Defending the Truth

Steven M · 09-14-2005, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hevusa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steven M

Quote:

Originally Posted by aMFliberal

Quote:

Originally Posted by bullwinkle

The Clinton's are well known for ignoring laws and running things the way they want to. But this Hillary telling Bush how things are, and complaining about 'I'd never have hired such a man' is just getting to be WAY too much.

In the first place, she has no say in the matter, and to be frank, her opinion doesn't matter. can you imagine anyone buying into her spiel? Even the Dem's I've spoken to admit how fake it is. Well the ones who weren't ashamed admitted it. I'm quite sure that anyone with above a toddler's understanding of body language and sincerity would know this is ridiculous.

Someone really needs to tell Hillary to shut up and sit down. this is the same inappropriate, out of place rambling she did when she caused the Iraqi government to get upset. She needs to be put in check, and blasted for this.

Ironically all you hear from her is the republican attack machine. Rather familiar now isn't it?

Anyone who doesn't think she was vying for a presidential bid need only understand her whining about FEMA. She wouldn't have hired anyone like that? She' s never, and will never have the chance. that's a job the president does. not some bitter old woman that can't keep her mouth shut.

Brown resigned...just stirring the pot.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/09/12/kat...act/index.html

Good for him.

No, good for us!

Absolutely. It was the best thing (perhaps the only good thing) that Brown has done throughout the whole tragedy.

bullwinkle · 09-14-2005, 04:11 PM

"In New York, Hillary Clinton is widely seen as an Arkansas carpetbagger, and is hated for it. In Arkansas, however, she is seen as a New Yorker, and is hated for that just as keenly." New York tourist shops report that two of their top-sellers are Hillary voodoo dolls (which carry the invitation to "stick it to her"), and the Hillary Clinton doormat.

sgtdmski · 09-14-2005, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hevusa

After unjust elections and the unjust war I think the issues you mentioned above are small potatoes in the mind of voters, both republican and democrat.

Unjust election??? How?? Define it??? Just because Bush won the election in 2000 and again in 2004, they were not unjust. Time and time again, the 2000 election has been rehashed, three different independent sources, The New Your Times and the Dade-Miami Herald being two, recounted the ballots, and in all recounts, George W Bush was the leading vote getter in Florida. You talk of a conspiracy about the changing of the state of Florida to Bush in the early hours of the morning by first Fox news and then the other affliates. What about the calling of Florida for Gore, by ABC news and then all other affliates before the closing of all the polls in the state. Talking about unjust. Or what about in St Louis, where democrats got a restraining order that prevented the polls from closing at 7 PM to allow everyone who had not voted to come and vote. The rest of Missouri's polls closed at 7 PM, those in line at that time were allowed to vote, but no others were allowed to join the line. But St Louis allowed people to continue voting until almost midnight. UNJUST??? Yeah right.

As far as the "unjust war" please explain to me why this war is unjust.
And then I will address this issue.

dmk

hevusa · 09-15-2005, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sgtdmski

Quote:

Originally Posted by hevusa

After unjust elections and the unjust war I think the issues you mentioned above are small potatoes in the mind of voters, both republican and democrat.

Unjust election??? How?? Define it??? Just because Bush won the election in 2000 and again in 2004, they were not unjust. Time and time again, the 2000 election has been rehashed, three different independent sources, The New Your Times and the Dade-Miami Herald being two, recounted the ballots, and in all recounts, George W Bush was the leading vote getter in Florida. You talk of a conspiracy about the changing of the state of Florida to Bush in the early hours of the morning by first Fox news and then the other affliates. What about the calling of Florida for Gore, by ABC news and then all other affliates before the closing of all the polls in the state. Talking about unjust. Or what about in St Louis, where democrats got a restraining order that prevented the polls from closing at 7 PM to allow everyone who had not voted to come and vote. The rest of Missouri's polls closed at 7 PM, those in line at that time were allowed to vote, but no others were allowed to join the line. But St Louis allowed people to continue voting until almost midnight. UNJUST??? Yeah right.

As far as the "unjust war" please explain to me why this war is unjust.
And then I will address this issue.

dmk

Yes unjust. People's votes being blocked because of race by your own campaign. VERY VERY VERY UNJUST.

Calling out the military record of someone who served in the war when you avoided the very same war... YES, VERY VERY UNJUST.

Keep saying "yeah right" though. I think it is pretty cute that someone could be that stuck in their ideology to escape reality.

tadpole256 · 09-15-2005, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hevusa

Quote:

Originally Posted by sgtdmski

Quote:

Originally Posted by hevusa

After unjust elections and the unjust war I think the issues you mentioned above are small potatoes in the mind of voters, both republican and democrat.

Unjust election??? How?? Define it??? Just because Bush won the election in 2000 and again in 2004, they were not unjust. Time and time again, the 2000 election has been rehashed, three different independent sources, The New Your Times and the Dade-Miami Herald being two, recounted the ballots, and in all recounts, George W Bush was the leading vote getter in Florida. You talk of a conspiracy about the changing of the state of Florida to Bush in the early hours of the morning by first Fox news and then the other affliates. What about the calling of Florida for Gore, by ABC news and then all other affliates before the closing of all the polls in the state. Talking about unjust. Or what about in St Louis, where democrats got a restraining order that prevented the polls from closing at 7 PM to allow everyone who had not voted to come and vote. The rest of Missouri's polls closed at 7 PM, those in line at that time were allowed to vote, but no others were allowed to join the line. But St Louis allowed people to continue voting until almost midnight. UNJUST??? Yeah right.

As far as the "unjust war" please explain to me why this war is unjust.
And then I will address this issue.

dmk

Yes unjust. People's votes being blocked because of race by your own campaign. VERY VERY VERY UNJUST.

Calling out the military record of someone who served in the war when you avoided the very same war... YES, VERY VERY UNJUST.

Keep saying "yeah right" though. I think it is pretty cute that someone could be that stuck in their ideology to escape reality.

What I want to know is what happened to my post where I responded to his question about why the war is unjust?!

hevusa · 09-15-2005, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tadpole256

What I want to know is what happened to my post where I responded to his question about why the war is unjust?!

Damn... did you already see my post? Or did I hit "edit" instead of "quote" on your reply? If it is the latter I apologize.

tadpole256 · 09-15-2005, 12:29 PM

I suspect it was the latter... You censoring bastard! LOL J/K

hevusa · 09-15-2005, 12:52 PM

Shit. Sorry man. Try to reform your answer. I would appreciate it... and I'll try not to delete it this time

bullwinkle · 09-15-2005, 03:38 PM

Avoid the left blogosphere's wacky claims that the election was stolen. They understand that both parties played to win and tried really hard to win, and both parties made massive efforts to turn out their vote. John Kerry got 16 percent more votes than Al Gore. George W. Bush got 23 percent more votes in 2004 than in 2000.

sgtdmski · 09-16-2005, 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hevusa

Yes unjust. People's votes being blocked because of race by your own campaign. VERY VERY VERY UNJUST.

Calling out the military record of someone who served in the war when you avoided the very same war... YES, VERY VERY UNJUST.

Keep saying "yeah right" though. I think it is pretty cute that someone could be that stuck in their ideology to escape reality.

Show me proof of one documented case of someone being denied the right to vote because of their race, and only their race.

Kerry was the one who brought his Vietnam record into the race, are we to ignore it???? Don't blame his screw on us, he was the one who looked at the camera and said Reporting for Duty. Well we reported as well, and I guess we were just better at it than him. Again not are fault.

dmk

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode