Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Capital Punishment

Capital Punishment Debate and defend your political beliefs on whether or not capital punishment is morally right.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2006, 03:09 PM   #61 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
No, you keep putting words in people's mouth when you call them babies.
You haven't answered my question, have you?

Is it a baby at 5-months' gestation? Keep in mind that the "baby/fetus" can live outside the womb at that point.

Is it a baby at 5-months' gestation?


And what about 20 years from now, when babies at 3-months' gestation are living outside the womb? Will they be "humans" then?



Your answers, please!
Sponsored Links
Old 05-09-2006, 03:44 PM   #62 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,876
Country:
Points: 28,493, Level: 99
Points: 28,493, Level: 99 Points: 28,493, Level: 99 Points: 28,493, Level: 99
Level up: 9%, 1,507 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
You haven't answered my question, have you?

Is it a baby at 5-months' gestation? Keep in mind that the "baby/fetus" can live outside the womb at that point.

Is it a baby at 5-months' gestation?


And what about 20 years from now, when babies at 3-months' gestation are living outside the womb? Will they be "humans" then?



Your answers, please!

I only support first trimester abortions.

In humans, parturition normally occurs at a gestational age of 37 to 42 weeks. Childbirth occurring before 37 weeks of gestation is considered preterm and has been associated with 70% of neonatal mortality and 75% of morbidity. A preterm fetus is considered viable only if it is delivered after the 28th week of gestation; before this age, those major developmental events that would allow the fetus to survive outside the womb have not occurred.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.

Last edited by hevusa; 05-09-2006 at 03:47 PM.
Old 05-09-2006, 03:48 PM   #63 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Dylan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,808
Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Level up: 37%, 126 Points needed
Level up: 37% Level up: 37% Level up: 37%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Dylan is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
You haven't answered my question, have you?

Is it a baby at 5-months' gestation? Keep in mind that the "baby/fetus" can live outside the womb at that point.

Is it a baby at 5-months' gestation?


And what about 20 years from now, when babies at 3-months' gestation are living outside the womb? Will they be "humans" then?



Your answers, please!
Neither of us could possibly answer th e first two questions. A certain human is more important than a questionable one. If you can scientifically prove with some sort of scientific criteria that the whatever is a baby, or isn't a baby, then by all means, do so. Until you can prove it's human, you shouldn't be able to condemn people for drawing their own conclusions about their own bodies, and making their own decisions.

As for the last question, babies who are born six months early rarely survive. If they do, they usually face complications like blindness, mental retardation, brain damage, respiratory difficulties, and heart problems, among other problems.

Here is a chart for survival changes, assuming that the parents have enough money to pay the medical bills.

* 21 weeks or less: 0% survival rate

* 22 weeks: 0-10% survival rate

* 23 weeks: 10-35% survival rate

* 24 weeks: 40-70% survival rate

* 25 weeks: 50-80% survival rate

* 26 weeks: 80-90% survival rate

* 27 weeks: greater than 90% survival rate
Old 05-09-2006, 04:02 PM   #64 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
I only support first trimester abortions.

In humans, parturition normally occurs at a gestational age of 37 to 42 weeks. Childbirth occurring before 37 weeks of gestation is considered preterm and has been associated with 70% of neonatal mortality and 75% of morbidity. A preterm fetus is considered viable only if it is delivered after the 28th week of gestation; before this age, those major developmental events that would allow the fetus to survive outside the womb have not occurred.
Fair enough.

HOWEVER, one of the main arguments of the pro-abortionists is that the baby cannot survive outside the mother's womb.

Well... WHEN that becomes untrue of a baby at 3-months' gestation, WHAT THEN? The argument is destroyed.
Old 05-09-2006, 04:04 PM   #65 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
Neither of us could possibly answer th e first two questions. A certain human is more important than a questionable one. If you can scientifically prove with some sort of scientific criteria that the whatever is a baby, or isn't a baby, then by all means, do so. Until you can prove it's human, you shouldn't be able to condemn people for drawing their own conclusions about their own bodies, and making their own decisions.

As for the last question, babies who are born six months early rarely survive. If they do, they usually face complications like blindness, mental retardation, brain damage, respiratory difficulties, and heart problems, among other problems.

Here is a chart for survival changes, assuming that the parents have enough money to pay the medical bills.

* 21 weeks or less: 0% survival rate

* 22 weeks: 0-10% survival rate

* 23 weeks: 10-35% survival rate

* 24 weeks: 40-70% survival rate

* 25 weeks: 50-80% survival rate

* 26 weeks: 80-90% survival rate

* 27 weeks: greater than 90% survival rate
First of all, you've already stated that you will kill the unborn baby any day and any way, if it is of convenience to the pregnant woman. Therefore, your arguments are rather meaningless to me. You've already justified murder. Period.

Second, your "certain" versus "questionable" human argument is pure BS. Being pregnant does NOT kill a woman. In fact, it RARELY does. With modern medicine, it ALMOST NEVER does. Can you even tell me when you last heard of a woman dying because of pregnancy and/or child-birth? I know you'll scrape up something on some NARAL site, but it's still BS. It virtually NEVER happens in the US.

Third, you're posting medical percentages based on CURRENT information. I already said that I'm talking about 10-20 years down the road. Why does that matter? Because we're currently saving pre-mature babies that, just 20 years ago, were not able to live.

Last edited by Jefferson; 05-09-2006 at 04:06 PM.
Old 05-09-2006, 04:06 PM   #66 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Dylan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,808
Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Level up: 37%, 126 Points needed
Level up: 37% Level up: 37% Level up: 37%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Dylan is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
First of all, you've already stated that you will kill the unborn baby any day and any way, if it is of convenience to the pregnant woman. Therefore, your arguments are rather meaningless to me. You've already justified murder. Period.

Second, you're posting medical percentages based on CURRENT information. I already said that I'm talking about 10-20 years down the road. Why does that matter? Because we're currently saving pre-mature babies that, just 20 years ago, were not able to live.
Just out of curiousity, why do you bother debating? You seem to have already made up your mind, and you're such an asshole to everyone that you don't convince anyone of your viewpoint.

You're one of those people that shouts at the TV, aren't you?
Old 05-09-2006, 04:07 PM   #67 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,687
Country:
Points: 14,509, Level: 78
Points: 14,509, Level: 78 Points: 14,509, Level: 78 Points: 14,509, Level: 78
Level up: 15%, 341 Points needed
Level up: 15% Level up: 15% Level up: 15%
Activity: 11%
Activity: 11% Activity: 11% Activity: 11%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
 
Jefferson I don't think anyone here denies the potential of it to develope into a baby. Obviously in months time, chances are it will develope into a baby. But just because it has this potential doesn't mean it is a human being. Going by your logic would mean that men destroy entire civilizations when they masturbate. Obviously, each sperm has a potential to give life...but I don't see "pro-life" groups seeing to the banning of masturbation. There's the same concept that the sperm in a man's body is a part of his body and therefore he may procede to wack-off.

And Dylan, agreed. I've been saying that, but when I do, people bash me for doing so. I'm not the one being rude to Jefferson here.
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 05-09-2006, 04:08 PM   #68 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
Just out of curiousity, why do you bother debating? You seem to have already made up your mind, and you're such an asshole to everyone that you don't convince anyone of your viewpoint.

You're one of those people that shouts at the TV, aren't you?
Nope, I really don't shout much at all.

Nice try at mind-reading though...


And as for convincing anybody of my viewpoint? That is NEVER my goal. I KNOW that people like you - who are pro-abortion for any and every silly reason - are NOT open to ANYthing else.
Old 05-09-2006, 04:10 PM   #69 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky
Jefferson I don't think anyone here denies the potential of it to develope into a baby. Obviously in months time, chances are it will develope into a baby. But just because it has this potential doesn't mean it is a human being. Going by your logic would mean that men destroy entire civilizations when they masturbate. Obviously, each sperm has a potential to give life...but I don't see "pro-life" groups seeing to the banning of masturbation. There's the same concept that the sperm in a man's body is a part of his body and therefore he may procede to wack-off.

And Dylan, agreed. I've been saying that, but when I do, people bash me for doing so. I'm not the one being rude to Jefferson here.
What does masturbation have to do with anything? Sperm is NOT a pre-born baby. Go back to Biology 101.

And feel free to masturbate all you want. I'm not much interested in that.
Old 05-09-2006, 04:10 PM   #70 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Dylan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,808
Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Level up: 37%, 126 Points needed
Level up: 37% Level up: 37% Level up: 37%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Dylan is offline
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
Nope, I really don't shout much at all.

Nice try at mind-reading though...


And as for convincing anybody of my viewpoint? That is NEVER my goal. I KNOW that people like you - who are pro-abortion for any and every silly reason - are NOT open to ANYthing else.
People like me? Really, what sort of person am I Jefferson? You've already called me a baby-hater, which is catagorically false. Now you're lumping me in with what... Progressives? Communists? I'm all ears.

I'm a very openminded person. That's why I enjoy debate. Because I learn things from it.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites