Defending the Truth

Exactly, the plane is made of aluminum and it was supposed to penetrate through three rings (6 layers) of reinforced concrete, and focalize into a small whole at the last layer? Get a brain.

And if the plane debris and the wings are supposed to be completely destroyed, then how is it possible that things such as chairs, desks, and even papers that were exposed after the crash don't even get burned? Also, if the planes were supposedly disintegrated, then how is it possible that the government found one of the hijackers' passports amidst the debris? Its just utterly moronic to believe some of this crap.

Where are the passengers and the pilots?

That's a good question. Because they weren't found at the Pentagon.

No one was found because they were burned to ash. So where are the passengers and the pilots?

How were they burned to ash, and at the same time be able to find one of the hijacker's passports at the crash site? Come on man, how can you believe that?

And why are you asking me, I didn't do it, I wouldn't know where they are.

Aluminum wings, filled with fuel, would NOT be "just sitting on the lawn" after a fiery crash. Get a brain.

Okay. So you don't know where the passengers and the pilots are, but you are convinced they didn't die in the crash. That leaves a very very big hole in your theory. In fact, a hole big enough to fly a passenger jet through.

No, its not a hole in a theory at all. We know the official story isn't truthful, so we want another and actual impartial investigation. They would deal with that question. Although the best and most factually and eye-witness based answer that I have seen so far is featured in Loose Change, 2nd Edition. It details the account of at least one plane, at the events of Cleveland Hopkins Airport.

See the entire video here.

Okay. So you know the official story isn't truthful according to you. Now tell us where the passengers and the pilots are. Thanks.

Are you really so thick? Do you really think to keep asking me that question will make any of my facts I presented in this thread any less substantiated? Do you really think it makes the official story any more credible?

I, and all people who are questioning 9/11, weren't "in" on it, and thus have no idea where they would go. We have exposed lies and inconsistencies of the offical story, and we are therefore calling for the re-opening (or actually, opening for the first time) of true 9/11 investigations. Those investigations would deal with that question, just as they would any other question. Just because we exposed the inconsistancies and lies of the official story, doesn't mean we have all the answers.

I could just as easily keep asking you the question, "So where is all the debris? Where are the black boxes?"