Defending the Truth

Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Gay Marriage

Gay Marriage Debate and defend your political beliefs as to whether or not marriage should be only defined as a union between a man and a woman.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2007, 09:04 PM   #11 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,981
Country:
Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
I did you moronic twit it is asking for a Judical review filed by one side. What does the other side have to say? Your presentation is not fair and balanced you are presenting one side that is being argued by an advocate.

You're tap dancing Win.

Tell us what you think about the case - should employees be threatened with dismissal for emailing information about family values? While their fellow employees can say what they like about homosexual activities?

Let's see just how fair minded you are win.
Sponsored Links
Old 07-23-2007, 09:09 PM   #12 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,657
Country:
Points: 24,465, Level: 95
Points: 24,465, Level: 95 Points: 24,465, Level: 95 Points: 24,465, Level: 95
Level up: 12%, 885 Points needed
Level up: 12% Level up: 12% Level up: 12%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
fxashun is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
I did you moronic twit it is asking for a Judical review filed by one side. What does the other side have to say? Your presentation is not fair and balanced you are presenting one side that is being argued by an advocate.
I thought it was a little outrageous myself, but when I googled it, looks like Gary is right on this one. Pro-family speech is automatically hate speech I guess. Damn.
Old 07-23-2007, 09:12 PM   #13 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,981
Country:
Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
I thought it was a little outrageous myself, but when I googled it, looks like Gary is right on this one. Pro-family speech is automatically hate speech I guess. Damn.
What kind of society are we allowing ourselves to become?

This case is a good example of why the homosexual activists have to be confronted and challenged with their very own arguments.
Old 07-23-2007, 09:16 PM   #14 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
winston53660's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,019
Points: 10,549, Level: 68
Points: 10,549, Level: 68 Points: 10,549, Level: 68 Points: 10,549, Level: 68
Level up: 25%, 301 Points needed
Level up: 25% Level up: 25% Level up: 25%
Activity: 65%
Activity: 65% Activity: 65% Activity: 65%
winston53660 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
I thought it was a little outrageous myself, but when I googled it, looks like Gary is right on this one. Pro-family speech is automatically hate speech I guess. Damn.

What he posted was a filing for a Judicial review by lawyers in a case they lost. Do you seriously think in a filing lawyers are going to present anything that harms there chance of getting this review?

He is up to his usual deceptive tricks. There is more than just this side's lawyers story to this case and I will not say one way or the other what these women were up to. After all these women lawyers arguing their case for them.
Old 07-23-2007, 09:24 PM   #15 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,677
Country:
Points: 46,876, Level: 100
Points: 46,876, Level: 100 Points: 46,876, Level: 100 Points: 46,876, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
It's funny that "pro-family" can be called bigotry.
it is NOT

it's using the word "natural" (as if homosexuals were not organic ) being used which is MEANT AND INTENDED to denigrate gay families.

if you're going to argue a side, can't you at least find a way to do it honestly
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance.

Bigotry is a social disease.
Old 07-23-2007, 09:29 PM   #16 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,981
Country:
Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
What he posted was a filing for a Judicial review by lawyers in a case they lost.

Nope. It was a copy of an Amicus brief that has been filed but not heard yet! So how could it be lost?

You make yourself look so gormless Win!
Old 07-23-2007, 09:31 PM   #17 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,981
Country:
Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100 Points: 31,280, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
it is NOT

it's using the word "natural" (as if homosexuals were not organic ) being used which is MEANT AND INTENDED to denigrate gay families.
How does that denigrate "gay families"??

A natural family has a mum, a dad and a child or children - just like yours did - that's a simple fact!

Two homosexuals who adopt is not a "natural family".
Old 07-23-2007, 09:32 PM   #18 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
winston53660's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,019
Points: 10,549, Level: 68
Points: 10,549, Level: 68 Points: 10,549, Level: 68 Points: 10,549, Level: 68
Level up: 25%, 301 Points needed
Level up: 25% Level up: 25% Level up: 25%
Activity: 65%
Activity: 65% Activity: 65% Activity: 65%
winston53660 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Nope. It was a copy of an Amicus brief that has been filed but not heard yet! So how could it be lost?

You make yourself look so gormless Win!

"We urge the Court to grant the requested Writ of
Certiorari"

Judicial review smarty pants

Old 07-23-2007, 09:34 PM   #19 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,657
Country:
Points: 24,465, Level: 95
Points: 24,465, Level: 95 Points: 24,465, Level: 95 Points: 24,465, Level: 95
Level up: 12%, 885 Points needed
Level up: 12% Level up: 12% Level up: 12%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
fxashun is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
it is NOT

it's using the word "natural" (as if homosexuals were not organic ) being used which is MEANT AND INTENDED to denigrate gay families.

if you're going to argue a side, can't you at least find a way to do it honestly
Wellll...A homosexual family is not a natural family. A family consists of a mother father and their offspring. We have variations of a theme with divorce, adoption, etc. But when we lose sight of what qualifies as natural we are going down a path where we will lose sight of what is human.
Old 07-23-2007, 10:03 PM   #20 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
mikelew007's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Flint, MI
Gender: Male
Posts: 787
Country:
Points: 4,744, Level: 43
Points: 4,744, Level: 43 Points: 4,744, Level: 43 Points: 4,744, Level: 43
Level up: 97%, 6 Points needed
Level up: 97% Level up: 97% Level up: 97%
Activity: 15%
Activity: 15% Activity: 15% Activity: 15%
Send a message via Yahoo to mikelew007
mikelew007 is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Thank you for being fair and balanced, at least on this issue.
Thanks I guess. I'm a big free speech guy, that's all. I can't find the contents of the E-mails in suspect anywhere, so unless someone can prove otherwise and show us that the writings were so extreme that action needed to be taken, there was no reason to deny the employees their right to free speech. The terms "pro-family" and "family values" are very politicized these days. Politicians, preachers, and pundits seem to think that they know what's better for our families than we do. I'm pro-family in the sense that I am for legislation that would actually help the family. Examples would include better education, better health insurance, helping the family pay for college, tax breaks for people raising children, things would actually make life easier for families.

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites