Defending the Truth

yes

yes he is




or should be

I don't dislike homosexuality. It just doesn't make logical sense. So there is something wrong with it. Just like any other birth defect. I don't dislike a person with a cleft palate. But there is something wrong with that condition.

I have never expressed a personal dislike for anyone here. Unless provoked of course. All you guys is kewl wit me. Even my good friend Tristan.

The un-naturalness argument won't be discredited until someone comes up with a valid purpose cause and reason for homosexuality. And no one has. Especially one which describes why a person would be born with a sexual instinct that has absolutely no evolved physical facilitation.

Until then, being gay is no different from conjoined twins in that the human body was not evolved for it. Yet it exists.

Really? So, when you said...

(For those that supported the FLDS raid...)http://www.defendingthetruth.com/religion/17296-those-supported-flds-raid-12.html#post169809

...what did you mean?

If you don't dislike something AND don't like something, what's left?
Having no opinion on it?

I don't like the idea of homosexuality. It doesn't make logical sense. But just as I respect a polygamists right to screw all the women that he can get his hands on, and call them wives as long as he doesn't flagrantly flount them in my face, I have no problem with a person being gay, just don't make a big deal out of it. I don't ask chicks to sit on balloons everywhere I go. People into scat don't smear poop on themselves in public. I don't want to know about it.

I don't like the idea of doing drugs, but I have a friend that pops acid tabs every now and then. There's a difference.

I have neighbors two doors down that are gay. Nice guys. I'd invite them to dinner. But I still find the fact that they love each other a bit off for a human being. If they came to my door with a petition for gay marriage, I wouldn't sign it. And if they ask me "why" I'd be honest. If they decide to not like me after that, no skin off my back. I just tell it the way I feel.

Like I told you when you first joined this site. I don't make homosexuality an end to my relationship with someone, but if they want to make my feeling it is aberrant the end of my relationship with them, tough, I'll just not have a friend.

LOL

If somebody doesn't just accept your insults and offensive attitudes at face value - and enjoy your company in spite of your obnoxious views - you'll not have them for a 'friend?'

LOL

what a loss

I didn't ask you to come here. The topic of discussion is homosexuality. If I'm not honest I'm lying. Obviously you are just used to a lot of people lying to you.
I may be blunt, but I don't believe in making my ideas nice and pretty. You don't like it...frankly you can kiss my ass and put me on ignore.

My neighbors' homosexuality is not a topic of conversation. But if he decides to make it such, don't get pissed if I say what I feel. I can discuss race and not get pissed if someone has problems with Black people. They might have a damn good reason. But obviously they don't have too much problem if otherwise we get along just fine as long as we don't make it a topic of conversation.

that isn't "getting along"

that's being lied to

In what way?

An ignorant person, who believes the person they're "getting along" with is inferior due to any innate quality or minority group the person belongs to, is being dishonest...dishonesty isn't the best basis for "getting along" ... at least not in my opinion.

The only thing - and trust me, I do mean 'only' - that I can say is in your favor is that you're upfront and honest about your ignorant bigotry and prejudice. That allows me to realize and be candid that you ARE inferior, and I don't have to pretend to "get along" with you, even though your ignorance and antiquated prejudices and points of view repulse me.

I prefer being an honest enemy to a deceitful and dishonest 'friend.'

Ever thought that homosexuality might be a "natural" form of population control?