Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Gay Marriage
Homosexual marriage in CA qualifies for November ballot

Gay Marriage Debate and defend your political beliefs as to whether or not marriage should be only defined as a union between a man and a woman.

Reply
Page 6 of 25 < 12345 6 7891011121314151617181920 > Last »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-05-2008, 10:56 AM   #51 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,987
Country:
Points: 50,735, Level: 100
Points: 50,735, Level: 100 Points: 50,735, Level: 100 Points: 50,735, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is online now 		Reply With Quote
 
ditto
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance.

Bigotry is a social disease.

Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage."
Sponsored Links
Old 06-05-2008, 11:03 AM   #52 (permalink)
A Funny Fellow
Premium Member
 
pensacola_niceman's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pensacola, FL
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,750
Country:
Points: 18,792, Level: 86
Points: 18,792, Level: 86 Points: 18,792, Level: 86 Points: 18,792, Level: 86
Level up: 89%, 58 Points needed
Level up: 89% Level up: 89% Level up: 89%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
pensacola_niceman is offline 		Reply With Quote
Wouldn't it be Really Funny?
Wouldn't it be really funny if the California November ballot overturned the recent judicial ruling? All the gay marriages would then be considered null and invalid. All of those expensive gay marriage ceremonies would be for not. Isn't that the funniest thing you can imagine?
Old 06-05-2008, 11:06 AM   #53 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
winston53660's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,189
Points: 11,773, Level: 71
Points: 11,773, Level: 71 Points: 11,773, Level: 71 Points: 11,773, Level: 71
Level up: 31%, 277 Points needed
Level up: 31% Level up: 31% Level up: 31%
Activity: 38%
Activity: 38% Activity: 38% Activity: 38%
winston53660 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pensacola_niceman View Post
Wouldn't it be really funny if the California November ballot overturned the recent judicial ruling? All the gay marriages would then be considered null and invalid. All of those expensive gay marriage ceremonies would be for not. Isn't that the funniest thing you can imagine?
No not really.
http://winstoncreative.com/
Old 06-05-2008, 11:16 AM   #54 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,987
Country:
Points: 50,735, Level: 100
Points: 50,735, Level: 100 Points: 50,735, Level: 100 Points: 50,735, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is online now 		Reply With Quote
 
no
the funniest thing would be using the word 'not' for 'naught'

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance.

Bigotry is a social disease.

Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage."
Old 06-05-2008, 12:30 PM   #55 (permalink)
Not God
 
Tigerwiccan's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,249
Country:
Points: 10,889, Level: 69
Points: 10,889, Level: 69 Points: 10,889, Level: 69 Points: 10,889, Level: 69
Level up: 10%, 361 Points needed
Level up: 10% Level up: 10% Level up: 10%
Activity: 2%
Activity: 2% Activity: 2% Activity: 2%
Tigerwiccan is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pensacola_niceman View Post
Wouldn't it be really funny if the California November ballot overturned the recent judicial ruling? All the gay marriages would then be considered null and invalid. All of those expensive gay marriage ceremonies would be for not. Isn't that the funniest thing you can imagine?
I don't think they would be able to nullify legal marriages. The other ones that Newsome ordered were void because they were done illegally. But these will all be completely legitimate marriages. I think that is what will sway the people to not vote to overturn the ruling, since it will already be happening. And it's CA we're talking about here.
Old 06-05-2008, 01:23 PM   #56 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,907
Country:
Points: 25,586, Level: 96
Points: 25,586, Level: 96 Points: 25,586, Level: 96 Points: 25,586, Level: 96
Level up: 24%, 764 Points needed
Level up: 24% Level up: 24% Level up: 24%
Activity: 18%
Activity: 18% Activity: 18% Activity: 18%
fxashun is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pride_of_sterling_city View Post
I'll have been married 25 years on June 10 (hopefully, and that's really not a joke). From a practical viewpoint, if two consenting adults want to try it, why not let them?

Note: I said two consenting adults because we really don't need the usual bestiality/pedophilia followups.
The fact you have to qualify it like that means you know that "two consenting adults" is a weak standard. There's plenty that "two consenting adults" can do that are illegal or socially repugnant.
Especially as it relates to deviant sex.
Old 06-05-2008, 01:31 PM   #57 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,678
Country:
Points: 34,404, Level: 100
Points: 34,404, Level: 100 Points: 34,404, Level: 100 Points: 34,404, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigerwiccan View Post
I don't think they would be able to nullify legal marriages. The other ones that Newsome ordered were void because they were done illegally. But these will all be completely legitimate marriages. I think that is what will sway the people to not vote to overturn the ruling, since it will already be happening. And it's CA we're talking about here.
When the ballot successfully mandates an amendment to protect traditional marriage, any homosexual "marriages" that happen in the interim will be voided, or outlawed.

This includers marriages of homosexuals from other states who try to "wag the dog" back home.

I think you'll find the people of California will teach these 4 activist judges a lesson and say Yes.

Don't judge California on the 'homopoovres' parading around Folsom St or West Hollywood.

Outside of the 2 major metropolitan areas, rural California is still quite conservative, and so is the huge latin community.
[IMG][/IMG]

Doggone it darn right you betcha bless your heart maverick
Old 06-05-2008, 01:32 PM   #58 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,678
Country:
Points: 34,404, Level: 100
Points: 34,404, Level: 100 Points: 34,404, Level: 100 Points: 34,404, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pride_of_sterling_city View Post
I'll have been married 25 years on June 10 (hopefully, and that's really not a joke). From a practical viewpoint, if two consenting adults want to try it, why not let them?

Note: I said two consenting adults because we really don't need the usual bestiality/pedophilia followups.
So you think sibling and parent/child marriage should be legalised?

Just think of the savings on attorney fees and all the extra insurance discounts?

Isn't that what marriage is all about?
[IMG][/IMG]

Doggone it darn right you betcha bless your heart maverick
Old 06-05-2008, 01:45 PM   #59 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,907
Country:
Points: 25,586, Level: 96
Points: 25,586, Level: 96 Points: 25,586, Level: 96 Points: 25,586, Level: 96
Level up: 24%, 764 Points needed
Level up: 24% Level up: 24% Level up: 24%
Activity: 18%
Activity: 18% Activity: 18% Activity: 18%
fxashun is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
When the ballot successfully mandates an amendment to protect traditional marriage, any homosexual "marriages" that happen in the interim will be voided, or outlawed.

This includers marriages of homosexuals from other states who try to "wag the dog" back home.

I think you'll find the people of California will teach these 4 activist judges a lesson and say Yes.

Don't judge California on the 'homopoovres' parading around Folsom St or West Hollywood.

Outside of the 2 major metropolitan areas, rural California is still quite conservative, and so is the huge latin community.
I wish you guys luck. But I'm not very confident there, Gary.
Old 06-05-2008, 02:08 PM   #60 (permalink)
Village Idiot
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Not In Sterling City
Gender: Male
Posts: 610
Country:
Points: 2,925, Level: 33
Points: 2,925, Level: 33 Points: 2,925, Level: 33 Points: 2,925, Level: 33
Level up: 17%, 125 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
pride_of_sterling_city is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pensacola_niceman View Post
Is it true that your wife is a former beauty queen? What about that little air force you own? Is your new found civility here going to unveil the horseshit you've been posting for years?
There were two people yahoo trolling with POSC names. I trolled with a POSC type name on yahoo on some boards pretending to be a bible thumper braggart who acted as if Sterling City was some great sophisticated metropolis. Because I'm a fairly well known Yahoo troller, fake POSC trolls came out. A fake POSC troll came into the St. Lucia board, using the same schtick I used but then shifting it into all the b.s. that made everyone think that POSC was TJ (and he might very well have been).

I quit using the original POSC and actually trolled the imitation POSC on the St. Lucia board. You may remember my anti POSC poetry that was posted from time to time. However, I spent most of my time on bong's board on yahoo, at least until it died off. Cmdr jalepeno and I are friends, and he knew when I was posting and knew (I think) that the shitty POSC was not me because it was clearly not my trolling style.

As anyone would figure out, there is no wealthy rancher with jets and a beauty queen wife in Sterling City, Texas. 20 years ago, I had the dubious pleasure of driving through Sterling City, and it may be one of the crappiest looking small towns I've ever been in.

I initially came in here to do a little old school POSC trolling, but I quickly realized that my imitator had created some real animosity against POSC. Therefore, I quickly switched the troll off and now post as I normally would if I was not trolling.
Reply
Page 6 of 25 < 12345 6 7891011121314151617181920 > Last »

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.

Defending the Truth - FAQ - Rules - Contact Us - Donate - Archive - Top

 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites 

Recommended Sites