Yes.
The "video shots" I've seen are from a camera that monitors who drives in and out. It's supposed to take pictures of people in vehicles - probably triggered by those vehicles' motion. Gee, what a surprise that it doesn't show an airplane.

Sigh. I will never know then.

I havent got a clue what you mean Jefferson,you just show up with terms of crap ,not giving answers to any questions and come with a couple of stupid questions,then if i still take the effort to answer some
You again pop up ,TOTALLY IGNORING i have answered a few of your questions I aint gonna aanswer anymore of your STUPID questions. READ!!
So consider it the last time i do a one way discussion with you
From now on i will ignore you
DONT BOTHER!!!

And high speed now you too????
OF COURSE THERE FLEW PLANES IN THE WTC!!


LOOK, READ, WAKE UP, Something is wrong and i dont know the right version too!! Only that the official is bull
Funny to see that so many have a comment ready here without even LOOKING at the question list (DOWLOADED ONCE)
GUESS THAT GIVES ALL A WELL FUNDED OPINION!!!!
Was the rest of your opinion also that quickly formed? LOL
Mine took months...

I'll say it just one more time: READ THE PREVIOUS THREADS IN THIS SUB-FORUM.

Maybe YOU feel like having a fight, but there have already been a whole bunch of them on this forum. If you want to learn about it, just read them.

I, for one, am really not interested in debating/discussing this with yet another closed-minded person who is absolutely sure the American government "pulled something off" here. It's like talking to a Jehova's Witness.

The doubt is about a plane hitting the Pentagon,NOT THE WTC
Why were all camera's out of work?,(same as on all the other places) there are hundreds, and why within minutes(standin ready) petrol station owners had to deliver their security camera's to the CIA?,and where not allowed to speak about what was on it?, and why did the plane(?) made a violent turn to hit the Pentagon at a empty place?,exactly opposite rumsfeld!,why did the anti missile defence not work?.why there was no debri? no airplane chairs?,no body?,s,no engine tail? , no wings? NOTHING !! Only some small pieces.why could NOT 1 dog even find a drip of blood???,how come that the plane was much to big for such a small opening.?? Why did many people never see a plane but heard a wooosh,why are all these confiscated video images never returned or released?
These are just some questions out of my head but the list's are endless, and full with even better questions.
After all even the mayor of Shanksville who was at the sight as one of the first said "there was nothing but a hole in the ground..."
Again no debri no this no that no nothing!!

Any body that seriously and unbiassed really DIVES whole heartedly in this
issue comes out with numerous totally unexplanable questions.Garanteed!!
Dont look at the implications like.... BUT THAT WOULD MEAN....!
Only look at the facts and see what the official answers are on these..
Then let you logic work! WTC 7 is a good place to start.
I have read here and everywhere and this thing hasnt even begun to lift its curtains yet,what is behind there i would not know..
Sometimes i wonder if i ever will..

I'm not finding the suggestion that there were no planes flying into the twin towers in the two text documents Prototype posted. So it might be he's not suggesting the planes were not commercial planes. Hence no need to explain where the people went from the flights. (although I'm thinking about how the EPA didn't care enough about the citizens of NYC to issue the real air quality report post 9/11... or was that someone in the administration who doctored the report?)

I was noting the discrepancy between the damage to the Pentagon and the size of the jetliner that flew into it. Had surveillance tapes been available that definitely showed me the plane hitting the building, I'd shut up and chalk it up to me not understanding physics. And I'd be in a better position to say, "look here: it really was a plane. I don't get why there wasn't more damage, but it really was a plane."

As for rigging the building, I have read that there were fire drills and other events in the WTC buildings before 9/11, which might give someone time to set a few charges, but not much.

I'm still looking for the 400+ questions the 9/11 families posed the 9/11 Commission (as mentioned in part 2 of the text docs in the first post here on DTT). Haven't found them....

Did find this interesting website that lists people who want the investigation re-opened: Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
Included on that site is
We might ask Capt. Wittenberg what he thinks happened to the people on Flight 77 then.

Yep i have read that report too, there's more aviation people saying the same thing.German ministers say it is a set up,A British(former) minister, Then there's professors,Several international Arhitects,Someone high up in the former Reagan admin.And even more who dont dare or arent allowed to speak up.
There's are many fire man talking about hearing bombs that they werent even allowed in the room the "hearings" took place would you believe.
The best first hand witnesses!
Then shipping all rubble to india? In guarded convoy's?? etc..
There's no end to the questions and not a single reasonable answer other as already told.It stinks..

So the Germans and British (or at least one or two of them) are sayinig it was a set-up. Well, I guess that settles it.


I want you to answer the following question: What happened to Flight 77?
- Where are the passengers?
- Where is the Boeing 757?

I have seen some stubborn people but you beat em all jefferson

You just keep ignoring the questions,or my anser to yours even(!)
Simply continue launching your own, as if i have to know everything ....(or would react,after that). And dont ever stop calling all the
unanswered questions crap ,(why should you?You have outstanding 100% honest news coverage!!! And at least it is always a constructive begin of an argument!) You just firmly keep lauching yours.And never look into anything, dont bother.Just keep discussing the things you dont have the patience to read 2 text files about.(Great attitude on a truth forum!)
I bet you have a very well funded opinion about everything but i aint interested in your tunnel vision no more. So if you really can't stop launching your own questions, i suggest you make a 911 post of your own! I hope i can successfully avoid you from now on.

You know we all have questions that nobody is willing to answer. However, those that believe that the government conspired in the 9/11 attacks and that the damage done was not done by hijackers have ignored all questions. Well yes, the government has ignored some, others they have answered.

Until such time as the conspiracy theoriests answer questions like what happened to the passengers on Flight 77 or how do they explain a WTC engineer calling the Fire Department requesting a structural engineer from the 78 floor of WTC 1, because he saw structural damage, their credibility is severely lacking. These are just a few of the loop holes that they continue to ignore.

They want answers, well they should provide answers as well.

dmk