Defending the Truth

  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Elections and Candidates

Elections and Candidates Debate anything about current elections or candidates running for any position in office.

View Poll Results: For what third-party would you vote for in a Democratic election in America?
Libertarian Party 1 10.00%
Green Party 5 50.00%
Reform Party 1 10.00%
Constitution Party 0 0%
Socialist Party USA 1 10.00%
Independent 1 10.00%
Other 1 10.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2006, 05:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,519
Points: 12,633, Level: 73
Points: 12,633, Level: 73 Points: 12,633, Level: 73 Points: 12,633, Level: 73
Level up: 46%, 217 Points needed
Level up: 46% Level up: 46% Level up: 46%
Activity: 25%
Activity: 25% Activity: 25% Activity: 25%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
Third Party Election
Lets face it, many of us are fustrated with the two party system. Its existence proves our fake democracy in our country. So let us say that we actually install true democracy in our country, reflecting many countries in Europe today, for what party would you vote for?

I'll list some of the major third parties.

For me I think its a split between the Socialist Party and Green Party. I liked a lot of what 2004 Libertarian Party Presidential Candidate Michael Badnarik had to say about the current issues with the current administration, but once I actually looked into the Libertarian Party's plans and views, I saw that they were planning on some pretty bad stuff, although much of it was good. The Green Party seemed the best to me during the 2004 Election, so I'll vote for them in this poll. I mostly associate myself with the Democratic Socialists, but the Socialist candidate during 2004 was just so rediculously weak. He wasted like 2 minutes of his speaking time during the third party Presidential debates searching through a pile of papers for notes. And he looked like he was going to roll over and die at any second due to old age. He must have been in his upper 80's if not in his 90's.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 02-07-2006, 07:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Posts: 8,493
Points: 27,090, Level: 97
Points: 27,090, Level: 97 Points: 27,090, Level: 97 Points: 27,090, Level: 97
Level up: 74%, 260 Points needed
Level up: 74% Level up: 74% Level up: 74%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
Re: Third Party Election
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky
Lets face it, many of us are fustrated with the two party system. Its existence proves our fake democracy in our country. So let us say that we actually install true democracy in our country, reflecting many countries in Europe today, for what party would you vote for?

I'll list some of the major third parties.

For me I think its a split between the Socialist Party and Green Party. I liked a lot of what 2004 Libertarian Party Presidential Candidate Michael Badnarik had to say about the current issues with the current administration, but once I actually looked into the Libertarian Party's plans and views, I saw that they were planning on some pretty bad stuff, although much of it was good. The Green Party seemed the best to me during the 2004 Election, so I'll vote for them in this poll. I mostly associate myself with the Democratic Socialists, but the Socialist candidate during 2004 was just so rediculously weak. He wasted like 2 minutes of his speaking time during the third party Presidential debates searching through a pile of papers for notes. And he looked like he was going to roll over and die at any second due to old age. He must have been in his upper 80's if not in his 90's.
Split between green and socialist party for me too. Socialist just seems to equal communist in so many republicans minds that it wouldn't be worth it for me. Too frustrating to have to explain everything.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

"There is no such thing as laziness. Laziness is only lack of incentive." Norman Reider, MD

Morality is not contingent on religion to exist. Therefore religion only detracts from the purity of morality.
Old 02-07-2006, 07:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,519
Points: 12,633, Level: 73
Points: 12,633, Level: 73 Points: 12,633, Level: 73 Points: 12,633, Level: 73
Level up: 46%, 217 Points needed
Level up: 46% Level up: 46% Level up: 46%
Activity: 25%
Activity: 25% Activity: 25% Activity: 25%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Split between green and socialist party for me too. Socialist just seems to equal communist in so many republicans minds that it wouldn't be worth it for me. Too frustrating to have to explain everything.
Well I don't think its just Republicans, but rather its an American issue. Its a deep American tradition of insecurity and fear. Unusual to most countries, esspecially being the world's only superpower, America retains much of its insecurity despite being in one of the most secure nations in the world. You see it throughout all of American history, moving from scapegoat to scapegoat. First it was the "savage Indians." Which that particular connotation was used in even official US documents. Not to mention Andrew Jackson's official justifications for the conquest of Florida during the first Seminole War; which of coarse was because Jackson needed to 'protect American security' because the Floridian area was a quote "failed state." However we all know now that historically the conquest of Florida had absolutely nothing to do with security, because the only threats were "savage", or "lawless" Indians and runaway slaves. But rather it was a matter of expansion into capturing Spainish settlements.

This example runs parallel to the "War on Terror" and the "failed terrorist state of Iraq." Because not only did Jackson actually use the phrase "failed state" for Florida, but also went to war on 'justification' of Indian terror. Even though Indian attacks on white American settlements were in retaliation to attacks on Indian villages and the massacres that happened there. Plus the quote "lawless Indians" were actually Indians that were being driven out of their homes and murdered by white American settlers. Mostly because the Americans thought their way of life was better and their white skin reserved them their right to treat colored people like animals.

This insecurity followed right up into virtually all American history and retains much of its type in present day America. Soon enough white Americans were afraid of their own slaves. The scapegoat role mostly shifted to Chinese and Chinese immigrants. Then among others, it was the Germans in WWI, then the Japanese along with the Germans, then the Communists, and then finally Muslims. Of coarse I'm skiping over much, including Jews, which many people refuse the fact that there still retains much anti-semitism in America's elite culture. For example I was just in Kansas City about a month ago, and the richest part of the city called "Mission Hills" has a corresponding gulf coarse and country club that to this day still forbids Jews on their property and in their facilities. Tiger Woods has a hard enough time as it is, believe it or not.

By the time Communism got the role of 'evil enemy' in the United States, the extream anti-Communism grew in America and labeled anyone left of almost Laissez-faire capitalism were black listed as Communists and traitors. The fear mongering took form as Mccarthyism, and soon enough Socialism was grouped into Communism. Now today's society retains much of that fuzzy-line between Socialism and Communism. Even today you commonly see people refer Soviet-Communism to "Communism/Socialism" and just group both together. That is the equivelant of Communists saying "Capitalists/Socialists got it all wrong!"

What a lot of Americans don't know is that us Democratic Socialists dislike Soviet-Communism just as much or even more than Laissez-faire capitalism.

Now today, the complete fear of the Muslim and Arab community replaced Mccarthyism. Now many Middle-East born residents in America, and sometimes even Americans, or even Americans with Middle-East born familiy are being commonly and randomly arrested, and jailed to undefined lengths of time without right to due process or habeas corpus, and in some instances deported. Its surprising that many Americans aren't aware of these mass arrests of Muslim men and women across the country. Some Muslim-rich communities are facing a population loss of almost 50% due to arrests, but mostly due to families moving back to their home countries in fear of American officiers or federal officers storming their home and detaining them even without probable cause. Law-abiding citizens can be detained to indefinet lengths and habeas corpus suspended merely if the government stamps "enemy combatant" on their profile. Needing barely any probable cause besides just being born in the wrong place.

I kind of went off and described almost out of the realm of your post. And this will probably spark a debate, so if an admin or someone thinks my post should be in its own thread then move it if you like.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 02-07-2006, 10:44 PM   #4 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Posts: 8,493
Points: 27,090, Level: 97
Points: 27,090, Level: 97 Points: 27,090, Level: 97 Points: 27,090, Level: 97
Level up: 74%, 260 Points needed
Level up: 74% Level up: 74% Level up: 74%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Good post!
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

"There is no such thing as laziness. Laziness is only lack of incentive." Norman Reider, MD

Morality is not contingent on religion to exist. Therefore religion only detracts from the purity of morality.
Old 02-17-2006, 12:38 PM   #5 (permalink)
Citizen
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 186
Points: 3,045, Level: 33
Points: 3,045, Level: 33 Points: 3,045, Level: 33 Points: 3,045, Level: 33
Level up: 97%, 5 Points needed
Level up: 97% Level up: 97% Level up: 97%
Activity: 3%
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%
NoMoreDems-Reps is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Well I would vote for (almost) any party that could rival the REPS&DEMS.
But I still think that once Third parties have a viable chance of "FAIR"
competitions with the DEM-REP Monoply, that better parties will emerge.

Also I read about two parties that seemed perty good (on Paper) that
where not mentioned. I don't know if they are still around, but they are:

The Natural Law Party
The Taxpayers Party.


http://defendingthetruth.com/viewtop...003&highlight=
Old 02-19-2006, 09:59 PM   #6 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
intangible child's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California Dreamin
Posts: 2,997
Points: 18,812, Level: 86
Points: 18,812, Level: 86 Points: 18,812, Level: 86 Points: 18,812, Level: 86
Level up: 93%, 38 Points needed
Level up: 93% Level up: 93% Level up: 93%
Activity: 72%
Activity: 72% Activity: 72% Activity: 72%
intangible child is offline
Reply With Quote
 
http://www.gp.org/

It's time!

http://www.experiencefestival.com/community/index.php
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites