You mean the blacks?

Oh wait. I forgot.
If it's the blacks, we obviously have to have the common sense to realize that the ENTIRE GROUP is not guilty for the actions of a few people...

But when it comes to GAYS, THEY are obviously all denigrated for whatever some are accused of doing.


Yeah. Because OBVIOUSLY ALL gays are like one individual person.
Do we really need to start down the road of pointing "liar" fingers Jefferson? Because I've got a list of your lies as well...

Also, you quote Paul Cameron who has been PROVEN to be a pathological LIAR. What would lead anybody to believe that all your anti-gay friends are any different?


You link to Paul Cameron, which has been PROVEN to be a liar...
And you complain when we point that out.

And then you complain about somebody linking to "Rainbow Alliance"???

Try to get it straight Jefferson.
Can a web-site be condemned just for bias, or can it not be condemned just for bias?

Or is it just the case where YOUR web-sites cannot be criticized for bias, but OURS obviously have to be discarded for bias?

Yes FoundIt, blacks account for a disproportionate amount of crime too. But we can't honestly address that problem EITHER, can we?


Try to get this STRAIGHT FoundIt:
1%-2% of the general population is homosexual. That small minority is responsible for a HUGE percentage of the violent sexual crimes committed in the United States.


Now, do run along and see if you and your friend Trista can spin this into something other than what it CLEARLY is!

Even if 100% of all homosexuals today are guilty of being rapists, pedophiles, and mass murderers, I still wouldn't give a damn about homosexuals or homosexuality because each and every one of those homosexuals are individuals who are capable of choosing not to commit those crimes.

Of course, I would give a damn about rapists, pedophiles, and mass murderers in the sense that I would want to see them punished for their crimes.

But, homosexuality isn't a crime. And, in my opinion, it should never be considered as a crime.

So, I guess, you'd like to blame all homosexuals for the crimes of some percentage of homosexuals?

If this is true, then what would make you any different, ideologically speaking, than a racist who blames all members of a race for the actions of some of the members of that same race?

Are you spitting on your monitor as you type that?

Open your eyes, for crying out loud!


Are you going to actually, seriously, tell me that if 100% of homosexuals were rapists & murderers, you wouldn't care?

Wow! I guess EVERYTHING is permissible, as long as the perpetrator is gay!

No...

...at least judiciously fair people shouldn't.

They will just leave that "broad brush stroke painting" to racists who, in some cases, are also homophobes.

Reading comprehension isn't your forte, huh...Jefferson?

CORRECTION: WRITING is not yours.


Either write something that makes sense, or don't write anything at all.

Yeah, you're probably right.

It's BETTER to let black against black crime CONTINUE to take the lives of more blacks than any one other cause.

After all, addressing the issues makes a person racist.

Perhaps, from here on, I won't write anything in reply to you at all.

Ummm...bye!

NOTHING is better than what you HAVE been writing.


Excuses, excuses, excuses... That's all we ever get when it comes to violent and deviant behavior by homosexuals.