Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths

highway80west · 05-10-2008, 03:14 PM

People, let's cool our jets (no pun intended), shall we? No need to get out of control here. Just a friendly word of advice for a Saturday.

John · 05-10-2008, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grace

A person who comes in a thread just to attack someone without being a part of the OT is a troll. That isnt name calling, that is fact finding.

First off, this is a free forum, and they can come here and do as they please. I'm almost positive that Ali... made some contribution.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grace

LOL, disprove? You havent even said a single relevent thing in this thread kid. You would make a good president, lol

I have, shows how much you read the posts. It seems you post what you want, don't read what other people have written and call them names. I'd be a better president than you would, by a mile...or two, possibly 500.

Oh, and I'm not a kid. I've outgrown that. I'm a young adult, you the one acting like a kid.

Grace · 05-11-2008, 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John

First off, this is a free forum, and they can come here and do as they please. I'm almost positive that Ali... made some contribution.

Yes she made some contributions, till she was proven wrong on a few points, then she reduced herself to being a troll. I never said people werent free to come here and be trolls, Im just calling a spade a spade.

Quote:

I have, shows how much you read the posts. It seems you post what you want, don't read what other people have written and call them names. I'd be a better president than you would, by a mile...or two, possibly 500.

Maybe you would, I never wanted to run for president, so wether I'd make a good one really isnt relevent. But forgive me, you did make 2 comments that are relevent to the topic, from there on you became a troll.

Quote:

Oh, and I'm not a kid. I've outgrown that. I'm a young adult, you the one acting like a kid.

LOL, forgive me for not being impressed.

Grace · 05-11-2008, 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by highway80west

People, let's cool our jets (no pun intended), shall we? No need to get out of control here. Just a friendly word of advice for a Saturday.

I wanted to stay on topic highway, but that was just to hard for some.

John · 05-11-2008, 03:06 PM

Then why didn't you just leave? Grace, you're the one whose being a troll. And you're not that impressive either. Why would you call people a troll anyway? It's rude. Why not just ask them to stop. You're stooping to a third grade level. People put in worthy information, they disagree with you, and you're like, "well, you're a troll! Ha ha! I feel special inside now! I insulted you. I post the same things over and over expecting people to agree. But they didn't and I called you a troll. I'M SUPERIOR!"
That's pretty much all we hear from you, don't attack people. Try some nice conversation and people wouldn't hate you so much. If you don't like it just leave. You're not bound by God to stay here. I hope you don't teach this to your kids.

Grace · 05-12-2008, 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John

Then why didn't you just leave? Grace, you're the one whose being a troll. And you're not that impressive either. Why would you call people a troll anyway? It's rude. Why not just ask them to stop. You're stooping to a third grade level. People put in worthy information, they disagree with you, and you're like, "well, you're a troll! Ha ha! I feel special inside now! I insulted you. I post the same things over and over expecting people to agree. But they didn't and I called you a troll. I'M SUPERIOR!"
That's pretty much all we hear from you, don't attack people. Try some nice conversation and people wouldn't hate you so much. If you don't like it just leave. You're not bound by God to stay here. I hope you don't teach this to your kids.

I never called anyone a troll till the focus was strictly on me, and not OT. I never called anyone a troll for disagreeing with me. So pretty much everything you said here is total BS. But then you get pass for being a child.

knot_e_lady · 05-12-2008, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grace

Well no one has dealt with building 7, no one has dealt with the fact that there was tons of melted metal found cleaning up the towers. AP gave one total BS excuse as to why the main support beams were all cut at 45 degree angles, covered with melted steel, but like I said, it was BS. No one said anything about how a demolition expert said for certain building 7 was demolished, other than to try and discredit him. And last but not least, no one has dealt with motive.

Answered in previous posts, previous threads.

Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report - Popular Mechanics

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7, Building 7
I suggest you read something from a reputable source instead of these crazies and their wild theories.

Grace · 05-12-2008, 09:12 AM

Wow knot, I cant believe it. So much to the point where I had to thank you for going back to the OT, instead of continuing the assult on me. I still dont see how building 7 fell the same exact way controlled demolition would have brought it down, but at least you are on topic.

My problem is, there claim is that parts of the building were damaged, and it was enough to bring the entire building down, and that may have so. But if the dammage was tward the bottom, on one side, why didnt the building tip over? If it was how they said it was, the building certainly would have tipped over and fell face down, gravity demands its. Physics demands it. Another thing, why would fire be relevent at all? There wasnt any jet fuel in it. Pleanty of steel structures have been on fire before, and till 9/11 none of them have ever fell.

Grace · 05-12-2008, 09:22 AM

And I have yet to see a explaination as to why the center beams caved in first? You notice when the building fell, the center of the roof kind of kinked inward, how was that possible from damage made to the lower corner?

knot_e_lady · 05-12-2008, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grace

Wow knot, I cant believe it. So much to the point where I had to thank you for going back to the OT, instead of continuing the assult on me. I still dont see how building 7 fell the same exact way controlled demolition would have brought it down, but at least you are on topic.

My problem is, there claim is that parts of the building were damaged, and it was enough to bring the entire building down, and that may have so. But if the dammage was tward the bottom, on one side, why didnt the building tip over? If it was how they said it was, the building certainly would have tipped over and fell face down, gravity demands its. Physics demands it. Another thing, why would fire be relevent at all? There wasnt any jet fuel in it. Pleanty of steel structures have been on fire before, and till 9/11 none of them have ever fell.

There were diesel tanks throughout that building. These were for emergency generators.

Good Lord, don't you know how to use google? Yes, plenty of steel structures have been on fire before, but seldom on fire for 20+ hours with absolutely no attempt to put the fire out.

Also, the architecture of WTC7 did not lend itself well to any loss of support at all.

Just read, okay? And not the half-truths the conspiracy theorists put out, but actual scientific studies. Did you even click on the links I supplied?