Defending the Truth
Earth
Click here for free registeration..
Quick Search
11/23/07 - Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!

Go Back   Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Speech Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; How far do you feel freedom of speech should go?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-12-2007, 08:20 PM   #51 (permalink)
Partisan
 
garysher's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,371
Thanks: 101
Thanked 184 Times in 158 Posts

Points: 25,062, Level: 95
Points: 25,062, Level: 95 Points: 25,062, Level: 95 Points: 25,062, Level: 95
Level up: 96%, 288 Points needed
Level up: 96% Level up: 96% Level up: 96%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHenry View Post
Because it's poor form to just constantly ask questions, constantly criticize, but never reveal any of your own exact views on these matters.

All you two do is state opinion without any substantiation.

If you explain why you hold those opinions then you form a platform for a debate.

Try to introduce the word "because" into some of your rants.
__________________

garysher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 08:26 PM   #52 (permalink)
Citizen
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 599, Level: 11
Points: 599, Level: 11 Points: 599, Level: 11 Points: 599, Level: 11
Level up: 12%, 1 Points needed
Level up: 12% Level up: 12% Level up: 12%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHenry View Post
I asked Gary the same question in another thread JJ, let's see if answers either of us....

He can't or else it will expose him.
Jenifer Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 08:27 PM   #53 (permalink)
Villiage Idiot
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 943, Level: 16
Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16
Level up: 17%, 57 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
All you two do is state opinion without any substantiation.

If you explain why you hold those opinions then you form a platform for a debate.

.
We have been explaining them, ie, you don't have the right to violate basic moral laws, now unless you don't support these basic moral laws, why would you stick up for the violaters?
DavidHenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 08:31 PM   #54 (permalink)
Partisan
 
garysher's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,371
Thanks: 101
Thanked 184 Times in 158 Posts

Points: 25,062, Level: 95
Points: 25,062, Level: 95 Points: 25,062, Level: 95 Points: 25,062, Level: 95
Level up: 96%, 288 Points needed
Level up: 96% Level up: 96% Level up: 96%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHenry View Post
We have been explaining them, ie, you don't have the right to violate basic moral laws, now unless you don't support these basic moral laws, why would you stick up for the violaters?

(Observe how we use the word "because")

Because there is a moral way to deal with people who violate moral laws.

And because slaughtering unarmed fleeing burglars in cold blood is a violation of a basic moral law

So why do YOU oppose basic moral laws?
__________________

garysher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 08:38 PM   #55 (permalink)
Villiage Idiot
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 943, Level: 16
Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16
Level up: 17%, 57 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post

Because there is a moral way to deal with people who violate moral laws.
What is it, and how effective is it?

Also, why write off the deterent value of legally allowing people to defend their property.

Existing laws, courts and police do not stop crime,.... crime in many cases is committed one on one, therefore the most effective crime prevention is the individual victim.

You're all about criminals rights and privileges....IMO, once you break and enter, you lose most rights, you're literally at the mercy of the mentality, capacity and weaponary of the occupant.

Stay out of the house, and no-one is hurt....problem solved.
DavidHenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 08:53 PM   #56 (permalink)
Partisan
 
garysher's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,371
Thanks: 101
Thanked 184 Times in 158 Posts

Points: 25,062, Level: 95
Points: 25,062, Level: 95 Points: 25,062, Level: 95 Points: 25,062, Level: 95
Level up: 96%, 288 Points needed
Level up: 96% Level up: 96% Level up: 96%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHenry View Post
What is it, and how effective is it?

Also, why write off the deterent value of legally allowing people to defend their property.

Existing laws, courts and police do not stop crime,.... crime in many cases is committed one on one, therefore the most effective crime prevention is the individual victim.

You're all about criminals rights and privileges....IMO, once you break and enter, you lose most rights, you're literally at the mercy of the mentality, capacity and weaponary of the occupant.

Stay out of the house, and no-one is hurt....problem solved.
Your naivety is almost as stunning as your incoherency!

Yet again - Do you support the rule of law or vigilante "justice"?
__________________

garysher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 09:09 PM   #57 (permalink)
Citizen
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 599, Level: 11
Points: 599, Level: 11 Points: 599, Level: 11 Points: 599, Level: 11
Level up: 12%, 1 Points needed
Level up: 12% Level up: 12% Level up: 12%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
rule of law
Who's rule of law? Your subjective criteria or an objective axiom. Remember, it was the "rule of law" to have open slavery, now it is only by rule of law.
Jenifer Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 09:14 PM   #58 (permalink)
Villiage Idiot
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 943, Level: 16
Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16
Level up: 17%, 57 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Yet again - Do you support the rule of law or vigilante "justice"?
If defending one's property and life is considered as vigilante, then yes.

Now back to you, are you a lawyer?
Also, how do you establish the difference between right and wrong?
You keep evading these questions, why?
DavidHenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 09:16 PM   #59 (permalink)
Villiage Idiot
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 943, Level: 16
Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16
Level up: 17%, 57 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenifer Johnson View Post
Who's rule of law? Your subjective criteria or an objective axiom. Remember, it was the "rule of law" to have open slavery, now it is only by rule of law.
Gary refuses to answer how he establishes between right and wrong{but I've asked him again}, so I think he's just gonna bite at our ankles.
DavidHenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2007, 09:17 PM   #60 (permalink)
Citizen
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 599, Level: 11
Points: 599, Level: 11 Points: 599, Level: 11 Points: 599, Level: 11
Level up: 12%, 1 Points needed
Level up: 12% Level up: 12% Level up: 12%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHenry View Post
You're all about criminals rights and privileges.....
That is the basic objective of Judaism, creating laws (legal system) to hide their criminality.
Jenifer Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes






All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.

DefendingTheTruth.com RSS2 Feed   Add to Google   Add to My Yahoo!   Add to My MSN
 

SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Created by: Jon-Kingsbury.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Proudly hosted by WireNine


Recommended Sites

Top Political Sites Poltical Topsites