Defending the Truth
Earth
Click here for free registeration..
Quick Search
11/23/07 - Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!

Go Back   Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Elections and Candidates
Elections and Candidates Debate anything about current elections or candidates running for any position in office.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2005, 09:08 PM   #1 (permalink)
Website Owner
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,956
Thanks: 8
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts

Points: 35,177, Level: 100
Points: 35,177, Level: 100 Points: 35,177, Level: 100 Points: 35,177, Level: 100
Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 2% Level up: 2% Level up: 2%
Activity: 3%
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%

Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
The Filibuster

Democrats use the filibuster to prevent some of President Bush's best-qualified nominees to the federal courts. It takes 60 votes to defeat a filibuster, yet 51 votes to confirm the nominee.

I think this is unconstitutional. In my opinion, the Democrat's do not want to come upon an agreement with the Republicans in Congress...They want to be in full power.

The Republican's did not do this during Clinton's time...

What do you think about the filibuster?
__________________
Networked Web Sites
Jon-Kingsbury.com
DefendingTheTruth
UML Forums
RidinHighSpeeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2005, 09:20 PM   #2 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,493
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 26,333, Level: 96
Points: 26,333, Level: 96 Points: 26,333, Level: 96 Points: 26,333, Level: 96
Level up: 97%, 17 Points needed
Level up: 97% Level up: 97% Level up: 97%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Re: The Filibuster

Quote:
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds
Democrats use the filibuster to prevent some of President Bush's best-qualified nominees to the federal courts. It takes 60 votes to defeat a filibuster, yet 51 votes to confirm the nominee.

I think this is unconstitutional. In my opinion, the Democrat's do not want to come upon an agreement with the Republicans in Congress...They want to be in full power.

The Republican's did not do this during Clinton's time...

What do you think about the filibuster?
I saw on a tv debate that the reps did exactly that during the clinton era, but I don't have any links at the moment.
hevusa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2005, 09:23 PM   #3 (permalink)
Block Captain
 
duncanmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Green Bay Wisconsin
Posts: 271
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 3,124, Level: 34
Points: 3,124, Level: 34 Points: 3,124, Level: 34 Points: 3,124, Level: 34
Level up: 35%, 76 Points needed
Level up: 35% Level up: 35% Level up: 35%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Not true.This is the first time that a filibuster has been used to block a judicial nominee.The nominee deserves a yes or no vote,not leaving them hanging and twisting in the wind.
duncanmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2005, 09:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
Website Owner
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,956
Thanks: 8
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts

Points: 35,177, Level: 100
Points: 35,177, Level: 100 Points: 35,177, Level: 100 Points: 35,177, Level: 100
Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 2% Level up: 2% Level up: 2%
Activity: 3%
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%

Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
I did a quick search and didn't find anything...
__________________
Networked Web Sites
Jon-Kingsbury.com
DefendingTheTruth
UML Forums
RidinHighSpeeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2005, 09:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,493
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 26,333, Level: 96
Points: 26,333, Level: 96 Points: 26,333, Level: 96 Points: 26,333, Level: 96
Level up: 97%, 17 Points needed
Level up: 97% Level up: 97% Level up: 97%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by duncanmac
Not true.This is the first time that a filibuster has been used to block a judicial nominee.The nominee deserves a yes or no vote,not leaving them hanging and twisting in the wind.
Maybe it happened for some other position then...

fill me in. what is going on? Why don't they want him in?
hevusa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2005, 09:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Website Owner
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,956
Thanks: 8
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts

Points: 35,177, Level: 100
Points: 35,177, Level: 100 Points: 35,177, Level: 100 Points: 35,177, Level: 100
Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 2% Level up: 2% Level up: 2%
Activity: 3%
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%

Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
Do you think the filibuster should be abolished completely?

If whatever that needs to be passed has the majority vote, it will be passed?
__________________
Networked Web Sites
Jon-Kingsbury.com
DefendingTheTruth
UML Forums
RidinHighSpeeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2005, 09:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
Block Captain
 
duncanmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Green Bay Wisconsin
Posts: 271
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 3,124, Level: 34
Points: 3,124, Level: 34 Points: 3,124, Level: 34 Points: 3,124, Level: 34
Level up: 35%, 76 Points needed
Level up: 35% Level up: 35% Level up: 35%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by duncanmac
Not true.This is the first time that a filibuster has been used to block a judicial nominee.The nominee deserves a yes or no vote,not leaving them hanging and twisting in the wind.
Maybe it happened for some other position then...

fill me in. what is going on? Why don't they want him in?
I do not know all the specifics but it boils down to the basic opposition of views on certain subjects
duncanmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2005, 09:07 PM   #8 (permalink)
The Man You Love to Hate
 
sgtdmski's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ketchikan, AK
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,700
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Points: 6,478, Level: 52
Points: 6,478, Level: 52 Points: 6,478, Level: 52 Points: 6,478, Level: 52
Level up: 53%, 72 Points needed
Level up: 53% Level up: 53% Level up: 53%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Send a message via MSN to sgtdmski Send a message via Yahoo to sgtdmski
The Republicans during the Clinton era did not use the filibuster to prevent nominations, but instead did not vote them out of committee. All nominations that made it to the Senate Floor were given an up or down vote.


dmk
__________________
Conservatism, I repeat is not an ideology. It does not breed fanatics....But if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservative principles
-Russell Kirk-
sgtdmski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2005, 09:11 PM   #9 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,493
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 26,333, Level: 96
Points: 26,333, Level: 96 Points: 26,333, Level: 96 Points: 26,333, Level: 96
Level up: 97%, 17 Points needed
Level up: 97% Level up: 97% Level up: 97%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
The Republicans during the Clinton era did not use the filibuster to prevent nominations, but instead did not vote them out of committee. All nominations that made it to the Senate Floor were given an up or down vote.


dmk
It just doesn't seem like this is something new...

http://www.google.com/search?q=republican+filibuster

The question is why aren't there 3 or 4 more parties in the mix.
hevusa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2005, 11:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
Website Owner
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,956
Thanks: 8
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts

Points: 35,177, Level: 100
Points: 35,177, Level: 100 Points: 35,177, Level: 100 Points: 35,177, Level: 100
Level up: 2%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 2% Level up: 2% Level up: 2%
Activity: 3%
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%

Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
It just doesn't seem like this is something new...
The filibuster has been around for a long time. It's kinda tough defining the cause of a filibuster, but I believe its the first time it was used by a party (Democrats), to stop a nomination.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
The question is why aren't there 3 or 4 more parties in the mix.
Maybe it's time for change?
__________________
Networked Web Sites
Jon-Kingsbury.com
DefendingTheTruth
UML Forums
RidinHighSpeeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes






All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 PM.

DefendingTheTruth.com RSS2 Feed   Add to Google   Add to My Yahoo!   Add to My MSN
 

SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Created by: Jon-Kingsbury.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Proudly hosted by WireNine


Recommended Sites

Top Political Sites Poltical Topsites