| ||||||
| Gay Marriage Debate and defend your political beliefs as to whether or not marriage should be only defined as a union between a man and a woman. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #11 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Village Idiot Join Date: May 2008 Location: Not In Sterling City Gender: ![]() Posts: 610 Country: ![]()
| Quote:
"The highest margin was in Norway, where 74% of respondents backed Mr Kerry compared with just 7% for Mr Bush. The strongest negative views about US foreign policy appeared to come from Germany, where 83% said their view of the US had got worse. " In Sterling City, Bush won over Kerry by 543-1. The one won't happen again. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsored Links |
| | #12 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| SIMPLETON Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: In my skin Gender: ![]() Posts: 8,907 Country: ![]()
| What's prejudicial about considering a union that is 100% dysfunctional ineligible for marriage? There's no more reason for homosexual unions that any of the other unions formed by sexually deviant human orientations. Might as well allow gays to marry if humans can do this there... Last edited by fxashun; 06-12-2008 at 09:56 AM. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | #13 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Not God ![]() Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,260 Country: ![]()
| 100% "dysfunctional" hetero couples are already legally able to marry. But no matter how many times we say that, you don't seem to get that concept. You can't use sexual "dysfunction" as a reason to deny marriage. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tigerwiccan For This Useful Post: |
| | #14 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Partisan Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: New Haven, CT Gender: ![]() Posts: 7,995 Country: ![]()
| Quote:
![]() *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance. Bigotry is a social disease. Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage." | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | #15 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Not God ![]() Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,260 Country: ![]()
| | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | #16 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Village Idiot Join Date: May 2008 Location: Not In Sterling City Gender: ![]() Posts: 610 Country: ![]()
| Let's Look at the Countries That Accept Gay Marriage · Canada (Civil Marriage Act, S.C. 2005, c. 33) Canada is a washed up country that lingers to our north solely because the country is too boring to invade. Does anyone outside of Canada speak Canadian any more? No. Case closed. · Netherlands (Act on the Opening Up of Marriage, 2001) The legislators got wasted at an Amsterdam hashish bar and passed a series of ludicrous laws, including this one. · Spain (Boletin Oficial del Estado, July 3, 2005) Spaniards are nothing more than a bunch of effeminate Mexicans, so of course they would pass gay marriage. Have you seen the pants worn by matadors? Have they passed a straight marriage bill yet? · South Africa (Civil Unions Bill, B 26B-2006)1 This bill was passed to distract the country from its rampant crime rate. · Norway, Act No. 40 All the hot womem emigrated from Norway to Sweden during the 40's, which in turn caused the depletion of Norway's straight community. Norway is now the most gay country. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | #17 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Partisan Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: New Haven, CT Gender: ![]() Posts: 7,995 Country: ![]()
| are you really PN? *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance. Bigotry is a social disease. Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage." | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | #18 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| SIMPLETON Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: In my skin Gender: ![]() Posts: 8,907 Country: ![]()
| But "man and woman" is the requirement. ANY man and woman can marry. That's where the "fair and equal" comes into play. I use "same gender" as a reason to deny marriage, not dysfunction. There is no more reason to allow same gender people to marry than any other f'd up union. allow man and woman to marry pretty much covers everyone. Cept a few f'd up people. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | #19 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Not God ![]() Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 1,260 Country: ![]()
| Quote:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Tigerwiccan For This Useful Post: | AlicornsPrayer ![]() (06-12-2008) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 AM.


















Linear Mode