| CNN Latest News Discuss the latest news released from the CNN Network. The RSS News feeds are updated every 30 minutes. |
12-24-2007, 02:38 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | SIMPLETON
Country: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: In my skin
Gender:
Posts: 7,455
Thanks: 112
Thanked 159 Times in 139 Posts
Points: 20,222, Level: 89 | Level up: 90%, 128 Points needed | | No, because the fire department's job isn't as specific as health care. As we see in California, a fire left to burn can effect many people. Municipal services are far different than health care for the individual.
__________________ |
| |
12-24-2007, 04:15 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Partisan
Country: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles
Gender:
Posts: 8,279
Thanks: 92
Thanked 175 Times in 149 Posts
Points: 24,684, Level: 95 | Level up: 96%, 666 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by pensacola_niceman The patients who are dropped off like thugs are the ones who are poor and have far too many health issues that they are deemed worthy of receiving treatment for. Why waste time and money on some matted hair homeless loser after all - nobody gives a shit except a few hook-nose Nona Mascurri lookalikes. Of course, this has nothing whatsoever to do with how money defines your status and level of "rights" in this country. That's just some silly thing I made up. | How's this for an idea- why not take all those small bottles of hair shampoo confiscated at airports and give them to the homeless people with matted hair?
It wouldn't cost anything, it would boost their self-esteem and at least they would smell good?
Hey come on??
__________________ |
| |
12-25-2007, 03:52 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | The Man You Love to Hate
Country: Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ketchikan, AK
Gender:
Posts: 1,700
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Level up: 53%, 72 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky Anyone can walk into an emergency room and receive care (well, minus the ones that are ignored and in some rare instances, dropped off at random places by the hospital like thugs) because they are required by law to receive care. However, the patient is also required to pay for it. Many can't afford it (including those with insurance). But nice try with the mistruth. | Yes they are required to pay for it. But they do not have to pay before receiving the care. They still get treated and yes then they are billed. Try that with your plumber the next time you pipes burst. Hey fix my pipes and I will pay you later, he'll laugh and leave.
There is no mistruth, the hospital is require by law to provide care, failure to do so can result in a large fine, usually in the range of 6 or 7 figures to that facility.
If the hospital is private again by law they are required to treat a patient that is in dire need, and ensure that the patient it stable before transferring to another facility. Failure to do so would result not only in a fine from the government, but more than likely a huge settlement from a civil court case. This is the reason why so many private hospitals do not offer emergency room services.
The reason healthcare is so expensive is due to third party pay, failure to pay by some who receive treatment, high insurance cost to doctors and facilities to guard against law suits, and the pay out from the ridiculous rewards given in law suits. Like it or not, sometimes good people make mistakes. States have had to pass good samaritan laws in order to protect people, because people have sued those who have tried to help. That says it all. Your wife or husband drops from having a heart attack and someone who knows CPR tries to help, but his efforts fail, wham, the next thing you know your in court being sued and juries fall for the bull shit that comes out of the lawyers mouth.
So again where is the mistruth????? Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky I'm wondering if you'll go back into another health care forum and bash people for 'abusing the system' for going into emergency rooms for simple colds or head aches, and in the same breath you defend this man. That is the hypocrisy I alluded to. | The people I bash are the ones that already are receiving healthcare coverage from the government who do not pay for it. Mr Guiliani has private insurance, and if his insurer deemed that the trip was not worthy of the emergency room visit, would not cover the cost under his policy. The government does not do that, they still foot the bill without ever putting a financial incentive on the individual. Therein lies the difference. With a private insurer, if the trip is not an emergency, they will make you pay, the government still covers the bill.
When you don't have to pay and you abuse the system you deserve the labels I give. You forget, when a person comes in, and I am given the order I can see whether they have Medicare, Medicaid, or Private insurance. The real emergencies we get at night all have private insurance, the colds and other crap, all have Medicaid.
Nice try though, read the posts more carefully next time and don't assume.
dmk
__________________ Conservatism, I repeat is not an ideology. It does not breed fanatics....But if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservative principles -Russell Kirk- |
| |
12-25-2007, 09:48 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Senator
Country: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Pensacola, FL
Gender:
Posts: 4,308
Thanks: 5
Thanked 230 Times in 138 Posts
Points: 12,854, Level: 74 | Level up: 75%, 396 Points needed | | Emergency rooms REALLY HATE IT when something like this walks in.  |
| |
12-29-2007, 01:03 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | The Man You Love to Hate
Country: Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ketchikan, AK
Gender:
Posts: 1,700
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Level up: 53%, 72 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by pensacola_niceman Emergency rooms REALLY HATE IT when something like this walks in.  | Usually they do not walk in, they are deposited on our door by the police department or by the fire department.
dmk
__________________ Conservatism, I repeat is not an ideology. It does not breed fanatics....But if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservative principles -Russell Kirk- |
| |
12-29-2007, 08:16 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Congressional Representative
Country: Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Columbus, OH
Gender:
Posts: 3,474
Thanks: 84
Thanked 206 Times in 112 Posts
Points: 12,146, Level: 72 | Level up: 73%, 304 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski Yes they are required to pay for it. But they do not have to pay before receiving the care. They still get treated and yes then they are billed. Try that with your plumber the next time you pipes burst. Hey fix my pipes and I will pay you later, he'll laugh and leave.
There is no mistruth, the hospital is require by law to provide care, failure to do so can result in a large fine, usually in the range of 6 or 7 figures to that facility.
If the hospital is private again by law they are required to treat a patient that is in dire need, and ensure that the patient it stable before transferring to another facility. Failure to do so would result not only in a fine from the government, but more than likely a huge settlement from a civil court case. This is the reason why so many private hospitals do not offer emergency room services.
The reason healthcare is so expensive is due to third party pay, failure to pay by some who receive treatment, high insurance cost to doctors and facilities to guard against law suits, and the pay out from the ridiculous rewards given in law suits. Like it or not, sometimes good people make mistakes. States have had to pass good samaritan laws in order to protect people, because people have sued those who have tried to help. That says it all. Your wife or husband drops from having a heart attack and someone who knows CPR tries to help, but his efforts fail, wham, the next thing you know your in court being sued and juries fall for the bull shit that comes out of the lawyers mouth.
So again where is the mistruth????? | The mistruth is in your objection to my statement that 'many Americans are unable to enjoy such a simple benefit'.
Even after all of your statements above, my initial contention still remains true. Many Americans (with or without insurance) simply can't go to the hospital for something as simple as a headache (or even something more serious) because they simply can't afford it. Exactly how is that not true?? Quote:
The people I bash are the ones that already are receiving healthcare coverage from the government who do not pay for it. Mr Guiliani has private insurance, and if his insurer deemed that the trip was not worthy of the emergency room visit, would not cover the cost under his policy. The government does not do that, they still foot the bill without ever putting a financial incentive on the individual. Therein lies the difference. With a private insurer, if the trip is not an emergency, they will make you pay, the government still covers the bill.
When you don't have to pay and you abuse the system you deserve the labels I give. You forget, when a person comes in, and I am given the order I can see whether they have Medicare, Medicaid, or Private insurance. The real emergencies we get at night all have private insurance, the colds and other crap, all have Medicaid.
Nice try though, read the posts more carefully next time and don't assume.
dmk
| Indeed, to defend the system is to defend the privileges of the rich and punish the poor for getting punished. Even though Guiliaini pays for his own insurance he still uses up valuable hospital time and resources in his trip to the emergency room so the doctor can tell him to take an aspirin. If you are blind to the inanity of this visit then you are blind to the simple and obvious truth of this situation, and partake in the hypocrisy.
__________________ Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72 |
| |
12-30-2007, 09:22 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Senator
Country: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Pensacola, FL
Gender:
Posts: 4,308
Thanks: 5
Thanked 230 Times in 138 Posts
Points: 12,854, Level: 74 | Level up: 75%, 396 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher How's this for an idea- why not take all those small bottles of hair shampoo confiscated at airports and give them to the homeless people with matted hair? It wouldn't cost anything, it would boost their self-esteem and at least they would smell good? Hey come on?? | The idea would never work. All those little bottles would have to go through customs first. As everybody knows, all customs agents are grossly obese, bald, and only work about 3 hours a day placing little red stamps on documents. |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |