Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Gay Marriage

Gay Marriage Debate and defend your political beliefs as to whether or not marriage should be only defined as a union between a man and a woman.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-03-2007, 10:56 AM   #61 (permalink)
Council Member
 
forester814's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago 'burbs
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,414
Country:
Points: 12,201, Level: 72
Points: 12,201, Level: 72 Points: 12,201, Level: 72 Points: 12,201, Level: 72
Level up: 38%, 249 Points needed
Level up: 38% Level up: 38% Level up: 38%
Activity: 34%
Activity: 34% Activity: 34% Activity: 34%
Send a message via Yahoo to forester814
forester814 is offline
Reply With Quote
Lightbulb
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa View Post
Good point. There are still plenty of racists out there. I guess, just as in the case with civil rights, the law will have to address the bigots directly for things to improve.
I see no need to try to actually change bigotted people's thinking, just their behavior. Anti-discrimination laws and hate crime laws, among others, are working to address this, with admittedly questionable success.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa View Post
Honestly I really can't see how people can be against promoting love and family structure in the world. Insanity if you ask me!
My guess is it goes something like...
"Different scares me. But if different must exist, at least I can pretend to be superior. And pretending is easy if the law supports my fear."

It's not insanity, it's just fear overwhelming both compassion and common sense.
Sponsored Links
Old 08-03-2007, 11:12 AM   #62 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,874
Country:
Points: 28,474, Level: 99
Points: 28,474, Level: 99 Points: 28,474, Level: 99 Points: 28,474, Level: 99
Level up: 8%, 1,526 Points needed
Level up: 8% Level up: 8% Level up: 8%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by forester814 View Post
My guess is it goes something like...
"Different scares me. But if different must exist, at least I can pretend to be superior. And pretending is easy if the law supports my fear."

It's not insanity, it's just fear overwhelming both compassion and common sense.
I'm guessing you have a little more experience with this sort of thing so I will definitely take your word for it.

But the end result is the same... being anti-love! How can people really walk around the world in 2007 and be against love? It is amazing.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 08-03-2007, 11:21 AM   #63 (permalink)
Council Member
 
forester814's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago 'burbs
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,414
Country:
Points: 12,201, Level: 72
Points: 12,201, Level: 72 Points: 12,201, Level: 72 Points: 12,201, Level: 72
Level up: 38%, 249 Points needed
Level up: 38% Level up: 38% Level up: 38%
Activity: 34%
Activity: 34% Activity: 34% Activity: 34%
Send a message via Yahoo to forester814
forester814 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa View Post
I'm guessing you have a little more experience with this sort of thing so I will definitely take your word for it.
This sort of fear? Sadly, yes.
I've lived it myself, because of my uber-Catholic upbringing.
And I'm still related to it.

It is possible to overcome, though.
If I could do it, coming from where I came from, then anyone (who truly wants to) can do it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa View Post
But the end result is the same... being anti-love! How can people really walk around the world in 2007 and be against love? It is amazing.
You are right.
At the most basic level, it all boils down to choosing fear over love.

If the obfuscationists with their "handicaps" and their "natural families" and their "pedophilia" would stop and be REALLY honest with themselves, they would see that you are right.

Very well said, sir.
Old 08-03-2007, 04:17 PM   #64 (permalink)
Council Member
 
mytmouse57's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wyoming
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,784
Country:
Points: 5,060, Level: 45
Points: 5,060, Level: 45 Points: 5,060, Level: 45 Points: 5,060, Level: 45
Level up: 55%, 90 Points needed
Level up: 55% Level up: 55% Level up: 55%
Activity: 8%
Activity: 8% Activity: 8% Activity: 8%
mytmouse57 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
not a sicko - merely uninformed

as we learn the things we do that are harmful to others, society changes its attitudes toward them

I think you made a good observation there.

Also, in those days, people in general didn't live as long, and infant/child mortality rates were much higher. So there was a "need" per se., to start cranking out the babies as soon as possible.
If at first you don’t succeed – try, try again and then quit. There’s no sense in making a damned fool of yourself. – W.C. Fields

Old 08-03-2007, 04:26 PM   #65 (permalink)
Council Member
 
mytmouse57's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wyoming
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,784
Country:
Points: 5,060, Level: 45
Points: 5,060, Level: 45 Points: 5,060, Level: 45 Points: 5,060, Level: 45
Level up: 55%, 90 Points needed
Level up: 55% Level up: 55% Level up: 55%
Activity: 8%
Activity: 8% Activity: 8% Activity: 8%
mytmouse57 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa View Post
I'm guessing you have a little more experience with this sort of thing so I will definitely take your word for it.

But the end result is the same... being anti-love! How can people really walk around the world in 2007 and be against love? It is amazing.
Well, I think "love" is used to excuse a lot of crap. As they say in the country, "putting lipstick on a pig ain't gonna make it a movie star."

Be that as it may, I can see what you're saying, in that it's sort of insane to think we should have laws saying "you (person x) can't love him/her/them." WTF, are people going to stop having feelings because the law says otherwise?

There ARE certian exceptions of course. If you've ever read NAMBLA propoganda from back in the day, they would argue fervently, passionately and sincerly that an adult man and a 12-year-old boy really could have "love" together. And you know what, they were probably right, insofar as their feelings really were genuine. (The feelings of the men, that is.)

But, I think society was correct to step in and say.."No, you should not act on those feelings. The boys you want to feel those feelings with aren't capable of giving full and actual consent."
If at first you don’t succeed – try, try again and then quit. There’s no sense in making a damned fool of yourself. – W.C. Fields

Old 08-03-2007, 08:24 PM   #66 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
knot_e_lady's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,285
Country:
Points: 12,267, Level: 72
Points: 12,267, Level: 72 Points: 12,267, Level: 72 Points: 12,267, Level: 72
Level up: 55%, 183 Points needed
Level up: 55% Level up: 55% Level up: 55%
Activity: 18%
Activity: 18% Activity: 18% Activity: 18%
knot_e_lady is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mytmouse57 View Post
There ARE certian exceptions of course. If you've ever read NAMBLA propoganda from back in the day, they would argue fervently, passionately and sincerly that an adult man and a 12-year-old boy really could have "love" together. And you know what, they were probably right, insofar as their feelings really were genuine. (The feelings of the men, that is.)

But, I think society was correct to step in and say.."No, you should not act on those feelings. The boys you want to feel those feelings with aren't capable of giving full and actual consent."
FYI, while I wholeheartedly disagree with NAMBLA and everything they stand for, this concept is hardly a new one. It was quite accepted in Ancient Greece especially for a man to have sexual relations with boys. Heterosexual sex was only for propagation.
Old 08-03-2007, 09:58 PM   #67 (permalink)
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,352
Country:
Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by knot_e_lady View Post
FYI, while I wholeheartedly disagree with NAMBLA and everything they stand for, this concept is hardly a new one. It was quite accepted in Ancient Greece especially for a man to have sexual relations with boys. Heterosexual sex was only for propagation.
In fact, in ancient greece it was an important part of a boys mentorship...

it is called pederasty... Solon could tell us much more about this... he's the greek expert.
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey





Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 PM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites