Defending the Truth

  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Elections and Candidates
The Verdict is in: 2006 Election is about Iraq

Elections and Candidates Debate anything about current elections or candidates running for any position in office.

Reply
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-09-2006, 07:03 PM   #21 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
intangible child's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California Dreamin
Posts: 3,065
Points: 19,109, Level: 87
Points: 19,109, Level: 87 Points: 19,109, Level: 87 Points: 19,109, Level: 87
Level up: 52%, 241 Points needed
Level up: 52% Level up: 52% Level up: 52%
Activity: 88%
Activity: 88% Activity: 88% Activity: 88%
intangible child is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
The baseline mantra of the RNC is this:

Anti -Abortion we need fodder for wars of aggression & lies
Anti -Taxation we will drive the United states to financial destruction
Anti -Welfare we love to see people suffer
Pro -War we love to make oil companies rich
Pro -Capital Punishment we love murder
Pro -Business we love outsourcing jobs to other countries fuck Amerika
Live the Light, Give the Light,
Bring Heaven to Earth Every Day!


http://youtube.com/watch?v=jBcwAJZGX...=john%20denver


The ancient Greeks used to say, "You shall know a man by the friends that he keeps." Given the nature of their friends and advisers, what are we to conclude about the Republican party:
Stop the madness before us it stops!
Σταματήστε την τρέλα προτού να μας σταματήσεϊ Greek
Sponsored Links
Old 08-09-2006, 07:35 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,530
Points: 12,759, Level: 73
Points: 12,759, Level: 73 Points: 12,759, Level: 73 Points: 12,759, Level: 73
Level up: 78%, 91 Points needed
Level up: 78% Level up: 78% Level up: 78%
Activity: 22%
Activity: 22% Activity: 22% Activity: 22%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Since when did being for a war against terrorists started by terrrorists become a litmus test for Democrats?
The Iraq War wasn't started by terrorists. Unless of coarse, you consider this administration to be terrorists. Get your facts straight.
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 08-09-2006, 08:02 PM   #23 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Posts: 7,665
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky View Post
The Iraq War wasn't started by terrorists. Unless of coarse, you consider this administration to be terrorists. Get your facts straight.
It most certainly was started by a terrorist. Saddam Hussein was a terrrorist. He started this crap back in 1991. There was a cease fire, no surrender. He never stopped violating that cease fire until the invasion. Get your facts straight. You're almost as fucking dumb as that asshole Hevusa.
Old 08-10-2006, 10:26 AM   #24 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,363
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by intangible child View Post
The baseline mantra of the RNC is this:

Anti -Abortion we need fodder for wars of aggression & lies
Anti -Taxation we will drive the United states to financial destruction
Anti -Welfare we love to see people suffer
Pro -War we love to make oil companies rich
Pro -Capital Punishment we love murder
Pro -Business we love outsourcing jobs to other countries fuck Amerika

Can you not come up with something original? Just once?
Old 08-13-2006, 10:41 AM   #25 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
chrisg967's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Posts: 834
Points: 3,877, Level: 39
Points: 3,877, Level: 39 Points: 3,877, Level: 39 Points: 3,877, Level: 39
Level up: 52%, 73 Points needed
Level up: 52% Level up: 52% Level up: 52%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
chrisg967 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias View Post
It most certainly was started by a terrorist. Saddam Hussein was a terrrorist. He started this crap back in 1991. There was a cease fire, no surrender. He never stopped violating that cease fire until the invasion. Get your facts straight. (snip)
If the Iraq war is a continuation of the 1991 war, why didn't Bush present it as such?
Old 08-13-2006, 11:39 AM   #26 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Posts: 7,665
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisg967 View Post
If the Iraq war is a continuation of the 1991 war, why didn't Bush present it as such?
Why would he have to? What I mean is there was never a surrender. Cease fire does not mean the war is over. It only means we're gonna stop fighting but the issue is not settled. When one nation wins and one loses, then it is settled. It was settled right after the invasion when we established a new government until the elections.
Old 08-13-2006, 11:47 AM   #27 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
chrisg967's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Posts: 834
Points: 3,877, Level: 39
Points: 3,877, Level: 39 Points: 3,877, Level: 39 Points: 3,877, Level: 39
Level up: 52%, 73 Points needed
Level up: 52% Level up: 52% Level up: 52%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
chrisg967 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias View Post
Why would he have to? What I mean is there was never a surrender. Cease fire does not mean the war is over. It only means we're gonna stop fighting but the issue is not settled. When one nation wins and one loses, then it is settled. It was settled right after the invasion when we established a new government until the elections.
Not have to, want to. To be totally honest about why we're going in. I mean, he called it a pre-emptive strike, not a continuation of the 1990 Gulf War. Didn't he?
Old 08-14-2006, 12:55 AM   #28 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,530
Points: 12,759, Level: 73
Points: 12,759, Level: 73 Points: 12,759, Level: 73 Points: 12,759, Level: 73
Level up: 78%, 91 Points needed
Level up: 78% Level up: 78% Level up: 78%
Activity: 22%
Activity: 22% Activity: 22% Activity: 22%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias View Post
It most certainly was started by a terrorist. Saddam Hussein was a terrrorist. He started this crap back in 1991. There was a cease fire, no surrender. He never stopped violating that cease fire until the invasion. Get your facts straight. You're almost as fucking dumb as that asshole Hevusa.
Oh, so a terrorist is just someone that opposes the US (translation: United States domination as the sole super power)?
Political Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 08-20-2006, 09:58 AM   #29 (permalink)
Website Owner
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 6,972
Thanks: 9
Thanked 59 Times in 52 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
RidinHighSpeeds is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson View Post
Kinda like the fact that Ross Perot is the main reason Bill Clinton ever became President.
I love using this everytime a Clinton supporter complains about how Bush got elected.
Networked Web Sites
Jon-Kingsbury.com
DefendingTheTruth
UML Forums
Old 08-24-2006, 08:01 AM   #30 (permalink)
Beer Man
 
onthefence's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: stuck in the middle
Posts: 4,640
Thanks: 33
Thanked 120 Times in 86 Posts
onthefence is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa View Post
Leiberman is going to win as an independant??
Not a chance.

Don't be so sure about that...

Quote:
Among likely voters, Lieberman was supported by 53 percent, compared to Lamont's 41 percent and Schlesinger's 4 percent.


http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/...nn_allpolitics
"We could not now take time for further search or consideration, our victuals being much spent, especially our beer." - William Bradford



Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right.....

Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!
Reply
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.

Contact Us - Defending the Truth - Archive - Top

 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites 

Recommended Sites