alias

I'm sure there was info on how to build a nuke before that. So your worried about nukes if Bush publishes the info on the net, but if a country is trying to build one, you could care less and want Bush to leave them alone. Makes perfect sense.

foundit66

You really don't think your responses through at all, do you...
1) Fine then. Show it. Show me a web-site that gives detailed schematics on refining ore necessary for weapons grade plutonium.
If you think the White House did nothing that isn't already readily available, then show it.

2) If it's such a non-issue, then WHY would it be an issue if Iraq had this "info"?


You really can't stop yourself from pretending I said things I never did.
Of course I'm concerned if a country is trying to build a nuke. I was very concerned that Iraq had that information way back then...

You just have to make stuff up if when you're trying to argue, don't you...

__________________
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher

alias

You didn't know Israel bombed their nuke facility. Try to keep up.

foundit66

You talked about a NUKE facility.
The typical use of the word "nuke" is regarding a NUCLEAR WEAPON.

You talked about Iraq building a "nuke facility". In the typical discussion on claims of what Iraq "tried" to do, it's about building WMDs.

I didn't realize you were talking about a nuclear POWER GENERATING station.
Use the right word next time and you'll be understood, dumb-ass.

And if you want to play the "you didn't know" game, YOU didn't know that Bush put the plans for building a nuclear weapon on the internet.
I quote alias: "LOL. Yeah, Bush put on the internet how to build a nuke bomb. LOL. Did you get that from Hevusa?"

There was NO grammatical confusion on that. You were just plain ignorant of that.
And instead of addressing THAT subject, you're now trying to CHANGE the subject...

__________________
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher

alias

I did use the right word. It was a nuke facility. You just got confused as you usually do, you dumba ass limp twit.

foundit66

It's hilarious how you have dropped EVERYTHING ELSE in this conversation except what "nuke" means. That's the ONLY thing you're arguing about at the moment.

You're not trying to defend the White House in putting NUCLEAR BOMB DIAGRAMS up on the web. You didn't even know about that, but you ignore your own ignorance while you try to deride me for thinking you meant nuclear weapons when you said "nukes".

As usual, you try to change the subject to the pointless when you've lost.

__________________
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher

alias

You didn't know Israel bombed their nuke facility. So we're even.

greyfox

Approval ratings don't guide world events. Love him or hate him, George Bush
is a man of integrity trying to do what he believes is the right thing, which history will show.

alias

Exactly. History will judge him fairly. These idiots said the same things about Reagan. Liberals are vile hateful people who have never been right about anything. They were not right about Reagan and they are not right about Bush. It wasn't the liberals who defeated the Soviet Union in the cold war. How many liberals have won the presidency by taking 49 states? None. The only reason Clinton was elected was because of a third party candidate. Those were not liberal voters who voted for Ross Perot. If not for Perot, Clinton would never have been president.

foundit66

Nowhere near...
And you have PROVEN MY POINT.

Earlier, you talked about how Iraq "tried to build a nuke facility".

As I pointed out, that implies NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
You obfuscated the point by trying to pretend it was obvious that it was a POWER station.

But then what did you ask me a few posts later???

alias: "Was Saddam trying to make nukes?"
I responded regarding nuclear WEAPONS, and NOT ONCE did you attempt to correct me saying that it was about nuclear power facilities.

I have been consistent in that "nukes" means nuclear weapons.
YOU even understand that "nukes" means nuclear weapons, but then you try to insist that "nuke facility" means nuclear power plants and not a facility to build nuclear weapons.


I DID know that Israel bombed a nuclear POWER plant, but hadn't heard any crap about bombing a nuclear weapons facility. THAT is what I responded to.

NOT ONLY did you have no fricken clue that the White House POSTED ON THE INTERNET how to build a nuclear weapon, you ALSO DEFENDED the White House in doing so.

Nowhere near "even". Nowhere near...

__________________
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher