Nader lashes out at Democrats, defends candidacy

CNN.com · 02-25-2008, 01:12 PM

Read full story for latest details.

View the full article here.

NoMoreDems-Reps · 02-25-2008, 10:38 PM

Everyone complains that Nader is running, but nobody (Especially
the New media, GOP, and DNC ) will debate him on his issues !

That's sick, that Americans are so brainwash with our corrupt
political system that they will get upset when a third party
runs !!!!!

People should put Naders platform under scrutiny, Not THE FACT that
our political system is rigged that it only have room for two parties !!!!!!

P.S. Will all you DEMS & REPS pay for all the Independent voters
portion of the National debt that the REPS & DEMS have forced
upon America ??
I'm prety sure it's up to $300,000.00 Per person !

Go "Two Party Monopoly" Go !!!!!!!!! ...............(Go away)

pensacola_niceman · 02-26-2008, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoMoreDems-Reps

Everyone complains that Nader is running, but nobody (Especially
the New media, GOP, and DNC ) will debate him on his issues !

That's because he is a nut case and a huge annoyance. It's also because nobody gives a shit were he stands on the issues. His presidential candidancy has always been a joke. The joke is no longer funny.

garysher · 02-26-2008, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pensacola_niceman

That's because he is a nut case and a huge annoyance. It's also because nobody gives a shit were he stands on the issues. His presidential candidancy has always been a joke. The joke is no longer funny.

If it wasn't for Nader then Gore would probably have won in 2000, and we may have avoided 9/11 and the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans and Iraqis.

A lot of people won't forgive Nader for his egotistical antics.

NoMoreDems-Reps · 02-28-2008, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pensacola_niceman

That's because he is a nut case and a huge annoyance. It's also because nobody gives a shit were he stands on the issues. His presidential candidancy has always been a joke. The joke is no longer funny.

Usually when people call names it's because they really don't have anything to say!

What makes him a nut case , and more importantly is his stances on the issues
good or not?
Nader is not the joke that isn't funny, the corruption of the American Voting system
is!

Gore had more votes but lost!
Clinton only had ~42% of the American vote but 70% of the EC Vote!
That has nothing to do with Nader or any third party, sorry!
Or are you just trying to say you don't want America to have more than two choices
for president?

NoMoreDems-Reps · 02-28-2008, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garysher

If it wasn't for Nader then Gore would probably have won in 2000, and we may have avoided 9/11 and the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans and Iraqis.

A lot of people won't forgive Nader for his egotistical antics.

Oh, I must have missed that one. So your saying that after Nader ran and lost for Pres.
he went and master minded the events of 911 ????? Please continue.....

Or do you mean that Americans should not vote for some one they believe will be the best
leader?

Or should you have said :
Since the US Voting system is corrupt a freaking moron won is stead of the other nim rod
that had more votes.
In which case America most likely would not have created the Cluster $*@& that Bush did
in Iraq.

Or:
The DNC's political platform screwed up it can't even win against fool like Bush!

But to blame it on Nader, that's just not accurate.

Katczinsky · 02-28-2008, 11:10 PM

It's equivalent to Democrats playing victim by blaming their failures on the Republicans getting independent votes. It just doesn't work that way. It's been the Democrat's election to win or lose for the last two elections, and even factoring in Nader's (at the greatest) 1 percent and voting fraud in Florida and Ohio, the Democrats lost it. The more the Democrats play victim and the more they put off accepting responsibility for their own campaigns the longer it will be before they actually win an election.

pensacola_niceman · 02-29-2008, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garysher

If it wasn't for Nader then Gore would probably have won in 2000, and we may have avoided 9/11 and the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans and Iraqis.

What a load of bullshit!

garysher · 02-29-2008, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoMoreDems-Reps

Oh, I must have missed that one. So your saying that after Nader ran and lost for Pres.
he went and master minded the events of 911 ????? Please continue.....

Nope.

I'm saying that if Nader hadn't run in 2000 then Gore would have probably won.

Had Gore won there's a much greater chance that 9/11 could have been avoided. Gore had access to all the intelligence throughout the Clinton presidency.

Clinton's people begged Bush to take Al Qaeda seriously.

Bush decided to take a vacation instead - and the rest is history.