Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Gay Marriage

Gay Marriage Debate and defend your political beliefs as to whether or not marriage should be only defined as a union between a man and a woman.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2008, 09:01 AM   #11 (permalink)
Village Idiot
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Not In Sterling City
Gender: Male
Posts: 610
Country:
Points: 2,925, Level: 33
Points: 2,925, Level: 33 Points: 2,925, Level: 33 Points: 2,925, Level: 33
Level up: 17%, 125 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
pride_of_sterling_city is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigerwiccan View Post
The only "hmmm" is people like you who are still stuck in the past with your prejudices.
Norway is some deluded haven for liberals.

"The highest margin was in Norway, where 74% of respondents backed Mr Kerry compared with just 7% for Mr Bush. The strongest negative views about US foreign policy appeared to come from Germany, where 83% said their view of the US had got worse. "

In Sterling City, Bush won over Kerry by 543-1. The one won't happen again.
Sponsored Links
Old 06-12-2008, 09:52 AM   #12 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,907
Country:
Points: 25,586, Level: 96
Points: 25,586, Level: 96 Points: 25,586, Level: 96 Points: 25,586, Level: 96
Level up: 24%, 764 Points needed
Level up: 24% Level up: 24% Level up: 24%
Activity: 14%
Activity: 14% Activity: 14% Activity: 14%
fxashun is offline
Reply With Quote
 
What's prejudicial about considering a union that is 100% dysfunctional ineligible for marriage?
There's no more reason for homosexual unions that any of the other unions formed by sexually deviant human orientations.

Might as well allow gays to marry if humans can do this there...

Last edited by fxashun; 06-12-2008 at 09:56 AM.
Old 06-12-2008, 10:09 AM   #13 (permalink)
Not God
 
Tigerwiccan's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,260
Country:
Points: 10,985, Level: 69
Points: 10,985, Level: 69 Points: 10,985, Level: 69 Points: 10,985, Level: 69
Level up: 34%, 265 Points needed
Level up: 34% Level up: 34% Level up: 34%
Activity: 7%
Activity: 7% Activity: 7% Activity: 7%
Tigerwiccan is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
What's prejudicial about considering a union that is 100% dysfunctional ineligible for marriage?
There's no more reason for homosexual unions that any of the other unions formed by sexually deviant human orientations.
100% "dysfunctional" hetero couples are already legally able to marry. But no matter how many times we say that, you don't seem to get that concept. You can't use sexual "dysfunction" as a reason to deny marriage.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tigerwiccan For This Useful Post:
AlicornsPrayer (06-12-2008), Catus Felidae (06-12-2008), tristanrobin (06-12-2008)
Old 06-12-2008, 10:09 AM   #14 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,995
Country:
Points: 50,861, Level: 100
Points: 50,861, Level: 100 Points: 50,861, Level: 100 Points: 50,861, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 99%
Activity: 99% Activity: 99% Activity: 99%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pride_of_sterling_city View Post
I don't think the acceptance of gay marriage by some third world country is going to help the cause.
Norway = third world?!
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance.

Bigotry is a social disease.

Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage."
Old 06-12-2008, 10:13 AM   #15 (permalink)
Not God
 
Tigerwiccan's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,260
Country:
Points: 10,985, Level: 69
Points: 10,985, Level: 69 Points: 10,985, Level: 69 Points: 10,985, Level: 69
Level up: 34%, 265 Points needed
Level up: 34% Level up: 34% Level up: 34%
Activity: 7%
Activity: 7% Activity: 7% Activity: 7%
Tigerwiccan is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
Norway = third world?!
I'm pretty sure he was just trying to be funny there.
Old 06-12-2008, 10:41 AM   #16 (permalink)
Village Idiot
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Not In Sterling City
Gender: Male
Posts: 610
Country:
Points: 2,925, Level: 33
Points: 2,925, Level: 33 Points: 2,925, Level: 33 Points: 2,925, Level: 33
Level up: 17%, 125 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
pride_of_sterling_city is offline
Reply With Quote
Let's Look at the Countries That Accept Gay Marriage
· Canada (Civil Marriage Act, S.C. 2005, c. 33)

Canada is a washed up country that lingers to our north solely because the country is too boring to invade. Does anyone outside of Canada speak Canadian any more? No. Case closed.

· Netherlands (Act on the Opening Up of Marriage, 2001)

The legislators got wasted at an Amsterdam hashish bar and passed a series of ludicrous laws, including this one.

· Spain (Boletin Oficial del Estado, July 3, 2005)

Spaniards are nothing more than a bunch of effeminate Mexicans, so of course they would pass gay marriage. Have you seen the pants worn by matadors? Have they passed a straight marriage bill yet?

· South Africa (Civil Unions Bill, B 26B-2006)1

This bill was passed to distract the country from its rampant crime rate.

· Norway, Act No. 40

All the hot womem emigrated from Norway to Sweden during the 40's, which in turn caused the depletion of Norway's straight community. Norway is now the most gay country.
Old 06-12-2008, 10:45 AM   #17 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,995
Country:
Points: 50,861, Level: 100
Points: 50,861, Level: 100 Points: 50,861, Level: 100 Points: 50,861, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 99%
Activity: 99% Activity: 99% Activity: 99%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is offline
Reply With Quote
 
are you really PN?
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance.

Bigotry is a social disease.

Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage."
Old 06-12-2008, 11:48 AM   #18 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,907
Country:
Points: 25,586, Level: 96
Points: 25,586, Level: 96 Points: 25,586, Level: 96 Points: 25,586, Level: 96
Level up: 24%, 764 Points needed
Level up: 24% Level up: 24% Level up: 24%
Activity: 14%
Activity: 14% Activity: 14% Activity: 14%
fxashun is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigerwiccan View Post
100% "dysfunctional" hetero couples are already legally able to marry. But no matter how many times we say that, you don't seem to get that concept. You can't use sexual "dysfunction" as a reason to deny marriage.
But "man and woman" is the requirement. ANY man and woman can marry. That's where the "fair and equal" comes into play. I use "same gender" as a reason to deny marriage, not dysfunction. There is no more reason to allow same gender people to marry than any other f'd up union. allow man and woman to marry pretty much covers everyone. Cept a few f'd up people.
Old 06-12-2008, 12:07 PM   #19 (permalink)
Not God
 
Tigerwiccan's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,260
Country:
Points: 10,985, Level: 69
Points: 10,985, Level: 69 Points: 10,985, Level: 69 Points: 10,985, Level: 69
Level up: 34%, 265 Points needed
Level up: 34% Level up: 34% Level up: 34%
Activity: 7%
Activity: 7% Activity: 7% Activity: 7%
Tigerwiccan is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
But "man and woman" is the requirement. ANY man and woman can marry. That's where the "fair and equal" comes into play. I use "same gender" as a reason to deny marriage, not dysfunction. There is no more reason to allow same gender people to marry than any other f'd up union. allow man and woman to marry pretty much covers everyone. Cept a few f'd up people.
But "man and woman" IS NOT the universal requirement anymore. Are you living in Fantasyland?
The Following User Says Thank You to Tigerwiccan For This Useful Post:
AlicornsPrayer (06-12-2008)
Old 06-12-2008, 12:34 PM   #20 (permalink)
Village Idiot
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Not In Sterling City
Gender: Male
Posts: 610
Country:
Points: 2,925, Level: 33
Points: 2,925, Level: 33 Points: 2,925, Level: 33 Points: 2,925, Level: 33
Level up: 17%, 125 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
pride_of_sterling_city is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigerwiccan View Post
But "man and woman" IS NOT the universal requirement anymore. Are you living in Fantasyland?
Marriage is between a man and a woman -- there will never be any spintrian marriages in Texas.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites