Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Branches of Government

Branches of Government Debate topics of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of Government.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2005, 02:21 PM   #31 (permalink)
Citizen
 
bullwinkle's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 83
Points: 2,764, Level: 32
Points: 2,764, Level: 32 Points: 2,764, Level: 32 Points: 2,764, Level: 32
Level up: 10%, 136 Points needed
Level up: 10% Level up: 10% Level up: 10%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to bullwinkle
bullwinkle is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaaaman
Quote:
Originally Posted by bullwinkle
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
President Clinton was a lawyer, if anyone should have known better, it was him. Furthermore, the lying under oath and the following cover up had already caused the impeachment of one president. If anyone should have known better, it was definitely Bill Clinton, for his own wife, following law school, worked as a member of the council that filed the articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon. He lied under oath, and then attempted to cover-up his lies. The press fooled the American public into thinking it was about the sex, but it was about the lying under oath. Any Senator, Democrat and Republican that voted against impeachment should be ashamed of themselves.

The reason Richard Nixon resigned his office was because the Senate Republican Leadership had imformed him that members were free to vote as the evidence indicated and not to follow party lines.

dmk
same old liberal bull different days

[img][/img]
Were you trying to post an image there, Bullwinkle? :P
I thought he was just fond of those tags...

remember if you can't say something nice don't say anything at all
Sponsored Links
Old 10-04-2005, 02:51 PM   #32 (permalink)
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,352
Country:
Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bullwinkle
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaaaman
Quote:
Originally Posted by bullwinkle
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
President Clinton was a lawyer, if anyone should have known better, it was him. Furthermore, the lying under oath and the following cover up had already caused the impeachment of one president. If anyone should have known better, it was definitely Bill Clinton, for his own wife, following law school, worked as a member of the council that filed the articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon. He lied under oath, and then attempted to cover-up his lies. The press fooled the American public into thinking it was about the sex, but it was about the lying under oath. Any Senator, Democrat and Republican that voted against impeachment should be ashamed of themselves.

The reason Richard Nixon resigned his office was because the Senate Republican Leadership had imformed him that members were free to vote as the evidence indicated and not to follow party lines.

dmk
same old liberal bull different days

[img][/img]
Were you trying to post an image there, Bullwinkle? :P
I thought he was just fond of those tags...

remember if you can't say something nice don't say anything at all
1) I didn't say anything 'not nice'...
2) It was a Joke.
3) If we followed that rule, this would be a pretty empty site.


And Since I need to say something nice to be allowed to respond...

"Flowers are pretty"
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey





Old 10-04-2005, 03:28 PM   #33 (permalink)
Citizen
 
bullwinkle's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 83
Points: 2,764, Level: 32
Points: 2,764, Level: 32 Points: 2,764, Level: 32 Points: 2,764, Level: 32
Level up: 10%, 136 Points needed
Level up: 10% Level up: 10% Level up: 10%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to bullwinkle
bullwinkle is offline
Reply With Quote
Why the liberals hate Bush
For 50 years they ran the show and they had the mainstream media never challenging them but merely amplifying and echoing what they said. We on the other hand, those same 50 years, trying to gain prominence, gain a foothold and eventually become the majority. We had to learn to express our views, explain to people in a persuasive way what we believed and at the same time we're being challenged and impugned and laughed at, mischaracterized by the left and the media, and yet we forged ahead. After 50 years we've gotten damn good at telling people why we think what we think. The left hasn't. The left can't tell anybody why they think what they think. All they can do is discredit us and try to scare people into thinking we somehow mean harm to them. They can't explain their positions. All they can do is articulate them. That's why they're losing elections. I mean none of this is particularly upsetting to me but it is an interesting intellectual exercise to try to explain them, and I defy anybody to be able to do it. I mean you can come up with examples. But to give me a reason why a 35-year-old human being in America living a prosperous life hates this country and accuses this country first, assumes this country is the enemy, I defy you to give me an intellectual explanation that I will accept. There isn't one. There are only psychological and emotional reasons and they make no sense whatsoever. You can go nuts trying to understand it. It's best to laugh at it and understand that it all means they're losing. No matter where you look they're losing. No matter where you look, other than their strongholds. But even in their strongholds there's some trouble because there's some defectors. Some liberals can't abide it anymore. We've had their columns on this program. They can't abide the intellectual hypocrisy. They can't abide the dishonesty. They can no longer associate themselves with it. They can't explain it themselves, and they'd rather not.
Old 10-04-2005, 03:33 PM   #34 (permalink)
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,352
Country:
Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
Reply With Quote
Re: Why the liberals hate Bush
Quote:
Originally Posted by bullwinkle
For 50 years they ran the show and they had the mainstream media never challenging them but merely amplifying and echoing what they said. We on the other hand, those same 50 years, trying to gain prominence, gain a foothold and eventually become the majority. We had to learn to express our views, explain to people in a persuasive way what we believed and at the same time we're being challenged and impugned and laughed at, mischaracterized by the left and the media, and yet we forged ahead. After 50 years we've gotten damn good at telling people why we think what we think. The left hasn't. The left can't tell anybody why they think what they think. All they can do is discredit us and try to scare people into thinking we somehow mean harm to them. They can't explain their positions. All they can do is articulate them. That's why they're losing elections. I mean none of this is particularly upsetting to me but it is an interesting intellectual exercise to try to explain them, and I defy anybody to be able to do it. I mean you can come up with examples. But to give me a reason why a 35-year-old human being in America living a prosperous life hates this country and accuses this country first, assumes this country is the enemy, I defy you to give me an intellectual explanation that I will accept. There isn't one. There are only psychological and emotional reasons and they make no sense whatsoever. You can go nuts trying to understand it. It's best to laugh at it and understand that it all means they're losing. No matter where you look they're losing. No matter where you look, other than their strongholds. But even in their strongholds there's some trouble because there's some defectors. Some liberals can't abide it anymore. We've had their columns on this program. They can't abide the intellectual hypocrisy. They can't abide the dishonesty. They can no longer associate themselves with it. They can't explain it themselves, and they'd rather not.
You forgot to say something nice dude...

Kittens are Cute
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey





Old 10-06-2005, 10:28 PM   #35 (permalink)
Council Member
 
jaaaman's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,442
Country:
Points: 7,131, Level: 55
Points: 7,131, Level: 55 Points: 7,131, Level: 55 Points: 7,131, Level: 55
Level up: 91%, 19 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 50%
Activity: 50% Activity: 50% Activity: 50%
Send a message via Yahoo to jaaaman
jaaaman is offline
Reply With Quote
Re: Why the liberals hate Bush
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by bullwinkle
For 50 years they ran the show and they had the mainstream media never challenging them but merely amplifying and echoing what they said. We on the other hand, those same 50 years, trying to gain prominence, gain a foothold and eventually become the majority. We had to learn to express our views, explain to people in a persuasive way what we believed and at the same time we're being challenged and impugned and laughed at, mischaracterized by the left and the media, and yet we forged ahead. After 50 years we've gotten damn good at telling people why we think what we think. The left hasn't. The left can't tell anybody why they think what they think. All they can do is discredit us and try to scare people into thinking we somehow mean harm to them. They can't explain their positions. All they can do is articulate them. That's why they're losing elections. I mean none of this is particularly upsetting to me but it is an interesting intellectual exercise to try to explain them, and I defy anybody to be able to do it. I mean you can come up with examples. But to give me a reason why a 35-year-old human being in America living a prosperous life hates this country and accuses this country first, assumes this country is the enemy, I defy you to give me an intellectual explanation that I will accept. There isn't one. There are only psychological and emotional reasons and they make no sense whatsoever. You can go nuts trying to understand it. It's best to laugh at it and understand that it all means they're losing. No matter where you look they're losing. No matter where you look, other than their strongholds. But even in their strongholds there's some trouble because there's some defectors. Some liberals can't abide it anymore. We've had their columns on this program. They can't abide the intellectual hypocrisy. They can't abide the dishonesty. They can no longer associate themselves with it. They can't explain it themselves, and they'd rather not.
You forgot to say something nice dude...

Kittens are Cute
Do you have an opinion on bullwinkles post? I think he made some valid points about liberals in this post.





"I am not ashamed of the Gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes." Romans 1:16
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 PM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites