Defending the Truth

I also remember the Democrats complaining about the long lines in areas that were mostly liberal. Well...guess thats what happens when you have Democrat's running local voting areas.

Slashing of the tires...Why isn't this mentioned? There's illegal activity that the left is perfectly allowed to do, yet everything else must be the Republicans fault for Kerry losing the elections.

That whole Kennedy article of chock full of BS and partisan speculation.

It's kinda like Hevusa INSISTING that the WTC Towers were imploded. The beauty of the accusation is that nobody can really prove it false.

That is because it isn't false. Truth usually prevails.

1. With that kind of reasoning, nothing can ever be proven because if it could be proven it already would. But you are arguing with his conclusion, not his warrant. This is not a debate about the merit of his claims, it is a battle of your speculation. There is no reason to believe that it could be true but not proven yet. There are lots of things that are true that have not been proven yet.

2. That is why it was odd that of the military personnel that were caged were democrats.

3. Again, you are simply asserting that something cannot fall through the cracks. Your claim here is equal to saying "That woman was not raped because if she was there would have been an immediate arrest." Guess what. Crimes happen and people get away with it. Especially when people make up their mind without looking at the arguments.

Overall you are still refusing to give any reason why these irregularities happened. Keep that head in the sand, and all the problems will go away.

That's total BS.

I am NOT refusing to give answers. I pointed out a few (of the many) EARLY idiotic statements Kennedy made. I could go on.


Now answer me this... The two people that wrote articles claiming that Democrat's registrations were destroyed WROTE THOSE ARTICLES IN SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER BEFORE THE ELECTION!!!!!!!!!!!! How can they be relevant to the election?

The answer? THEY'RE NOT. THE ARTICLES ARE WRONG. THE ASSUMPTIONS KENNEDY DREW FROM THEM ARE WRONG.

Of course they would shred registration cards before the election. Why would they shred them after the election? If Republicans wanted to eliminate democratic voters they would do so when they registered which is before the election.

My bank shreds all my checks within a month of the time they're written.

THEY'RE HIDING SOMETHING!
THEY'RE TRYING TO STEAL FROM ME!
THEY'RE DOIN' ME WRONG!


Or maybe - just maybe - it's "policy".
You don't need paper registrations after the information has been added into the computer, and there's a back-up file. Hello...

The argument is they were caught shredding the registration forms before adding the information to the computer.

Robert Kennedy is a person who grew up wealthy with priviledge, entered politics which is mandatory for a Kennedy male, and has been treading water. He needs an issue. He's trying to make one. If Kerry would have won the presidency, do you really think he would make this an issue?????

Naive people. Very naive.

Robert Kennedy should be selling cars or flipping burgers.

Why does he sound like he is ready to start sobbing any moment? He sounds like a wimp and looks and acts like one.

The same could be said about the Bush family and the war on terrorism or the gay marriage amendment. I am beginning to wonder if you guys simply can't come up with a reasonable defense so you attack Kennedy. I take great joy in it though, each personal attack you guys make is further reason to believe he is simply right. If he is wrong, give me evidence that discredits his claim, it should be easy since this is not a real issue.