It is patently hilarious how you claim that, but you DO NOT ACTUALLY SHOW ANY definition for "ability" or able to "function" which does what you claim...

Yet again, garysher blindly contradicts with NO substantiation.


I never claimed to be a functioning "heterosexual".
I said my ability to function procreatively is fully there. No impairment.

Try to keep track of what IS and IS NOT being said, as you just look terminally stupid as you can't keep track of the simplest things.


No.
It's you. You're an abusive < expletive deleted > who gets off on bullying people.
You push and you push and you push, and it gets noticed.
You'll whine and that you're the victim, but nobody is buying that stupid crap.

I would tell you that you need to interact with people on this message board like you do with real people in real life, but I don't think you do any of that "real life" stuff.
================================================== ===

And just for the record boys and girls, garysher has COMPLETELY dropped MOST of what was being discussed on "ability to function".
He attempted one obfuscation to change the subject, but overall he is running from his claim like he stole something...

In part, I chalk it up to simply pointing out over and over again when he has failed to address the actual point, and then repeating the actual point he could not address.

No.
It's you. You're an abusive < expletive deleted > who gets off on bullying people.
You push and you push and you push, and it gets noticed.
You'll whine and that you're the victim, but nobody is buying that stupid crap.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Moderators - take note!!



Take note of what? LOL you act like he did something wrong. He didnt insult you or anything he typed "<expletive deleted>" its your mind and your mind alone that fills in the blank to whatever word you want.
Or maybe you are crying to the Mods over his "but nobody is buying that stupid crap.".....If thats the reason then just leave these boards now and stop crying or how Foundit put it so well, "whine"ing. He didnt insult you in anyway, just your reasons and points that you want to believe.

Dont cry wolf when the sheep are perfectly safe Gary

Take note of what?
What did I do?
Please show me what rule I ACTUALLY broke.


Again, you CHANGE THE SUBJECT.
You only "address" the issue by trying over and over again to CHANGE the issue into something else.
We were not talking about "functioning" as a "father or father-to-be".
We were talking about "ability to function" and how you were trying to rewrite simple English to pretend that a man who was not hungry did not have the "ability to function" to eat something.

And even your new argument is ridiculously flawed and pointless. Pastors do not function as "fathers or fathers-to-be" (within the context of this discussion), yet they aren't criticized.
Ahhh yes. THAT is where you try to change the subject by idiotically asking me if I am saying that gays choose to be gay like priests choose to be priests. And even though I repeatedly answered the question, you were still too slow to get it. Not only that, but you ignored the ACTUAL POINT which points out the flaw in your argument.

But, like I said, you keep taking up some of the most RIDICULOUS positions which routinely get shot down.
You want to punish a woman who "nags" her husband just like a man who beats his wife, because they are using different "weapons of choice", and you run from that subject too when it's proven ridiculous.

Is all this foolishness a symptom of you trying to be just ridiculously obstinate?
Or is this ACTUALLY how you think in life?

[quote=foundit66;120169]

Again, you CHANGE THE SUBJECT.
You only "address" the issue by trying over and over again to CHANGE the issue into something else.
We were not talking about "functioning" as a "father or father-to-be".
We were talking about "ability to function" and how you were trying to rewrite simple English to pretend that a man who was not hungry did not have the "ability to function" to eat something.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Apparently you have difficult connecting the dots between the ability to function as a heterosexual by having sex with a woman, and the ability to become a father!

Did your parents never have that little chat with you about the birds and bees???

Your attempts to keep on trying to dodge are rather amusing and utterly unsuccessful. But we know you love to play semantical games all day long





And even your new argument is ridiculously flawed and pointless. Pastors do not function as "fathers or fathers-to-be" (within the context of this discussion), yet they aren't criticized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>

We already dealt with this flawed analogy earlier

But, like I said, you keep taking up some of the most RIDICULOUS positions which routinely get shot down.
You want to punish a woman who "nags" her husband just like a man who beats his wife, because they are using different "weapons of choice", and you run from that subject too when it's proven ridiculous.

/quote]

Now who's changing the subject?

If you want to get back into a discussion on how women can avoid marrying abusive men who they don't really know very well, then start a new thread where you can unload your victimisation doggerel.

I'll get the violin music cued up.

AGAIN you CHANGE THE SUBJECT.
NOBODY was talking about "ability to function as a HETEROSEXUAL".
Over and over again, you CHANGE THE SUBJECT.
We were talking about ability to PROCREATE.

Does such blatant dishonesty get you ANYWHERE in your REAL life?


No. You didn't.
You replied by idiotically asking if that meant I thought being gay was a choice, but you NEVER RESPONDED TO THE POINT of the argument.


Trust me.
I have the full realization that is not typical.
But it IS STILL ENTIRELY TRUE.


Dude, we FINISHED that discussion when you got kicked off the boards.
The only idiot who was stupid enough to hold such a mucked up position was evicted.
Our opinions are still on those threads.
If you want to continue being embarrassed, I suggest you go find them and continue the arguments you failed to address.

Maybe for starters, you can explain WHY these men who abused their wives didn't bother to get to know their wives well enough to realize that they would kill him after they started getting beaten????
Why are these men who abuse their wives not getting to know their wives well enough to see such a potential danger?

But you were already cowardly dodging THAT challenge well before you got booted off.

People don't have to be straight in order to procreate.
Geez. It's like you're TRYING to be stupid.

And AGAIN you change the subject.
NOBODY said anything about "homosexual couples".

You are just thoroughly incapable of admitting the obvious.
No wonder that when somebody actually does occasionally find their opinion coinciding with some minor aspect of yours, the phrase inevitably comes out "I can't believe I have some agreement with garysher, but..."