teacher

So...


Care to rephrase that now?

286 posts I have on this topic CB.

How you like the first


five?

teacher

This guys life depends on his saying the terrorists couldn't fly those planes...



One little tidbit. Alan, really, your comment about the 19 couldn't fly planes? I thought they took some lessons. As always I try to only speak mostly from experience. Several times I've been given the yoke of an already airborne and trimmed out plane. Piece of cake. Up down left right is easy at that point. I could have flown the planes in my control into stuff, (where you live alan?). Landing and takeoff are the tricky parts. Way to keep bringing those rock solid, logic based, fact filled arguments. Top ten about can't see the forest for the trees maybe...

teacher

A guy asks me, ME (see, now it's apparent on that site that I'm The Man, so they now ask ME about what I think about this or that...)

about...

wait for it...

Reynolds. Morgan that is...Dr. Hack.

The date of this post?

06-24-05, 06:35 PM

Yes, CB_Brooklyn, while ago eh?

Guess what?

I know more now.

continue...

Yes he seems legit. A legitimate Doctor of FRIGGIN ECONOMICS. Listen, who you gonna believe? A bean counter or someone experienced in structural rigging, a metal fabricator, and a certified Fire alarm technician. I've serviced Fire alarms in some of the tallest buildings in Ft. Lauderdale and Miami. I am supposed to know something about fire. He's supposed to know the difference in gross and net. I read his stuff from yet another link by alan. I love when he does that, pure fodder. He's wrong. He's wrong with his suppositions of initial damage, the chronology of other failures, fire temperature, steel behavior, and on. But I'd rather pick on Reynolds in response to alan. Soon now...he he he...

teacher

Know any thing about the now famous "pull it" quote?

CB, where you at?

A guy named Mr. brooks tries this with me.

Here's the deal CB. They would come and go. Try their stuff and I sent them packing.


0 for what is the score now? Dunno. All of them. You guys should stop pointing me at these sites. I just use your data against you. Very short clip. Won't pick and choose, just rip all. It starts by saying that 7 was cleared quickly and first. And there were bodies. Are they implying it was cleared quickly to hide evidence? The dolts shot down their own implication the very next sentence. And there were no bodies. Duh. It was cleared quickly BECAUSE there were no bodies to slow work for identification. Then Silvertounge says the FD told him the building was a lost cause because of fire. So let me get this right. At the drop of a dime they rigged this whole building that fast. Your boy states that it was a on the spot decision. Not planned. Lets say for a moment his words are correct. What he is saying is the building was dropped in a controlled fashion. Better that then to fall sideways. Your very "evidence"is in no way even slightly connected to your premise of a conspiracy. Did you watch this clip? English can be a concise language. Or do you purport he speaks with innuendos. Even if 7 was dropped on purpose then at best it was for safety or for this particular guy to get paid. And that would be mighty quick thinking on his part. Which Fire authority? Names, titles or what. Might just have to dig into Silverdude to find out what his reason may be for saying this. Although it always comes down to money, defense of ones actions, or just plain evil. There is always a reason. They couldn't keep Watergate, Whitewater gate, of Iran contra quiet, how could something this big be hushed. Someone would spill the beans just for the money. Sorry Mr. Brooks. (or should I say mini-alan) I gave it an honest look. Not even close. Why do you foil hatters want so fervently to believe this? Again if it were all true that pesky little 2nd amendment you libs so despise would come in handy. Ironic, isn't it?

teacher

So this friggin guy alan keeps going on and on about Reynolds.

He lives and dies by Reynolds his "source".

You so do not want to play duesling sourses with me...


But really the links? How about you come to your own conclusions based on various data and if we doubt some bit we'll ask for reference. Funny I'm never asked to cite references that I recall. How about your way. Link. PBS. Show. NOVA. Why the towers fell. Specifically the comments by the towers head designer. My source: the guy who designed the FRIGGIN BUILDINGS. Your source: An economist. Am I missing something here? Do I just not get it. Name one piece of relevant evidence I have not shot down? Why are you so stuck on this? I gots to know. 5/8"?

teethandclaws

teacher, what is up with your 10 posts in a row? I think that is really unfair to others who have well thought out posts that contain a lot of meaningful information who only get credit for one post.

teacher

What, you get a prize for more posts?

I wrote the book on this topic two years ago..

20,000 views plus and not any flaws in my description posted yet. I know this topic. So when CB says I don't, I figured I'd show him the error of his way.

Is beer one of the prizes? If not, I hearby give the credit for my ten posts to teethand claws.

I'm still not banned. I think this site deserves a reward for that.

Any one know anything about pyramids?

I do. Even more than I do about 9/11 WTC collapse.

Are there any girls here?

(In the voice of Jerry Lewis) "Hey ladies".

Hio

No kidding, if you want to get your point across keep it within a 3 post margin. You are making posts out of thin air, and i say that meaning no one has replied to any one of the first you made so whats the point with the others?

__________________
What Profit Is It To A Man...If He Gains The World But Loses His Own Soul {Matthew 16:26}

teacher

You telling me how to get read?

Science &Technology - Debate Politics Forums

Check the views and then get back to me on that.

What's the point? CB's utter destruction. These 9/11 guys glaze over what ever I destroy and then go to the next. Now he has no next. it's the whole shebang in one fell swoop.

You're one of those jealous envious types, aren't you?

How about I go find your posts, don't comment on the merit or subject matter of validity of the content and instead critique your style, or lack there of.

I'm gonna start a new thread.

Just try and bring sumpin to the dance.

tyreay

Making a point and sounding like a raving lunatic are two different things. Did CB respond to you yet? No answer needed. Not that I agree with CB but you actually make him sound less ludacrous than you!

__________________
Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour

There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. ~Alexis de Tocqueville