Defending the Truth

  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Elections and Candidates
2008 Democratic Nominations - the running odds...

Elections and Candidates Debate anything about current elections or candidates running for any position in office.

Reply
Page 9 of 9 < 12345678 9
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-21-2005, 10:20 AM   #81 (permalink)
Head of Security
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Posts: 11,714
Points: 52,355, Level: 100
Points: 52,355, Level: 100 Points: 52,355, Level: 100 Points: 52,355, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is online now 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds
If a third party candidate ever wins, wea re gonna make sure that you shit yourself!
Whatever it takes...
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey
Old 09-21-2005, 02:23 PM   #82 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Posts: 8,493
Points: 27,119, Level: 97
Points: 27,119, Level: 97 Points: 27,119, Level: 97 Points: 27,119, Level: 97
Level up: 77%, 231 Points needed
Level up: 77% Level up: 77% Level up: 77%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hevusa is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds
If a third party candidate ever wins, wea re gonna make sure that you shit yourself!
as long as i get to toss it at a republican after...
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

"There is no such thing as laziness. Laziness is only lack of incentive." Norman Reider, MD

Morality is not contingent on religion to exist. Therefore religion only detracts from the purity of morality.
Old 09-21-2005, 08:26 PM   #83 (permalink)
Head of Security
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Posts: 11,714
Points: 52,355, Level: 100
Points: 52,355, Level: 100 Points: 52,355, Level: 100 Points: 52,355, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is online now 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds
If a third party candidate ever wins, wea re gonna make sure that you shit yourself!
as long as i get to toss it at a republican after...
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey
Old 09-21-2005, 09:23 PM   #84 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,670, Level: 38
Points: 3,670, Level: 38 Points: 3,670, Level: 38 Points: 3,670, Level: 38
Level up: 14%, 130 Points needed
Level up: 14% Level up: 14% Level up: 14%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebraskaboy
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebraskaboy
Tadpole, you just said Perot would have won, that weakens your entire statement.


What in gods name makes you think he would have had a chance? Your right anyone with a legitamate chance of winning is going to just drop out of the race...
I don't know, maybe the fact that until he dropped out he had a huge lead in the polls? That was my first clue... Remember I am old enough to remember his campaign
Tadpole, in 92 he only had about 20% of the vote before dropping out, that is hardly enough to declare him the victory. In 96 his support dropped to only 8%, real popular guy, he definately could have won.
Interesting how this part of Nebraskaboy's post is being ignored...
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Old 09-21-2005, 09:31 PM   #85 (permalink)
Head of Security
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Posts: 11,714
Points: 52,355, Level: 100
Points: 52,355, Level: 100 Points: 52,355, Level: 100 Points: 52,355, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is online now 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebraskaboy
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebraskaboy
Tadpole, you just said Perot would have won, that weakens your entire statement.


What in gods name makes you think he would have had a chance? Your right anyone with a legitamate chance of winning is going to just drop out of the race...
I don't know, maybe the fact that until he dropped out he had a huge lead in the polls? That was my first clue... Remember I am old enough to remember his campaign
Tadpole, in 92 he only had about 20% of the vote before dropping out, that is hardly enough to declare him the victory. In 96 his support dropped to only 8%, real popular guy, he definately could have won.
Interesting how this part of Nebraskaboy's post is being ignored...
Whereas his numbers are technically correct he's quite foolish if he thinks Perot could not have won. He dropped out relatively early on in the race.

Nebraskaboy is just a youngster, a smart one, but still just a kid. He likely does not remember what an exciting time in politics that was.

http://www.geocities.com/dave_enrich/ctd/3p.perot.html
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey
Old 09-21-2005, 09:36 PM   #86 (permalink)
Beer Man
 
onthefence's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: stuck in the middle
Posts: 4,609
Thanks: 28
Thanked 113 Times in 79 Posts
onthefence is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebraskaboy
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebraskaboy
Tadpole, you just said Perot would have won, that weakens your entire statement.


What in gods name makes you think he would have had a chance? Your right anyone with a legitamate chance of winning is going to just drop out of the race...
I don't know, maybe the fact that until he dropped out he had a huge lead in the polls? That was my first clue... Remember I am old enough to remember his campaign
Tadpole, in 92 he only had about 20% of the vote before dropping out, that is hardly enough to declare him the victory. In 96 his support dropped to only 8%, real popular guy, he definately could have won.
Interesting how this part of Nebraskaboy's post is being ignored...
Indeed, by the middle of the summer before the 1992 elections, Perot, who had technically not yet declared his candidacy, was in a statistical dead heat with Bush, and had a ten point lead over Clinton. Polls and pundits predicted Perot's presidency. One group projected that by election day between 43 and 51 percent of voters would support Perot, and that he would "easily win." APSA president Lowi called Perot's support "unprecedented."
"We could not now take time for further search or consideration, our victuals being much spent, especially our beer." - William Bradford



Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right.....

Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!
Old 09-21-2005, 10:01 PM   #87 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,670, Level: 38
Points: 3,670, Level: 38 Points: 3,670, Level: 38 Points: 3,670, Level: 38
Level up: 14%, 130 Points needed
Level up: 14% Level up: 14% Level up: 14%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthefence
Polls and pundits predicted Perot's presidency. One group projected that by election day between 43 and 51 percent of voters would support Perot, and that he would "easily win."
Wow!
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Old 09-22-2005, 06:13 AM   #88 (permalink)
Head of Security
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Posts: 11,714
Points: 52,355, Level: 100
Points: 52,355, Level: 100 Points: 52,355, Level: 100 Points: 52,355, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is online now 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthefence
Polls and pundits predicted Perot's presidency. One group projected that by election day between 43 and 51 percent of voters would support Perot, and that he would "easily win."
Wow!
Yeah he raised a lot of support and got a lot of people on both sides of the fence thinking. He was a very viable candidate.
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey
Old 09-22-2005, 08:25 AM   #89 (permalink)
Beer Man
 
onthefence's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: stuck in the middle
Posts: 4,609
Thanks: 28
Thanked 113 Times in 79 Posts
onthefence is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthefence
Polls and pundits predicted Perot's presidency. One group projected that by election day between 43 and 51 percent of voters would support Perot, and that he would "easily win."
Wow!
Yeah he raised a lot of support and got a lot of people on both sides of the fence thinking. He was a very viable candidate.
even more so had he picked a different VP
"We could not now take time for further search or consideration, our victuals being much spent, especially our beer." - William Bradford



Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right.....

Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!
Old 09-22-2005, 11:25 AM   #90 (permalink)
Head of Security
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Posts: 11,714
Points: 52,355, Level: 100
Points: 52,355, Level: 100 Points: 52,355, Level: 100 Points: 52,355, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is online now 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthefence
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthefence
Polls and pundits predicted Perot's presidency. One group projected that by election day between 43 and 51 percent of voters would support Perot, and that he would "easily win."
Wow!
Yeah he raised a lot of support and got a lot of people on both sides of the fence thinking. He was a very viable candidate.
even more so had he picked a different VP
Yeah, Admiral Stockdale was a great man, but a poor politician.
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey
Reply
Page 9 of 9 < 12345678 9

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 PM.

Contact Us - Defending the Truth - Archive - Top

 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites 

Recommended Sites