Defending the Truth

Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Elections and Candidates

Elections and Candidates Debate anything about current elections or candidates running for any position in office.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-15-2008, 05:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,654
Country:
Points: 13,944, Level: 76
Points: 13,944, Level: 76 Points: 13,944, Level: 76 Points: 13,944, Level: 76
Level up: 74%, 106 Points needed
Level up: 74% Level up: 74% Level up: 74%
Activity: 20%
Activity: 20% Activity: 20% Activity: 20%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
Hillary all-out negative.
After straight losses in the February elections, Hillary Clinton is feeling the heat. And now she's turned the burner on her opponent, switching back to negative mode. Among other things she's released just all-out negative ads on Obama (NYTimes).

Perhaps Mike Huckabee's lemon analogy is becoming more relevant as the finish line approaches and people are taking cheap shots. What do you get when you squeeze a lemon? What ever's inside.

It's clear that Clinton is being squeezed, and what's coming out smells like typical reactionism and status quo to me.

To bad the race can't be Obama vs. Huckabee only if to have a relatively positive election year.

Looks like more Daisy Girls, time-bomb clicking noises to images of terrorists, and just overall "my opponent kills kittens and eats babies for breakfast" ads come the general election.
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72

Last edited by Katczinsky; 02-15-2008 at 05:37 PM.
Sponsored Links
Old 02-15-2008, 07:31 PM   #2 (permalink)
Council Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,245
Points: 5,523, Level: 47
Points: 5,523, Level: 47 Points: 5,523, Level: 47 Points: 5,523, Level: 47
Level up: 87%, 27 Points needed
Level up: 87% Level up: 87% Level up: 87%
Activity: 2%
Activity: 2% Activity: 2% Activity: 2%
nuttyjoe is offline
Reply With Quote
 
It's an unconcious admission that her ship is fast sinking; Katz.
Old 02-15-2008, 08:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,654
Country:
Points: 13,944, Level: 76
Points: 13,944, Level: 76 Points: 13,944, Level: 76 Points: 13,944, Level: 76
Level up: 74%, 106 Points needed
Level up: 74% Level up: 74% Level up: 74%
Activity: 20%
Activity: 20% Activity: 20% Activity: 20%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Her ship of inevitability, perhaps. But she definitely still has the upper hand so long as she continues to poll well in Ohio, Texas, and Pennsylvania.
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 02-15-2008, 08:42 PM   #4 (permalink)
Council Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,245
Points: 5,523, Level: 47
Points: 5,523, Level: 47 Points: 5,523, Level: 47 Points: 5,523, Level: 47
Level up: 87%, 27 Points needed
Level up: 87% Level up: 87% Level up: 87%
Activity: 2%
Activity: 2% Activity: 2% Activity: 2%
nuttyjoe is offline
Reply With Quote
 
There is a real reason why she has lost more and more of the Women's support, the Latino support, and the elderly support as evidenced in the last few primary sweeps by Obama.
Her money situation does not look promising either. Her campaign is in disarray when a campaign manager quits or is replaced at such a critical time as this. She has switched from "This is why you should vote for me" messages in her ads to "This is why you shouldn't vote for him" messages.
The polls do show her slightly ahead in the states with upcoming primaries. I believe that if she is swept again; it's all over for her.
I agree with FX; it's Obama's race to win or lose at this point. But he cannot lose. The support being shown Obama guarantees that he must be part of whatever ticket the Dems put forth in November. If he isn't; the GOP will own the White House for the next 16 years.
Old 02-18-2008, 12:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
Citizen
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 72
Points: 1,386, Level: 20
Points: 1,386, Level: 20 Points: 1,386, Level: 20 Points: 1,386, Level: 20
Level up: 86%, 14 Points needed
Level up: 86% Level up: 86% Level up: 86%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
fmdog44 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
If anyone can pull this out she can and that thought is depressing. This morning on MSNBC (02-18-0 they showed clips of Bill Clinton jumping in the face of an Obama supporter. He got really ugly with the guy and came close to touching his face. Bill is doing more to trash his wife than she is. I truely believe he wants her in more than she does.
Old 02-18-2008, 12:59 PM   #6 (permalink)
Council Member
 
waitingtables's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Jersey
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,882
Country:
Points: 13,024, Level: 74
Points: 13,024, Level: 74 Points: 13,024, Level: 74 Points: 13,024, Level: 74
Level up: 44%, 226 Points needed
Level up: 44% Level up: 44% Level up: 44%
Activity: 30%
Activity: 30% Activity: 30% Activity: 30%
waitingtables is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Don't get me wrong, I like Bill, but he should chill and fade into the background. He's not helping her.
Old 02-18-2008, 02:17 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,654
Country:
Points: 13,944, Level: 76
Points: 13,944, Level: 76 Points: 13,944, Level: 76 Points: 13,944, Level: 76
Level up: 74%, 106 Points needed
Level up: 74% Level up: 74% Level up: 74%
Activity: 20%
Activity: 20% Activity: 20% Activity: 20%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
It may appear so that Bill is doing more harm than good, but seriously, would we be hearing about Hillary Clinton now if it weren't for her being the wife of Bill Clinton? Or George Bush being the son of George H. W. Bush? Or the Kennedy's??

Not to mention the Republicans are throwing a fit because there isn't a successor to the Reagan throne; as really the only political offspring of his went to the 'dark side' of liberalism (Ron Reagan).

For a country that likes to think of itself democratic we sure do like our dynasties.
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72

Last edited by Katczinsky; 02-18-2008 at 02:34 PM.
Old 02-18-2008, 02:29 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,654
Country:
Points: 13,944, Level: 76
Points: 13,944, Level: 76 Points: 13,944, Level: 76 Points: 13,944, Level: 76
Level up: 74%, 106 Points needed
Level up: 74% Level up: 74% Level up: 74%
Activity: 20%
Activity: 20% Activity: 20% Activity: 20%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuttyjoe View Post
There is a real reason why she has lost more and more of the Women's support, the Latino support, and the elderly support as evidenced in the last few primary sweeps by Obama.
Her money situation does not look promising either. Her campaign is in disarray when a campaign manager quits or is replaced at such a critical time as this. She has switched from "This is why you should vote for me" messages in her ads to "This is why you shouldn't vote for him" messages.
The polls do show her slightly ahead in the states with upcoming primaries. I believe that if she is swept again; it's all over for her.
I agree with FX; it's Obama's race to win or lose at this point. But he cannot lose. The support being shown Obama guarantees that he must be part of whatever ticket the Dems put forth in November. If he isn't; the GOP will own the White House for the next 16 years.
Even if Obama sweeps from now until the convention, he still won't have the needed number of delegates to officially have the nomination. He has to win like in the 60's with Clinton in the 30's in most of the major states (including Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania) to even have enough delegates. The former scenario is rare enough, and the latter we can probably agree upon to be impossible.

I seriously think when it comes down to it, this thing will either be decided by the superdelegates or by the re-inclusion of Florida's and Michigan's delegates. Either way it sounds like bad news for Obama. The real question is if he can gain enough pledged delegates to present a good enough argument at the convention for superdelegates to decide not to overturn the democratic decision of the people.

As for Obama being a part of the ticket no matter what, I think it's highly highly unlikely that Clinton would decide to put Obama on the ticket. It's much more likely that we'll see a Clinton-Edwards or Obama-Edwards ticket.
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72

Last edited by Katczinsky; 02-18-2008 at 02:35 PM.
Old 02-18-2008, 02:47 PM   #9 (permalink)
Council Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,245
Points: 5,523, Level: 47
Points: 5,523, Level: 47 Points: 5,523, Level: 47 Points: 5,523, Level: 47
Level up: 87%, 27 Points needed
Level up: 87% Level up: 87% Level up: 87%
Activity: 2%
Activity: 2% Activity: 2% Activity: 2%
nuttyjoe is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky View Post
Even if Obama sweeps from now until the convention, he probably still won't have the needed number of delegates to officially have the nomination. He has to win like in the 60's with Clinton in the 30's in most of the major states (including Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania) to even have enough delegates. The former scenario is rare enough, and the latter we can probably agree upon to be impossible.

I seriously think when it comes down to it, this thing will either be decided by the superdelegates or by the re-inclusion of Florida's and Michigan's delegates. Either way it sounds like bad news for Obama. The real question is if he can gain enough pledged delegates to present a good enough argument at the convention for superdelegates to decide not to overturn the democratic decision of the people.

As for Obama being a part of the ticket no matter what, I think it's highly highly unlikely that Clinton would decide to put Obama on the ticket. It's much more likely that we'll see a Clinton-Edwards or Obama-Edwards ticket.
I disagree with you that it is unlikely for Hillary to include Obama as part of the ticket should she win. First, because with all the turmoil in her campaign; I don't think she can win. Second, Nobody has yet to explain the continued and expanding support Obama is receiving.
It is not just coming from the African-American vote. Obama is not running a campaign on the "vote for me because I'm Black" platform. People are disillusioned with the recent past in politics, and are nor clamoring for a change. Hillary is being veiwed as a part of that past; where nothing will change.
The funny thing is; I don't foresee either of them actually getting enough delegates on their own. But I foresee many of Hillary's delegates jumping ship to support Obama coming soon if she cannot turn her campaign around and get back on track. So far, Obama is what the people want to see on the Dem ticket-one way or another.

Last edited by nuttyjoe; 02-19-2008 at 10:52 PM.
Old 02-18-2008, 11:16 PM   #10 (permalink)
Block Captain
 
paradoxymoron's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 241
Country:
Points: 2,764, Level: 32
Points: 2,764, Level: 32 Points: 2,764, Level: 32 Points: 2,764, Level: 32
Level up: 10%, 136 Points needed
Level up: 10% Level up: 10% Level up: 10%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
paradoxymoron is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Obama may kill kittens but at least he doesn't huff them
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites