knot_e_lady

Here ya go:

Clementine Photos

The Clementine Lunar orbiter has taken photographs of the moon's surface. They're not detailed enough to see any small features on the surface such as a lunar module, but that hasn't stopped people looking.
This is a composite picture of the area that Apollo 15 landed in. This mission spent 3 days on the moon's surface, far longer than earlier missions. This gave the astronauts more time to stir up dust in the surrounding area. This, coupled with the disturbance cause by the lander's rockets made enough of a mark on the lunar surface to be just visible on the photograph. The dark spot indicated by arrow A corresponds exactly to that landing site. Arrows B & C show recent meteor impacts.
Now I'd be the first to admit that this isn't conclusive proof, but still evidence and the clearest pictures we're going to get until the SELENE mission.

Clementine Satellite Photos

highway80west

This whole argument gotten pretty silly, hasn't it?

Of course, guys like "Intangible" only want to start this silly argument just to see themselves get contradicted on purpose. That's like a skinhead saying that the holocaust never existed, which we know it did. (Oh no, here come the conspiracy theorists).

__________________
Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. Psalm 119:105

John

Just because there is no atmosphere on the moon doesn't mean the landing site couldn't have been wiped away. There are some things that happen in space that cannot be explained.

__________________
"The Cavaliers are my hero's!!"
-Anti-Choice57 and John on a Band trip to Texas after The Cavaliers won the 2006 DCI World Championchips.

VOTE
John '28
"A Leader with a vision..."


http://www.freewebs.com/johnforpresident

highway80west

Well, I guess I will have to watch the Sci_fi channel and view the X-Files.

__________________
Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. Psalm 119:105

John

HAha funny. The site could have been wiped away from the shock wave of an exploding planet, or a collapsing star. There are also solar flares that could have wiped them away. Both shockwave and flare act as wind in space.

__________________
"The Cavaliers are my hero's!!"
-Anti-Choice57 and John on a Band trip to Texas after The Cavaliers won the 2006 DCI World Championchips.

VOTE
John '28
"A Leader with a vision..."


http://www.freewebs.com/johnforpresident

highway80west

Well, we'll never know until NASA (or whatever space agency there is) sends more men/women to the moon. I don't disagree with you on your post. Solar flares and solar wind.

__________________
Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. Psalm 119:105

knot_e_lady

Actually, I did post a picture of the Apollo 15 landing sight. This landing was longer (3 days) and more active then any other landing. They roamed around the surface with the little car, stirring up a bit of dust. Any other landing sites are just too small to be seen with the technology that we currently have.

highway80west

You must be as big a fan of the NASA moon landings as I am, Knot. There wasn't much dust at the landing sites at the "Sea/Ocean" area. But you're right. There had to been a lot of dust in the highlands.

And anyway, the Hubble needs to be repaired, too. Charles Duke talked to me about his experience on the moon. He was also the backup crew for Apollo 11.

__________________
Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. Psalm 119:105

knot_e_lady

Hopefully to put this to rest once and for all.... On July 3rd, NGC repeated the show 'Conspiracy Moon Landing?' I made sure I watched it this time. Very interesting.

They had on there two of the conspiracy theorists. First, this one:

Bill Kaysing: Bill Kaysing

I would like to point out that in the show, this old guy lives in a trailer with about 30 cats. Every one of his theories was debunked by the real experts in the show.

Next, Ralph Rene:
Another guy who wants to sell you something, except Ralph has a book he'd like you to purchase. Content wise you won't find anything original, and plenty of poor science. Mr Rene's qualifications amount to being a "self taught engineer". I can only guess that by this he'd like you to think he's something like Issac Newton or something. Unfortunately all his daft theories and bizarre conclusions only show just how valuable a good education is. And research, it's valuable too, but it's a concept that Rene seems unfamiliar with. He'd rather guess and make things up.
You'll not be surprised to hear that Ralph's book is self published. But that hasn't stopped it becoming something of a bible for crank sites across the web.

The interesting thing about these two men is they make all these claims, yet have absolutely no proof at all. Bill Kaysing even talks about how the moon rocks were faked by some as yet unidentified ceramics lab that Nasa has.

Also, one of the experiments that Apollo 11 set up was a set of mirrors that a laser could be bounced off of from earth. FYI, this laser bouce has been happening roughly 240 times a year, every year since 1969. The man who runs the project kind of laughed and said "I don't know why these conspiracy people just don't ask me."

SignOnSanDiego.com > News > Science -- Shooting the moon

John

I could really care less what they say. We went to the moon, why is that so hard for people to believe. If the Russians could put a man in orbit, why couldn't we send someone to the moon?

__________________
"The Cavaliers are my hero's!!"
-Anti-Choice57 and John on a Band trip to Texas after The Cavaliers won the 2006 DCI World Championchips.

VOTE
John '28
"A Leader with a vision..."


http://www.freewebs.com/johnforpresident