YOU DON'T GET IT, DO YOU?

YOU HAVE TO LIE - ON THE FORMS - IN ORDER TO BE A PRACTICING HOMOSEXUAL AND GIVE BLOOD. YOU HAVE TO KNOWINGLY LIE.


I don't donate, having been overseas, BECAUSE THE RED CROSS CRITERIA - FOR SAFETY REASONS - SAYS I AM AT RISK OF HAVING SOMETHING IN MY BLOOD THAT COULD MAKE A RECIPIENT SICK. And because I have integrity, and a sense of decency, I don't put others at risk because of my own personal, sick, depraved agenda.

Get it?

so - you won't validate your accusation that I have killed people????

do you ever back up any of your hysterical, overly-dramatic, and transparently self-serving rhetoric?

Yes, you have to not fill out the forms honestly. You don't really lie - you just don't tic the box.

That's why it's an act of civil disobedience.

If you didn't have to lie, it wouldn't be much of a protest, would it?

d'uh

I never said you killed people, you stupid little prick.

I said you are a LIAR, I said you are SICK, I said you are DEPRAVED and I said you are EVIL. And ALL of those FACTS are in response to the FACT that you knowingly lie in order to give blood - as a practicing homosexual - and therefore, put innocent people at risk. And this is against very strict Red Cross safety regulations.

Now, how about some answers here, Mister United Church of Christ Christian...

- What's the name of your pastor? I'd LOVE to call him and ask him if your behavior is consistent with his preaching or teaching. WHAT'S HIS NAME AND NUMBER?
- How can you even call yourself a Christian? Your homosexual lifestyle is directly contradictory to the Bible, and your evil behavior of giving blood is pure evil. IS THIS TYPICAL OF A UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST MEMBER?
- And I'd also like you to tell me where, in the Bible, I can find that verse that says being black is a punishment from God.



That ought to keep your evil little lying mind busy for awhile.

YOU ARE A BOLD-FACED LIAR.

Spin it any way you want, you sick bastard. You don't really lie - you just refuse to tell the truth - and in so doing, put innocent people at risk.

I suppose that's what they teach at your United Church of Christ though, isn't it?

Not if you know you're not HIV positive. Let's talk about you're christian values, which hold that a blood transfusion from a healthy homosexual is immoral even if it is to save a life. Find anything christian about that? I don't give a damn if I get a transfusion from a gay man because I know it's been examined and tested multiple times. As long as he's responsible sexually and doesn't use a needle there's no problem when it comes to HIV. You still haven't answered my question related to minorities, either.

I know I'm opening a can of worms, but we're using reliable sources in this debate, meaning no ancient manuscripts with no confirmed author or original publishing information, much less ones claiming the world population sprung from two people whose offspring, miraculously, had no negative side effects from inbreeding. Any college professor would give you an F for plagiarism, or just chastize you for faulty information.

Spin it any way YOU want, because your hostility to homosexuality is still prejudice, and there's nothing sacred about it.

What the heck are you even talking about?

really?
I said that I donated my blood (which is HIV negative - has always been - and I am in virtually 0 risk of acquiring it) as an act of civil disobedience.

you replied

Now, if that was not being used as an analogy, what was it?

I will admit - maybe I've completely misread your posts and you're just really really lousy at communication.