| Elections and Candidates Debate anything about current elections or candidates running for any position in office. |
01-02-2008, 02:44 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Citizen
Country: Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Level up: 6%, 23 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky Perhaps, with the exception of poor, Dr. Ron Paul (although maybe he can be considered poor in comparison with the other Republican candidates). | Except that Ron Paul is an ultra-libertarian who opposes gov't spending except for the most basic necessities (e.g. military, policing, etc.). The FDR New Deal (which has provided our country economic stability since the depression) gone under Paul. Want safe drugs, safe foods, safe air to breath, insurance for your deposits, unemployment insurance, etc. then Paul's not your guy. Moreover, I restricted my analysis to candidates with a reasonable chance of success (of which Paul isn't one). |
| |
01-02-2008, 02:48 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Congressional Representative
Country: Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Columbus, OH
Gender:
Posts: 3,474
Thanks: 84
Thanked 206 Times in 112 Posts
Points: 12,146, Level: 72 | Level up: 73%, 304 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by vote_progressive Except that Ron Paul is an ultra-libertarian who opposes gov't spending except for the most basic necessities (e.g. military, policing, etc.). The FDR New Deal (which has provided our country economic stability since the depression) gone under Paul. Want safe drugs, safe foods, safe air to breath, insurance for your deposits, unemployment insurance, etc. then Paul's not your guy. Moreover, I restricted my analysis to candidates with a reasonable chance of success (of which Paul isn't one). | I fully agree, here. But as far as I know, Ron Paul is one of the few that don't seem to be just 'playing politics'. It seems, especially considering his voting record, he actually means what he says. Thus the mention.
Though, I think Ron Paul has a better chance at the general election then you make it out to be. Though I would agree that he has no chance in winning the Republican nomination.
__________________ Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72 |
| |
01-02-2008, 08:18 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Citizen
Country: Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 58
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Level up: 14%, 7 Points needed | | The nightmare scenario for this country would be if Dennis Kucinich was elected president in 2009. He would have Sean Penn for Vice Pres. Al Gore for Sec Of State, and Rosie O' Donnell as the Attorney General. There would be no need for a Sec Of Defense because Kucinich has admitted in several televised debates that his is a peacemonger and a giant pussy. Thank god the elf man will never have a snowball's chance in hell. |
| |
01-02-2008, 09:29 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Citizen
Country: Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Level up: 6%, 23 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Man Of Tomorrow The nightmare scenario for this country would be if Dennis Kucinich was elected president in 2009. He would have Sean Penn for Vice Pres. Al Gore for Sec Of State, and Rosie O' Donnell as the Attorney General. There would be no need for a Sec Of Defense because Kucinich has admitted in several televised debates that his is a peacemonger and a giant pussy. Thank god the elf man will never have a snowball's chance in hell. | You say that like it would be any better than who we have now? Okay, Rosie O'Donnell would be a little scary.... eeek |
| |
01-02-2008, 09:33 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Citizen
Country: Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Level up: 6%, 23 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky I fully agree, here. But as far as I know, Ron Paul is one of the few that don't seem to be just 'playing politics'. It seems, especially considering his voting record, he actually means what he says. Thus the mention.
Though, I think Ron Paul has a better chance at the general election then you make it out to be. Though I would agree that he has no chance in winning the Republican nomination. | Can't argue with that -- Paul is definitely speaking from the heart. Don't get me wrong, there are many, many libertarian ideas (that Paul has) that I agree with ... but other areas I strongly disagree with. That being said -- as Paul himself notes, a single Presidency (or even two terms) wouldn't be enough to accomplish all of what he envisions (plus it's fun to watch Paul speak). |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |