Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Gay Marriage
I minored in LGBT studies

Gay Marriage Debate and defend your political beliefs as to whether or not marriage should be only defined as a union between a man and a woman.

Reply
Page 4 of 38 < 123 4 56789101112131415161718 > Last »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2007, 03:17 PM   #31 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,897
Country:
Points: 25,503, Level: 96
Points: 25,503, Level: 96 Points: 25,503, Level: 96 Points: 25,503, Level: 96
Level up: 16%, 847 Points needed
Level up: 16% Level up: 16% Level up: 16%
Activity: 43%
Activity: 43% Activity: 43% Activity: 43%
fxashun is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by knot_e_lady View Post
Fx, lots of people have given lots of reasons.

It isn't our fault you ignore facts that don't go along with your theories.
What reasons are there that don't rely on legal and consent. Both of which also form the crux of the abortion debate. If we can kill developing humans in the name of choice/consent/legal then why can't those same precepts be stretched to include sex with animals?

Legal and consent have been proven to be much more pliable than biology and physiology. That's why homosexuals compel us to ignore those concept when discussion human sexuality. Yet they cling steadfast to legal and consent.

How about a few of those "reasons" that I have heard about but never seen.
Sponsored Links
Old 09-10-2007, 03:19 PM   #32 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
knot_e_lady's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,263
Country:
Points: 11,985, Level: 71
Points: 11,985, Level: 71 Points: 11,985, Level: 71 Points: 11,985, Level: 71
Level up: 84%, 65 Points needed
Level up: 84% Level up: 84% Level up: 84%
Activity: 16%
Activity: 16% Activity: 16% Activity: 16%
knot_e_lady is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
What reasons are there that don't rely on legal and consent.

Don't rely on legal or consent?

ROFLMAO!!!

What else is there?
Old 09-10-2007, 03:19 PM   #33 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,595
Country:
Points: 33,978, Level: 100
Points: 33,978, Level: 100 Points: 33,978, Level: 100 Points: 33,978, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by knot_e_lady View Post
Fx, lots of people have given lots of reasons.

It isn't our fault you ignore facts that don't go along with your theories.

I haven't seen any reasons why homosexuals should have special classes devoted to them at college.

Can you really justify a class on "Gay and Lesbian Perspectives in Pop Music"??

Be honest, it's just another part of the homosexual agenda to try and convince us they're dysfunctional sexual preferences are somehow "normal".

Most people find the whole idea walks a fine line between comedy and insanity.
[IMG][/IMG]
Old 09-10-2007, 03:22 PM   #34 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,897
Country:
Points: 25,503, Level: 96
Points: 25,503, Level: 96 Points: 25,503, Level: 96 Points: 25,503, Level: 96
Level up: 16%, 847 Points needed
Level up: 16% Level up: 16% Level up: 16%
Activity: 43%
Activity: 43% Activity: 43% Activity: 43%
fxashun is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by knot_e_lady View Post
Don't rely on legal or consent?

ROFLMAO!!!

What else is there?
Where are the reasons. You seem to be well versed. Or are you also admitting that homosexuals are riding on the repeal of sodomy laws to try to render themselves "normal". Tha same can said for zoophiles since many states have not rewritten beastiality laws since they were included with the sodomy statutes.
Old 09-10-2007, 03:22 PM   #35 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,595
Country:
Points: 33,978, Level: 100
Points: 33,978, Level: 100 Points: 33,978, Level: 100 Points: 33,978, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by knot_e_lady View Post
Don't rely on legal or consent?

ROFLMAO!!!

What else is there?
Apparently legality and the principle of consent don't apply to any other dealings between humans and animals.

So why are they suddenly important when it comes to sexual relationships?

Why are you so opposed to the rights of tax paying zoophiles?

Why do you care what they do in the privacy of their own bedrooms?or stables? or kennels?
[IMG][/IMG]
Old 09-10-2007, 03:28 PM   #36 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,945
Country:
Points: 50,177, Level: 100
Points: 50,177, Level: 100 Points: 50,177, Level: 100 Points: 50,177, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
So why back off the comparison now?

Should we have a special class studying how left handed people have affected the history of the US?[/color]
Read my response to the FIRST time you posed this question.
I answered it in full.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance.

Bigotry is a social disease.

Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage."
Old 09-10-2007, 03:30 PM   #37 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,897
Country:
Points: 25,503, Level: 96
Points: 25,503, Level: 96 Points: 25,503, Level: 96 Points: 25,503, Level: 96
Level up: 16%, 847 Points needed
Level up: 16% Level up: 16% Level up: 16%
Activity: 43%
Activity: 43% Activity: 43% Activity: 43%
fxashun is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Apparently legality and the principle of consent don't apply to any other dealings between humans and animals.

So why are they suddenly important when it comes to sexual relationships?

Why are you so opposed to the rights of tax paying zoophiles?

Why do you care what they do in the privacy of their own bedrooms?or stables? or kennels?
There is no argument for homosexual behavior that doesn't also apply to zoosexuality. That's why they have been grouped together under the same sodomic name in the dictionary and until recently legally.
Old 09-10-2007, 03:30 PM   #38 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,945
Country:
Points: 50,177, Level: 100
Points: 50,177, Level: 100 Points: 50,177, Level: 100 Points: 50,177, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
And the same with sex with animals. There is a long human history there too. I don't see why anyone could be so up in arms about discussing the ramifications of adding classes about all kinds of deviant sexual urges. I still haven't seen anyone give any reason why they are so different other that they are icky. And even there, homosexuality is icky to many people too.
There have been MANY reasons given.

You just ignore them and go on with your IGNORANT questions. And when they're answered - and you look like the fool you are - you ask the same question AGAIN.

Anybody who is unable to discern between the rights given to United States citizens and animals is too fucking stupid to discuss issues of import to our society with adults.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance.

Bigotry is a social disease.

Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage."
Old 09-10-2007, 03:32 PM   #39 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,945
Country:
Points: 50,177, Level: 100
Points: 50,177, Level: 100 Points: 50,177, Level: 100 Points: 50,177, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by knot_e_lady View Post
Don't rely on legal or consent?

ROFLMAO!!!

What else is there?
LOL
The only similarity between homosexuality and sex with animals is that fxashun and gaysher are both fascinated, fixated, and obsessed about both.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance.

Bigotry is a social disease.

Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage."
Old 09-10-2007, 03:34 PM   #40 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,897
Country:
Points: 25,503, Level: 96
Points: 25,503, Level: 96 Points: 25,503, Level: 96 Points: 25,503, Level: 96
Level up: 16%, 847 Points needed
Level up: 16% Level up: 16% Level up: 16%
Activity: 43%
Activity: 43% Activity: 43% Activity: 43%
fxashun is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
We're discussing the rights of United States citizens. We're discussing the government recognition of law-abiding United States citizens and their families.

And zoophiles are law abiding in several states. What about their rights?
To the best of my knowledge, animals are not allowed to become United States citizens - nor are they able to enter a legally binding contract.

But that's not what we are taling about here. Additionally, why are the rights of zoophiles being impinged in states have have deemed zoosexuality illegal? Aren't they citizens too?
Your discussion of "zoophiles" is both insulting and ignorant. If you are so interested in discussing having sex with animals, perhaps you could start a thread and discuss that with others who have your interest, leaving this thread for those interested in the issue presented.
And the thought of homosexuals being included in the word marriage is insulting and ignorant to many people too.

We both know many people think the thought of homosexuality at all in insulting and ignorant.
Reply
Page 4 of 38 < 123 4 56789101112131415161718 > Last »

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM.

Defending the Truth - FAQ - Rules - Contact Us - Donate - Archive - Top

 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites 

Recommended Sites