Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Gay Marriage

Gay Marriage Debate and defend your political beliefs as to whether or not marriage should be only defined as a union between a man and a woman.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2008, 09:39 PM   #21 (permalink)
Citizen
 
Segep's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rek'woy
Gender: Male
Posts: 190
Country:
Points: 833, Level: 15
Points: 833, Level: 15 Points: 833, Level: 15 Points: 833, Level: 15
Level up: 33%, 67 Points needed
Level up: 33% Level up: 33% Level up: 33%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Segep is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mytmouse57 View Post
Nice sterotyping.

I'm assuming you're being sarcastic.
Only partly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mytmouse57 View Post
BTW, creative people are also notorious for suffering from depression, bi-polar disorder and other similar conditions.

So, in the that spirit, we should stop seeking effective treatments for those things in the name of good art.
You're talking to the wrong guy about that. I'm a big fan of good art.


I think we should leave people alone who don't want "fixed".
Sponsored Links
Old 01-09-2008, 09:50 PM   #22 (permalink)
Block Captain
 
dabateman's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Mexico
Gender: Male
Posts: 349
Country:
Points: 1,682, Level: 23
Points: 1,682, Level: 23 Points: 1,682, Level: 23 Points: 1,682, Level: 23
Level up: 82%, 18 Points needed
Level up: 82% Level up: 82% Level up: 82%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
dabateman is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mytmouse57 View Post
Again, I can fully understand why YOU don't wan't gay culture to dissapear. But if it did, in 200 years, would anybody really miss it?

I'm all for diversity. But with homosexuality, are we trying to normalize dysfunction in order to preserve "diversity?"
Where do we draw the line with "diversity?" What do we decide is simply above questioning?

These are tough questions, yes, and I don't pretend to have the answers. But if honest investigation, pondering and questioning is getting shouted down by "diversity..." well, that I have a problem wtih.
Would anyone really miss gay culture? Absolutely. When the reference was made to the modern function the gay culture you called it stereotypical. Fine. Simply because it is the stereotype doesn't mean it isn't accurate. Those are partial functions of gay culture.

If cultures like gay culture and deaf culture disappeared would anyone miss them in 200 years? No. They would not. Not because those cultures didn't add uniqueness to the mix, but because uniqueness will be shunned. If the public had the ability to pre-screen and modify their child in womb, diversity would be destroyed. The vast majority of the public would create children without genetic 'defects'. We would be breeding perfect babies, all the same. Just alike. We'd all have little perfect children with little perfect lives and be oblivious to the things we've left behind.

You like to make the comparison between homosexuality and sailing and how eventually both will pass over the horizon. Well there is a big difference between people and boats. That's been part of my argument all along. Each individual is unique and thus should be important. Respected. Brought into the mix. It is the unique individuals that challenge us to think, challenge us to grow and change. We, out of our desire for perfection, seek to eliminate this uniqueness and thus our future motivation.
Quote:
"You have to find the courage to talk to the people you don't know about things they don't want to hear."
Courtesy of the late great former Governor of Texas, Ann Richards
Old 01-09-2008, 10:21 PM   #23 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,977
Country:
Points: 50,519, Level: 100
Points: 50,519, Level: 100 Points: 50,519, Level: 100 Points: 50,519, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is online now
Reply With Quote
 
The problem with the whole idea is that there will always - ALWAYS - be some gay kids who are born - no matter how many tests are run. We know they can detect Down's Syndrome, and there is no shortage of kids with Down's Syndrome to fill the special ed classes in schools.
The difference being, though fewer than before, the ones who are gay that survive will live an even MORE DIFFICULT existence than the ones now do.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance.

Bigotry is a social disease.

Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage."
Old 01-10-2008, 09:42 AM   #24 (permalink)
A Funny Fellow
Premium Member
 
pensacola_niceman's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pensacola, FL
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,720
Country:
Points: 18,628, Level: 86
Points: 18,628, Level: 86 Points: 18,628, Level: 86 Points: 18,628, Level: 86
Level up: 56%, 222 Points needed
Level up: 56% Level up: 56% Level up: 56%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
pensacola_niceman is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabateman View Post
My first hunch would be to agree with you, but then I go back and realize that generally homosexual couples have higher disposable incomes than straight people and then your argument doesn't make sense. When gay couples have more money than straight couples and still aren't treated well, how do we explain that?
Quick answer to that: You have to be worth at least a million before most of the higher rights kick in. Middle class are only tolerated to the point of qualifying to buy that shit the saleman is trying to sell. Nobody gives a fuck about poor people.
Old 01-10-2008, 09:44 AM   #25 (permalink)
A Funny Fellow
Premium Member
 
pensacola_niceman's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pensacola, FL
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,720
Country:
Points: 18,628, Level: 86
Points: 18,628, Level: 86 Points: 18,628, Level: 86 Points: 18,628, Level: 86
Level up: 56%, 222 Points needed
Level up: 56% Level up: 56% Level up: 56%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
pensacola_niceman is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
The problem with the whole idea is that there will always - ALWAYS - be some gay kids who are born - no matter how many tests are run. We know they can detect Down's Syndrome, and there is no shortage of kids with Down's Syndrome to fill the special ed classes in schools.
The difference being, though fewer than before, the ones who are gay that survive will live an even MORE DIFFICULT existence than the ones now do.
Is this has what to do with having naked festivals in the woods? OOps, wrong thread!
Old 01-10-2008, 07:05 PM   #26 (permalink)
Council Member
 
mytmouse57's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wyoming
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,784
Country:
Points: 5,060, Level: 45
Points: 5,060, Level: 45 Points: 5,060, Level: 45 Points: 5,060, Level: 45
Level up: 55%, 90 Points needed
Level up: 55% Level up: 55% Level up: 55%
Activity: 7%
Activity: 7% Activity: 7% Activity: 7%
mytmouse57 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Segep View Post
Only partly.



You're talking to the wrong guy about that. I'm a big fan of good art.


I think we should leave people alone who don't want "fixed".
You seem to be resting on the assumption that.
A: Only gay people create good art.
B: If homosexuality could be reversed, it would destroy the creativity in those people.

An I'm all for leaving people alone who don't want to be fixed. Unless, of course, what's broken with them causes them to be a threat to themsevles or others... which homosexuality does not.
If at first you don’t succeed – try, try again and then quit. There’s no sense in making a damned fool of yourself. – W.C. Fields

Old 01-10-2008, 07:12 PM   #27 (permalink)
Council Member
 
mytmouse57's Avatar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wyoming
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,784
Country:
Points: 5,060, Level: 45
Points: 5,060, Level: 45 Points: 5,060, Level: 45 Points: 5,060, Level: 45
Level up: 55%, 90 Points needed
Level up: 55% Level up: 55% Level up: 55%
Activity: 7%
Activity: 7% Activity: 7% Activity: 7%
mytmouse57 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dabateman View Post
Would anyone really miss gay culture? Absolutely. When the reference was made to the modern function the gay culture you called it stereotypical. Fine. Simply because it is the stereotype doesn't mean it isn't accurate. Those are partial functions of gay culture.

If cultures like gay culture and deaf culture disappeared would anyone miss them in 200 years? No. They would not. Not because those cultures didn't add uniqueness to the mix, but because uniqueness will be shunned. If the public had the ability to pre-screen and modify their child in womb, diversity would be destroyed. The vast majority of the public would create children without genetic 'defects'. We would be breeding perfect babies, all the same. Just alike. We'd all have little perfect children with little perfect lives and be oblivious to the things we've left behind.

You like to make the comparison between homosexuality and sailing and how eventually both will pass over the horizon. Well there is a big difference between people and boats. That's been part of my argument all along. Each individual is unique and thus should be important. Respected. Brought into the mix. It is the unique individuals that challenge us to think, challenge us to grow and change. We, out of our desire for perfection, seek to eliminate this uniqueness and thus our future motivation.
Dabateman, all that rest on the assumption that the state of homosexuality is an objectivly desirable one to begin with. I think that question is, nowadays, padded with a lot of political correctness and flat out bullshit, IMO.

Be that as it may, I understand that some, indeed many, gay people are perfectly happy that way, and are able to live full, well-rounded lives.

Even so, I know a succesful professional man who has a severe palsey.. and he is happy and lives a full-well rounded life. But does that mean we should stop trying to find a reversal of that condition?

Again, we can assign "uniqueness" and "diversity" to all sorts of things. Severe near-sightedness runs in my family.. and I have it. So, many of my distant anscestors who lived in the days before corrective lenses probably got along just fine, and were in their own way unique and probably had a way of looking at and experiencing life that is now pretty much gone for good.
Still, does that make me boring or my life empty?

You see, your reasoning seems to rest on the assumption that there's a finite number of ways to be unique or diverse.. and if we take some away in efforts to reverse certian conditions... the "unique" pool will eventually be drained.

I don't think that's the case. I think if every infirmity of the human condition is cured.... which might be entirely possible someday... there will still be countless ways in which people will be unique and diverse.
If at first you don’t succeed – try, try again and then quit. There’s no sense in making a damned fool of yourself. – W.C. Fields

Old 01-10-2008, 07:17 PM   #28 (permalink)
Citizen
 
Segep's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rek'woy
Gender: Male
Posts: 190
Country:
Points: 833, Level: 15
Points: 833, Level: 15 Points: 833, Level: 15 Points: 833, Level: 15
Level up: 33%, 67 Points needed
Level up: 33% Level up: 33% Level up: 33%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Segep is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mytmouse57 View Post
You seem to be resting on the assumption that.
A: Only gay people create good art.
B: If homosexuality could be reversed, it would destroy the creativity in those people.

An I'm all for leaving people alone who don't want to be fixed. Unless, of course, what's broken with them causes them to be a threat to themsevles or others... which homosexuality does not.
I said I was partly kidding, didn't I?
Old 01-10-2008, 07:33 PM   #29 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,907
Country:
Points: 25,586, Level: 96
Points: 25,586, Level: 96 Points: 25,586, Level: 96 Points: 25,586, Level: 96
Level up: 24%, 764 Points needed
Level up: 24% Level up: 24% Level up: 24%
Activity: 26%
Activity: 26% Activity: 26% Activity: 26%
fxashun is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Segep View Post
I said I was partly kidding, didn't I?
I love Myt's posting style. He is my idol. If I had his style with my assholicity, I'd be a forum terror.
Old 01-10-2008, 07:52 PM   #30 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
Nightrider's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 736
Country:
Points: 4,867, Level: 44
Points: 4,867, Level: 44 Points: 4,867, Level: 44 Points: 4,867, Level: 44
Level up: 59%, 83 Points needed
Level up: 59% Level up: 59% Level up: 59%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Nightrider is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
I love Myt's posting style. He is my idol. If I had his style with my assholicity, I'd be a forum terror.
I think you're getting there, Fx. . . Keep up the good work!

BTW, I dig your new avatar (you're my hero).

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites