Defending the Truth

  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Elections and Candidates

Elections and Candidates Debate anything about current elections or candidates running for any position in office.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2006, 09:51 AM   #1 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
tyreay's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 2,909
Points: 15,011, Level: 79
Points: 15,011, Level: 79 Points: 15,011, Level: 79 Points: 15,011, Level: 79
Level up: 33%, 339 Points needed
Level up: 33% Level up: 33% Level up: 33%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to tyreay
tyreay is offline
Reply With Quote
Mudslinging campaigns
Has anyone else noticed that both major parties are running on mudslinging campaigns? I find this to be a total turn-off.
I realize that history shows that this is the norm. Let face it, the campaigns of the past make this one seem tame. I mean, Lincoln's opponent called him an ape. Andrew Jackson's opponent claim he was illegitimate.
Does anyone else feel like we should be past all this? Running on the actual merits of the given candidate is really how it should be done. I think our whole voting process need a change. Sadly, the two major parties have a monopoly on the national government seats. They are also in a position to stop such things as run-off voting. I am an independent for just this reason, yet I will vote Democrat to return some balance to government.
How does everyone else feel about this?
Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour

There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. ~Alexis de Tocqueville
Old 10-28-2006, 10:06 AM   #2 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
chrisg967's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Posts: 834
Points: 3,873, Level: 39
Points: 3,873, Level: 39 Points: 3,873, Level: 39 Points: 3,873, Level: 39
Level up: 49%, 77 Points needed
Level up: 49% Level up: 49% Level up: 49%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
chrisg967 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
I agree. I was taught if you can't say anything nice about someone, not to say anything.

Instant run-off voting sounds like a reasonable process to me. There are some legislators who are for it, including John McCain, Howard Dean and Barack Obama (source: FairVote - Home..) North Carolina recently passed legislation for IRV, and there are IRV proposals on a few ballots. So it is gaining interest around the country.

Hmm.. perhaps if each one of us wrote letters to candidates stating our disgust at negative campaigns, calling them on their actions and holding them responsible, we would see less and less of this.

Last edited by chrisg967; 10-28-2006 at 01:36 PM.
Old 10-28-2006, 01:30 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,363
Points: 21,916, Level: 92
Points: 21,916, Level: 92 Points: 21,916, Level: 92 Points: 21,916, Level: 92
Level up: 57%, 434 Points needed
Level up: 57% Level up: 57% Level up: 57%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
There's a LOT at stake, so the political parties are both pulling off the gloves!
Old 10-29-2006, 04:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
The Man You Love to Hate
 
sgtdmski's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ketchikan, AK
Posts: 1,700
Points: 6,537, Level: 52
Points: 6,537, Level: 52 Points: 6,537, Level: 52 Points: 6,537, Level: 52
Level up: 94%, 13 Points needed
Level up: 94% Level up: 94% Level up: 94%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via MSN to sgtdmski Send a message via Yahoo to sgtdmski
sgtdmski is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Unfortunately any political analyst will tell you that negative ads work. It is part of the process. Think about it, from a time a person is elected, until the next election they are raising money. If your want true election reform, make campaign ads free. Then members will not have to raise money in such vast quantities.

dmk
Conservatism, I repeat is not an ideology. It does not breed fanatics....But if you want men who seek, reasonably and prudently, to reconcile the best in wisdom of our ancestors with the change which is essential to a vigorous civil social existence, then you will do well to turn to conservative principles
-Russell Kirk-
Old 10-29-2006, 06:41 AM   #5 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
chrisg967's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Posts: 834
Points: 3,873, Level: 39
Points: 3,873, Level: 39 Points: 3,873, Level: 39 Points: 3,873, Level: 39
Level up: 49%, 77 Points needed
Level up: 49% Level up: 49% Level up: 49%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
chrisg967 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
It is the people who allow negative ads to work.

You have a good point about money. How do we make campaign ads free?

Another thought I had is that if the candidates are slinging mud before elections, how can they be thought of as "honorable" once elected?
Old 10-29-2006, 07:13 AM   #6 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
tyreay's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: RI
Posts: 2,909
Points: 15,011, Level: 79
Points: 15,011, Level: 79 Points: 15,011, Level: 79 Points: 15,011, Level: 79
Level up: 33%, 339 Points needed
Level up: 33% Level up: 33% Level up: 33%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to tyreay
tyreay is offline
Reply With Quote
 
You all have great points. As for the money thing, Who would pay for this? Unless we got the networks to donate the ads it would be a cost our economy shouldn't have to bear.
Politics, it seems to me, for years, or all too long, has been concerned with right or left instead of right or wrong. ~Richard Armour

There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle. ~Alexis de Tocqueville
Old 12-03-2006, 04:35 PM   #7 (permalink)
Council Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,219
Points: 5,100, Level: 45
Points: 5,100, Level: 45 Points: 5,100, Level: 45 Points: 5,100, Level: 45
Level up: 75%, 50 Points needed
Level up: 75% Level up: 75% Level up: 75%
Activity: 10%
Activity: 10% Activity: 10% Activity: 10%
nuttyjoe is offline
Reply With Quote
 
We disagree on many topics, Tyreay; but we definitely are on the same page here! In the last election in my congressional district, a candidate named Tammy Duckworth was running against the incumbent Peter Roskam. While I respect Ms. Duckworth's service in the National Guard as a helicopter pilot; one of her ads stated that Mr. Roskam supported the NRA by thier stand that the principal of a school could not expel a child whom had brought a gun to school.
When has the NRA ever advocated children bring guns to school? As far as the suspension goes; it is up to the school boards to vote on expelling a child (for whatever reason). I lost all thought of voting for Ms. Duckworth at that point. I am now an independent who will concentrate on issues rather than mudslinging.
Old 12-03-2006, 07:12 PM   #8 (permalink)
Beer Man
 
onthefence's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: stuck in the middle
Posts: 4,608
Thanks: 28
Thanked 109 Times in 76 Posts
onthefence is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisg967 View Post
It is the people who allow negative ads to work.

You have a good point about money. How do we make campaign ads free?

Another thought I had is that if the candidates are slinging mud before elections, how can they be thought of as "honorable" once elected?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyreay View Post
You all have great points. As for the money thing, Who would pay for this? Unless we got the networks to donate the ads it would be a cost our economy shouldn't have to bear.

We should do away with ads all together and have more debates with all the candidates included. The Gov. race in MA Republican Kerry Healy kept trying to exclude the third party candidates from the debates. Had she put more effort into winning the debate instead of whining about only wanting to debate with the Democrat........
"We could not now take time for further search or consideration, our victuals being much spent, especially our beer." - William Bradford



Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right.....

Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!
Old 12-03-2006, 07:18 PM   #9 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,363
Points: 21,916, Level: 92
Points: 21,916, Level: 92 Points: 21,916, Level: 92 Points: 21,916, Level: 92
Level up: 57%, 434 Points needed
Level up: 57% Level up: 57% Level up: 57%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthefence View Post
We should do away with ads all together and have more debates with all the candidates included. The Gov. race in MA Republican Kerry Healy kept trying to exclude the third party candidates from the debates. Had she put more effort into winning the debate instead of whining about only wanting to debate with the Democrat........
I couldn't agree more.

If they want to pay for "air time", let the candidates pay for "airing" their debates.
Old 12-04-2006, 03:50 PM   #10 (permalink)
Website Owner
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Posts: 6,962
Thanks: 9
Thanked 46 Times in 41 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
RidinHighSpeeds is offline
Reply With Quote
 
I like all these proposed ideas...

Debate is definitely more effective than a 30 second ad on t.v.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites