Defending the Truth

Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Freedom of Speech

Freedom of Speech Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; How far do you feel freedom of speech should go?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-18-2007, 02:50 PM   #31 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,981
Country:
Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa View Post
There is a clear difference between shorts and underwear.
What is the difference?
Sponsored Links
Old 09-18-2007, 02:50 PM   #32 (permalink)
Citizen
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Country:
Points: 650, Level: 12
Points: 650, Level: 12 Points: 650, Level: 12 Points: 650, Level: 12
Level up: 50%, 50 Points needed
Level up: 50% Level up: 50% Level up: 50%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
redwolfcolt is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mytmouse57 View Post
Anyway, the whole "baggy pants" thing is still in? Wow, most "fashion statements" along those lines don't last more than a year at the most.. but this one seems to have been around for... damn, at least 10 or 12.

What's wrong with kids these days? Don't they know the meaning of "Ohhh... that's SO last week!"
Seems to be one of the only trend that STARTS with white kids and goes global. LMAO
Old 09-18-2007, 02:51 PM   #33 (permalink)
*Premium Member*
Premium Member
 
pensacola_niceman's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pensacola, FL
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,235
Country:
Points: 16,708, Level: 82
Points: 16,708, Level: 82 Points: 16,708, Level: 82 Points: 16,708, Level: 82
Level up: 72%, 142 Points needed
Level up: 72% Level up: 72% Level up: 72%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
pensacola_niceman is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
What is the difference?
Don't the British refer to "pants" as underwear?
Old 09-18-2007, 02:52 PM   #34 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,663
Country:
Points: 24,478, Level: 95
Points: 24,478, Level: 95 Points: 24,478, Level: 95 Points: 24,478, Level: 95
Level up: 13%, 872 Points needed
Level up: 13% Level up: 13% Level up: 13%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
fxashun is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by akuma View Post
If this ban holds up in court, I want to see a ban for obese people wearing spandex.


Attachment 152

Should this be banned too? Her pants do not look baggy to me.....
I'd just like for her to just run around nude. In my bedroom. Until I catch her. Then....child support payments....Damn buzz kill
Old 09-18-2007, 02:57 PM   #35 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,981
Country:
Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pensacola_niceman View Post
Don't the British refer to "pants" as underwear?
Yes.

Trousers are worn on top of pants in the rest of the English-speaking world.


But why the fuss about exposing boxer shorts when people walk around almost everywhere in shorts? Men and women?

Apart from the fact it looks stupid!

If these dudes took off their sagging jeans, and walked around in shorts, then presumably nobody would complain?
Old 09-18-2007, 03:04 PM   #36 (permalink)
Citizen
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Country:
Points: 650, Level: 12
Points: 650, Level: 12 Points: 650, Level: 12 Points: 650, Level: 12
Level up: 50%, 50 Points needed
Level up: 50% Level up: 50% Level up: 50%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
redwolfcolt is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Yes.

Trousers are worn on top of pants in the rest of the English-speaking world.

But why the fuss about exposing boxer shorts when people walk around almost everywhere in shorts? Men and women?

Apart from the fact it looks stupid!

If these dudes took off their sagging jeans, and walked around in shorts, then presumably nobody would complain?
Sure, but here in America they are called something different. You shouldn't be so xenophobic; embrace different cultures and different dialects. It's what makes the world so wonderful!
Old 09-18-2007, 03:06 PM   #37 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,491
Country:
Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Level up: 89%, 113 Points needed
Level up: 89% Level up: 89% Level up: 89%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Those two statements have no logical connection.

You are just flailing around against "religion"!
Some people think that morals are only possible from a religious source. That couldn't be more false. In fact it only detracts from the purity of morality because religion is based on a lie about God. Basing morality around a lie only adds immorality and confusion in the world as can be seen from manifest destiny, intolerance against personal morality (homosexuals), intolerance towards other religions, condeming natural behavior such as personal gradification and sex, etc.

When you base morality around a lie you introduce immorality into your life.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

"There is no such thing as laziness. Laziness is only lack of incentive." Norman Reider, MD

Morality is not contingent on religion to exist. Therefore religion only detracts from the purity of morality.
Old 09-18-2007, 03:06 PM   #38 (permalink)
Council Member
 
akuma's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,474
Country:
Points: 4,188, Level: 41
Points: 4,188, Level: 41 Points: 4,188, Level: 41 Points: 4,188, Level: 41
Level up: 19%, 162 Points needed
Level up: 19% Level up: 19% Level up: 19%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via Yahoo to akuma
akuma is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
What is the difference?
I was doing a quick research on this and was horrified when I came across Museum of Menstruation and Women's Health.

Otherwise, I think it is guy's 'underwear' when the garment has a fly. I gave up the search for girl's underwear after the above link.
One pill makes you larger and one pill makes you small,
And the ones that mother gives you don't do anything at all.
Old 09-18-2007, 03:16 PM   #39 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,981
Country:
Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa View Post
Some people think that morals are only possible from a religious source. That couldn't be more false. In fact it only detracts from the purity of morality because religion is based on a lie about God. Basing morality around a lie only adds immorality and confusion in the world as can be seen from manifest destiny, intolerance against personal morality (homosexuals), intolerance towards other religions, condeming natural behavior such as personal gradification and sex, etc.

When you base morality around a lie you introduce immorality into your life.
Leaving aside your continued ignorance on the meaning of truth - and your intolerance of people of faith - what do YOU base morality on?
Old 09-18-2007, 03:17 PM   #40 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,981
Country:
Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by akuma View Post
I was doing a quick research on this and was horrified when I came across Museum of Menstruation and Women's Health.

Otherwise, I think it is guy's 'underwear' when the garment has a fly. I gave up the search for girl's underwear after the above link.
Shorts have flies too.

As long as the boxer shorts have a button fly are they acceptable??

I love these deep philosophical debates!
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites