fail, they connect it to you, and you lose that power. There were just too many chances for the plan to fail. The bigger question is if the US government did make this poor plan, with the brightest minds we can produce, we are in trouble. I dont buy that either. Any other ideas? |
Are you aware that the Nazi's burnt down thier own govenment building to gain support of the people by blaming it on their enemies? Sound familiar? | |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | |
