Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Budget and Taxes

Budget and Taxes Do you feel that raising taxes will help solve the debt of the United States? Are you a fan of Reaganomics?

View Poll Results: Flat Tax
For it! 10 43.48%
Against it! 6 26.09%
Some other option for change 6 26.09%
Do not change our system 1 4.35%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-04-2005, 09:41 AM   #21 (permalink)
Website Owner
Administrator
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,504
Country:
Thanks: 12
Thanked 70 Times in 62 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
RidinHighSpeeds is online now
Reply With Quote
 
liberalguy, Do you now understand how the flat tax system works??
Sponsored Links
Old 08-24-2005, 03:09 PM   #22 (permalink)
Citizen
 
bullwinkle's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 83
Points: 2,764, Level: 32
Points: 2,764, Level: 32 Points: 2,764, Level: 32 Points: 2,764, Level: 32
Level up: 10%, 136 Points needed
Level up: 10% Level up: 10% Level up: 10%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to bullwinkle
bullwinkle is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojo Potatoes
  • It doesn't have anything to do with Republican versus Democrat. And a flat tax is not unfair, at least no more than the plethora of other taxes inflicted upon society. Taxes should pay for national defense, regulation of interstate commerce and infrastructure. It should not be portioned out to pay for social programs. A flat tax does not have to target lower incomes. It could easily exclude the lower end of the spectrum with respect to income, e.g., no tax at all below $30k, as I suggested. The premise that the government has some obligation to take away money from those who earn it to supplant the needs of those who do not is ludicrous.

    And of all the taxes imposed upon society, none could be more punitive than the sin taxes. Much of the consumption of alcohol and tobacco is paid by the lower income groups. Now that is punitive . . . taxing morality.
Good post Mojo Potatoes !
Old 09-26-2005, 02:47 AM   #23 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Level up: 51%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 51% Level up: 51% Level up: 51%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline
Reply With Quote
Re: FlatTax?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds
What do you think about the flax tax?

More information here:
http://www.fairtax.org/
Isn't the flat tax different from the fair tax?
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Old 09-26-2005, 07:12 PM   #24 (permalink)
Website Owner
Administrator
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,504
Country:
Thanks: 12
Thanked 70 Times in 62 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
RidinHighSpeeds is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Didn't even notice that

The link to the video was from www.fairtax.org where they talked about the "flat tax".
Old 01-23-2006, 06:46 AM   #25 (permalink)
Community Leader
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 694
Points: 4,625, Level: 43
Points: 4,625, Level: 43 Points: 4,625, Level: 43 Points: 4,625, Level: 43
Level up: 38%, 125 Points needed
Level up: 38% Level up: 38% Level up: 38%
Activity: 4%
Activity: 4% Activity: 4% Activity: 4%
indago is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds
The more money you have, the more money you have to spend. If you spend more money, you are paying more taxes.

How is this system not making sense?

____________________________________________
"We need true tax reform that will at least make a start toward restoring for our children the American Dream that wealth is denied to no one, that each individual has the right to fly as high as his strength and ability will take him. . . . But we cannot have such reform while our tax policy is engineered by people who view the tax as a means of achieving changes in our social structure." -- Ronald Reagan
And in this vein, the House of Representatives acted. On the date 19 August 1982, a resolution, H. Res. 571, was brought before the House of Representatives for consideration which concerned the unconstitutionality of the methods used in the Senate concerning H.R. 4961, Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA). The resolution declared that the Senate had taken the tax cut that President Reagan had proposed, and that the House of Representatives had acted upon, and added amendments, making it one of the largest tax increases up to that time. Representative Dan Rostenkowski then moved to lay the resolution on the table, a move to sidestep the issue and move on with the bill. The resolution was laid on the table. At issue was the Origination Clause of the Constitution, whereas all bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives. Senator Dole, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, was asked why TEFRA did not originate in the House, and replied, "Well, I'll be very honest, because the House didn't want to originate it." Representative W. Henson Moore, and several other Congressmen, brought suit before the federal District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking a declaratory judgment that passage of TEFRA infringed upon the powers of the House under the origination clause of the Constitution, and, two days later, Representative Ron Paul filed an identical suit. U.S. District Judge Joyce Hens Green dismissed the plaintiffs' cases for lack of standing. The judge stated that the Plaintiff's in this case were just frustrated because they were outvoted by their fellow legislators.
Old 01-23-2006, 07:08 AM   #26 (permalink)
Community Leader
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 694
Points: 4,625, Level: 43
Points: 4,625, Level: 43 Points: 4,625, Level: 43 Points: 4,625, Level: 43
Level up: 38%, 125 Points needed
Level up: 38% Level up: 38% Level up: 38%
Activity: 4%
Activity: 4% Activity: 4% Activity: 4%
indago is offline
Reply With Quote
Re: FlatTax?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds
What do you think about the flax tax?

If your not sure what this is...it would help eliminate the income tax where you only pay taxes on things you buy. And you can rebate the taxes on things like clothes, food, mainly necessities. So basically the more you spend, the more taxes you pay. The more you save, the more money you keep (goverment does not have their hand out).

The big plus for this is other countries would have to pay this tax as well when they are buying goods or trading with the US. After much research, 100s of billions of dollars can go to the US paying off Social Security and the big debt we have had for decades.

More information here:
http://www.fairtax.org/

Good video to watch on this tax system:
http://64.105.60.195/video/Hastert.wmv
It says, at the Fair Tax Website: "The current Federal income tax system is broken."

It's not broken; it's the people that are broken. Most folks don't really know what the federal "income tax" is. It has been declared, by the Supreme Court of the United States, that the federal income tax is an excise tax. Mr. Justice William R. Day, delivering the opinion of the United States Supreme Court, explained what an excise tax is: "Excises are "taxes laid upon the manufacture, sale, or consumption of commodities within the country, upon licenses to pursue certain occupations, and upon corporate privileges." Cooley, Const. Lim. 7th ed. 680 ...the requirement to pay such taxes involves the exercise of privileges,..." -- Stella P. Flint v Stone Tracy Company 220 US 107, 151, 152 (1911)

It is recorded, in the Congressional Record: "The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such. It is an excise tax with respect to certain activities and privileges which is measured by reference to the income which they produce. The income is not the subject of the tax: it is the basis for determining the amount of tax."

Chief Justice Edward D. White, delivering the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, and quoting from a previous case, stated: "In the matter of taxation, the Constitution recognizes the two great classes of direct and indirect taxes, and lays down two rules by which their imposition must be governed, namely: The rule of apportionment as to direct taxes, and the rule of uniformity as to duties, imposts and excises." -- Pollock v Farmers' Loan & Trust Company 157 US 429, 557 (1895) Brushaber v Union Pacific Railroad Co. 240 US 1, 13 (1916)

The Congress was never granted the power to lay a direct tax upon the inhabitants of the States.
Old 02-03-2006, 10:41 PM   #27 (permalink)
Citizen
 
lkk1209's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: US
Posts: 30
Points: 2,020, Level: 27
Points: 2,020, Level: 27 Points: 2,020, Level: 27 Points: 2,020, Level: 27
Level up: 14%, 130 Points needed
Level up: 14% Level up: 14% Level up: 14%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
lkk1209 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
If you want us to spend less on our military, perhaps you should start crying to all those countries that save on the military because of ours. Germany, Japan, Taiwan, and the UN. Perhaps if the UN would reimburse us for the expense of peacekeeping operations that they have sent US troops on, that we footed the bill.
I don't know about other countries. However, there is something you might not understand about Taiwan. Well, I appriciates American. Because of you, we are still living in front of the mouth of a ugly tiger yet not been eaten. If not for American, maybe we are now enslaved by Chinese communitists.

However, we have never bought weapon which is match to its price. For example, the price we bought a P3-C is 3 times more than Korean bought the same thing. The submarine quotation for taiwan is 5 times the price sold to Australia. Why we have to pay such a price? Well, all the other countries are subdued by the stress from China not to sold weapon to taiwan. Only Amercan dear to sell us weapon.

As a result, we don't cost you too much money. The weapons we bought from you are always those that are no longer used or ready to retire from service. And we pay a very good price. won't you feel happy?
Old 03-28-2006, 06:41 AM   #28 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
intangible child's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California Dreamin
Posts: 3,391
Points: 21,555, Level: 92
Points: 21,555, Level: 92 Points: 21,555, Level: 92 Points: 21,555, Level: 92
Level up: 21%, 795 Points needed
Level up: 21% Level up: 21% Level up: 21%
Activity: 59%
Activity: 59% Activity: 59% Activity: 59%
intangible child is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ridinhighspeeds
What do you think about the flax tax?

If your not sure what this is...it would help eliminate the income tax where you only pay taxes on things you buy. And you can rebate the taxes on things like clothes, food, mainly necessities. So basically the more you spend, the more taxes you pay. The more you save, the more money you keep (goverment does not have their hand out).

The big plus for this is other countries would have to pay this tax as well when they are buying goods or trading with the US. After much research, 100s of billions of dollars can go to the US paying off Social Security and the big debt we have had for decades.

More information here:
http://www.fairtax.org/

Good video to watch on this tax system:
http://64.105.60.195/video/Hastert.wmv
I couldn't vote.
You forgot Boston Tea Party!
http://rexcurry.net/SSNall.html
Old 03-28-2006, 03:44 PM   #29 (permalink)
Website Owner
Administrator
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,504
Country:
Thanks: 12
Thanked 70 Times in 62 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
RidinHighSpeeds is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by intangible child
I couldn't vote.
You forgot Boston Tea Party!
http://rexcurry.net/SSNall.html
hahaha My God!
Old 03-29-2006, 12:01 AM   #30 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 216
Points: 3,284, Level: 35
Points: 3,284, Level: 35 Points: 3,284, Level: 35 Points: 3,284, Level: 35
Level up: 56%, 66 Points needed
Level up: 56% Level up: 56% Level up: 56%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
NoMoreDems-Reps is offline
Reply With Quote
 
I Think we would have to create a "FLATTER TAX" method.

If we just paid taxes on what we bought the poor would
really suffer. A family of 4 will eat, drink, and consume pretty
much the same amount, whether they make $30K/yr or $300K/yr.

But everyone should pay some taxes even if it's just $1/yr, be it
a token payment. Everyone should take part in taking care of our
country.

And on the other side of the spectrum, those good for nothing
Oil companies that screw us over and make record profits off of
our misery should pay 90% taxes!

Well first we should worry about the corrupt US government
before we worry about the tax system don't you think?
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites