Defending the Truth

Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Drugs and Alcohol
Ashcroft's Nephew Got Probation After Major Pot Bust

Drugs and Alcohol Debate and defend your political beliefs of whether or not some drugs should be illegal or legalized.

Reply
Page 3 of 4 < 12 3 4 >
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-30-2006, 01:24 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,844
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
So you and your sissy liberal girls are trying to prove some "family connection" that got an Ashcroft out of serving his time in a drug bust.
Do you have a better explanation?
Do you have a better explanation as to how a "tough on drugs" state suddenly went soft when it comes to the GOVERNOR'S NEPHEW???

No? But you feel comfortable mocking those who see a connection when you have no better explanation for what happened...
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Sponsored Links
Old 05-30-2006, 01:29 PM   #22 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,345
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
Do you have a better explanation?
Do you have a better explanation as to how a "tough on drugs" state suddenly went soft when it comes to the GOVERNOR'S NEPHEW???

No? But you feel comfortable mocking those who see a connection when you have no better explanation for what happened...
I have something better. A quote from the article itself!
Quote:
There's no evidence Ashcroft intervened on behalf of his nephew
Do you understand that?
Old 05-30-2006, 01:43 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,844
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
I have something better. A quote from the article itself!
Do you understand that?
Yes. I do understand that.
And if a hotel employee hadn't noticed something amiss at the Watergate, it's very possible that those break-ins would have had "no evidence" either...

Now can you explain, with a more credible explanation, as to why the governor's nephew got off on a lessened sentence when the governor is "tough on drugs"?

Or are you going to keep ignoring that question over and over again?
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 05-30-2006, 01:48 PM   #24 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,345
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
Yes. I do understand that.
And if a hotel employee hadn't noticed something amiss at the Watergate, it's very possible that those break-ins would have had "no evidence" either...

Now can you explain, with a more credible explanation, as to why the governor's nephew got off on a lessened sentence when the governor is "tough on drugs"?

Or are you going to keep ignoring that question over and over again?
No, I cannot. And neither can you.


However, unlike you, I do not make wildly STUPID accusations.


But keep ignoring this quote from the article:
Quote:
There's no evidence Ashcroft intervened on behalf of his nephew
Old 05-30-2006, 01:57 PM   #25 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,844
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
No, I cannot. And neither can you.
Actually, yes. I can.
It's just that my explanation, as you keep pointing out, lacks evidence.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
However, unlike you, I do not make wildly STUPID accusations.
There is nothing "wildly STUPID" about thinking that the governor could have been involved in getting his nephew a reduced sentence.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
But keep ignoring this quote from the article:
I have ignored nothing my little simpleton.
My response: "And if a hotel employee hadn't noticed something amiss at the Watergate, it's very possible that those break-ins would have had "no evidence" either..."

Do you need me to spell it out to you what that means?
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 05-30-2006, 02:18 PM   #26 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,345
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
Actually, yes. I can.
It's just that my explanation, as you keep pointing out, lacks evidence.



There is nothing "wildly STUPID" about thinking that the governor could have been involved in getting his nephew a reduced sentence.



I have ignored nothing my little simpleton.
My response: "And if a hotel employee hadn't noticed something amiss at the Watergate, it's very possible that those break-ins would have had "no evidence" either..."

Do you need me to spell it out to you what that means?
But there's a little problem for people like you...
Quote:
There's no evidence Ashcroft intervened on behalf of his nephew.
Old 05-30-2006, 02:24 PM   #27 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,491
Country:
Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Level up: 89%, 113 Points needed
Level up: 89% Level up: 89% Level up: 89%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hevusa is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
But there's a little problem for people like you...

Actually the evidence is that ANYONE ELSE would have gone to jail for a very long time.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

"There is no such thing as laziness. Laziness is only lack of incentive." Norman Reider, MD

Morality is not contingent on religion to exist. Therefore religion only detracts from the purity of morality.
Old 05-30-2006, 02:25 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,844
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
But there's a little problem for people like you...
I recently heard a comment that seems rather fitting...

If a murder case lacks a body, that could just mean that the murderer accomplished precisely what he set out to do...

And the "little problem" for people like you is that there is no other real rational explanation as to how Ascroft's nephew got off with such a ridiculously light sentence...


Jefferson, do you think that anybody is noticing how I am addressing your reply, but you keep avoiding mine...
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 05-30-2006, 03:43 PM   #29 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,345
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Actually the evidence is that ANYONE ELSE would have gone to jail for a very long time.
Another liberal ASSumption.

Quote:
There's no evidence Ashcroft intervened on behalf of his nephew.
Old 05-30-2006, 03:45 PM   #30 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,345
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
I recently heard a comment that seems rather fitting...

If a murder case lacks a body, that could just mean that the murderer accomplished precisely what he set out to do...

And the "little problem" for people like you is that there is no other real rational explanation as to how Ascroft's nephew got off with such a ridiculously light sentence...


Jefferson, do you think that anybody is noticing how I am addressing your reply, but you keep avoiding mine...
You have NOTHING but your own speculation and inuendo.

Apparently you think that's enough. But nobody in any legal profession would give it the time of day.


Grow up.

Quote:

There's no evidence Ashcroft intervened on behalf of his nephew.
Reply
Page 3 of 4 < 12 3 4 >

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 PM.

Defending the Truth - FAQ - Contact Us - Donate - Archive - Top

 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites 

Recommended Sites