I did respond to his post. There are 2 posts from me right above you.

Leave them out? What? What in the Christ are you talking about?

You really amaze me sometimes.

I would respond to this post, I really would, and I'm being sincere. I just really have no idea what made you think this after you read my post.

If you call your intangible child post a response then sure, otherwise the other post above that quotes an entirely different post, one of mine actually.

Derrrrrrrrrrrr what?

That wasn't the part in contention alias...


Show me ANY news source which references the 9/11 widows WITHOUT discussing Ann Coulter's commentary on them...

Wait a tick. I'm asking you to prove something.
Of COURSE you'll refuse...



You ignored the vast majority of what I said.
As usual...

There is a difference inbetween responding to a post and responding to an ARGUMENT...
Habitually, you ignore the arguments so you can repeat your already countered arguments at a later date...

Sarge agreed with what Coulter said about the 09/11 widows and Cindy Sheehan. Why don't you ask him to use smaller words next time so you can understand him better when he gives his opinion.

I may have to use smaller words next time to get your dumb ass to understand.

(Was "understand" too many syllables?)

I have no argument that Sarge agreed with Coulter's stance on those two issues.

The point is that Sarge was put Coulter UP ALONGSIDE MICHAEL MOORE.

THAT is the point you keep ignoring.

And the point you keep ignoring is that he never said anything favorable about Michael Moore. Here:

Sarge: "Perhaps the problem is the simple fact that ours actually looks better and at times is much more believable. Michael Moore the poor boy from Detroit, oh that's right, he is actually from an upper class all white neighborhood in the suburbs and not actually Detroit".

OURS looks better and at times is MUCH MORE BELIEVABLE.

Nighty night.

1) "looks better"?
My gawd! They WRITE for a living, and you're leading with Ann Coulter "looks better"???
Man. Why don't you just give up instead of insisting more dirt be shovelled on top of you...

2) YOU find her "more believable", but you cannot even bring yourself to answer a few simple questions about her claims or defend her statements when Dylan proves them as lies...

I never said I find her "more believable", Sarge did. Take it up with him. Fileted and gutted.

I'm willing to admit that in the sum of Ann Coulter's work there are a few morsels of truth, but the same can be said about Michael Moore.

I don't like either of them but I'm willing to admit that. Obviously Sarge didn't say anything positive about Moore because it probably makes a conservative queasy to even attempt that. You can still muster up the honesty to admit that for the few morsels Coulter has to her name, Moore more or less has the same number of morsels to his name. I don't know why you can not see that. Actually I do, it's because you defend conservatives to the death without even thinking about what they are saying and simply write off anything that comes out of a liberal's mouth as blasphemy.