Defending the Truth

Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Latest News > CNN Latest News

CNN Latest News Discuss the latest news released from the CNN Network. The RSS News feeds are updated every 30 minutes.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2007, 12:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
Guest
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 886
Points: 12,655, Level: 73
Points: 12,655, Level: 73 Points: 12,655, Level: 73 Points: 12,655, Level: 73
Level up: 52%, 195 Points needed
Level up: 52% Level up: 52% Level up: 52%
Activity: 51%
Activity: 51% Activity: 51% Activity: 51%
CNN.com is offline
Reply With Quote
Pelosi will get plane but not the one she wants
Read full story for latest details.

View the full article here.
Sponsored Links
Old 02-08-2007, 02:14 PM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,345
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
The Pelosi camp is denying that she wanted the C-32, which is basically an ultra-luxury version of the 757-200, and costs the American taxpayers $22,000 per hour to operate.

Former House Speaker Hastert flew in a C-20, which is a 12-seat jet.

The problem, claimed by Pelosi, is that the C-20 might not be able to fly non-stop from Washington DC to San Fransisco. But hey, if security during re-fueling is her concerning, why couldn't they just stop and re-fuel at some little po-dunk town out in the middle of nowhere. I mean, good grief, do we really think there are a lot of potential terrorists in, say, North Platte, Nebraska?

What Hastert flew in:


What Pelosi wants to use:


Or how about making ALL our Congressmen & woman fly commercial? The flights are going to happen anyway - so why create extra air traffic and pollution?

Last edited by Jefferson; 02-08-2007 at 02:20 PM.
Old 02-08-2007, 06:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
chrisg967's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Gender: Female
Posts: 834
Points: 3,877, Level: 39
Points: 3,877, Level: 39 Points: 3,877, Level: 39 Points: 3,877, Level: 39
Level up: 52%, 73 Points needed
Level up: 52% Level up: 52% Level up: 52%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
chrisg967 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
I'll second that suggestion to have them fly commercial like the rest of us.
Old 02-08-2007, 08:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
Website Owner
Administrator
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,944
Country:
Thanks: 11
Thanked 63 Times in 55 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
RidinHighSpeeds is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson View Post
Or how about making ALL our Congressmen & woman fly commercial? The flights are going to happen anyway - so why create extra air traffic and pollution?
Hear Hear!
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites