James Fetzer on Hannity & Colmes

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/M...nityColmes.wmv

I am too stupid to tell you the point of posting this link so you will just have to click it to
find out why I posted it and why I think you should click it.

ok Thanks

Guarentee it that if I took James Fetzer's class and disagreed with his thoughts of 9/11, he would have failed me.

If you believe that the Towers fell because of fire....you would deserve it.

Please don't tell me you believe the towers were brought down by demolitions...seriously?? So I guess the Bush administration hired Al Qaeda to hijack the planes to fly them into buildings...All it will ever be is a weak conspiracy theory.

No, no... nonLucidthoughts doesn't believe that.

He believes that martians with lazer beams came and destroyed them. He's spent far too much time sitting on his couch drinking cheap beer and watching "Mars Attacks".

Scientific analysis has already proven that thermate was used in the buildings. There has already been witness accounts and video evidence to explosives; but now there is concrete scientific evidence of incendiaries.

Whether or not you believe it or not, I believe this should at least make people give the alternate 9/11 scenerio probabilities credence. Doing otherwise would to be closing your mind and submiting to preconcieved notions.

BYU Physics Prof. finds thermate

Scientific Analysis Proves Towers Brought Down By Incendiaries

Interview with professor Steven Jones

The professor Steven Jones brings up even more good points, which many havn't heard before. Including the fact that NIST, the official laboratory that studied the collapses, contracted with Underwriters Laboratories (the company that certified the steel componets used in the constuction of the WTC towers) to test actual scale models of the floor trusses as they were in the WTC; and subject them to intense fire indurance tests. And guess what, the models did not collapse. But of coarse you don't hear about this in the mainstream.

MIT Engineer Explains WTC Controlled Demolition

Probably because the government wanted to cover up the fact that al-Qaeda operatives were able to infiltrate the towers and plant explosives.

This is the conclusion I have made. Most people who agree there is some kind of conspiracy or that the official story isn't true struck this idea down immediately even though it is no less impractical than the entire theory that the Neocons orchestrated it all. Actually it makes a lot more sense and is more practical...gosh.

For some odd reason every time I read stuff like this thread I keep hearing in my head the theme for Twilight zone. Do any of you conspiracy theorists have any idea why that is?

By the way, that "professor" looks like he just got off a hog farm and put on a clean shirt. If you ask me, he's a couple tacos short of a combination plate.

Actually the Bush Administration is a puppet government for the Rockefeller Empire.

The Government was hiJAcked by the Globalists long ago....now they are using terror to get you to beg them for a police state and to fight foreign wars on their behalf.

You have been duped!


-------------

Lucidthots, I have heard that theory many times over again; but I have yet to see any conclusive evidence that our government is run by a bunch of sick blood-thirsty, globalist, satanists. Until then I'm ignoring those who wear the tin-foil hats.