Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Gay Marriage

Gay Marriage Debate and defend your political beliefs as to whether or not marriage should be only defined as a union between a man and a woman.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-30-2007, 04:37 PM   #111 (permalink)
Hio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Hio's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,819
Country:
Points: 4,862, Level: 44
Points: 4,862, Level: 44 Points: 4,862, Level: 44 Points: 4,862, Level: 44
Level up: 56%, 88 Points needed
Level up: 56% Level up: 56% Level up: 56%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Hio is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
You seem to have a very low opinion of your fellow Americans.
Do explain.....
What Profit Is It To A Man...If He Gains The World But Loses His Own Soul {Matthew 16:26}
Sponsored Links
Old 04-30-2007, 04:38 PM   #112 (permalink)
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,893
Country:
Points: 39,710, Level: 100
Points: 39,710, Level: 100 Points: 39,710, Level: 100 Points: 39,710, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
1) You'll note that Garysher cowardly avoided the question.
He never stated if that was "equality" or not.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

Apparently I need to spell out the obvious to you

When everyone has the same rights/ privileges and are subject to the same qualifying criteria that is equality






2) And once again, we see the same crap, different day.
He claims "equality", but then he tries to JUSTIFY THE DISCRIMINATION.
Gays can't adopt in Florida. Straights can.
That isn't equality.
And while you lack the honesty and the courage to admit that, the rest of us realize the truth. It just plain isn't equality...

>>>>>>>>>>>>

See above



Saying an analogy is "ludicrous" or "wrong" isn't debate.
Once again, garysher blindly contradicts while giving ABSOLUTELY NO REASON WHY my analogy was wrong.

It's funny how on one hand you claim "equality".
But on the other hand, you justify the discrimination.

It's like saying "Jews and Christians are equal. As long as Jews choose to deny Christ, we'll march them off to the gas chambers. That's *equality*!"

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Don't be ridiculous - it has nothing at all to do with that and you know it. Your desperation is showing again







Then you're blind.
There have been plenty of people to pop on and give a comment.
Hell. Even Jaaaman is firmly against gay rights, but his opinion of you appears to be rather low.

Yet you still keep referring to yourself in the "plural"...
Still trying to think you have support, when the truth is that anybody who has met you doesn't support you at all...
Ah so you have you spoken to everyone who has ever met me??

Your posts become more deranged as the days wear on!!

Fact: Americans vote against homosexual marriage every chance they get. ERGO I represent the views of most Americans on this topic.

Hence I use plural with complete justification
Old 04-30-2007, 04:38 PM   #113 (permalink)
Hio
Moderator
Moderator
 
Hio's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,819
Country:
Points: 4,862, Level: 44
Points: 4,862, Level: 44 Points: 4,862, Level: 44 Points: 4,862, Level: 44
Level up: 56%, 88 Points needed
Level up: 56% Level up: 56% Level up: 56%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Hio is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
A lot MORE voters will like him AFTER he did that!

I don't believe any of the leading Dem candidates support homosexual marriage either

If you paid attention to anything except your ego you would hear that he LOST more voters AFTER he did that.
What Profit Is It To A Man...If He Gains The World But Loses His Own Soul {Matthew 16:26}
Old 05-01-2007, 07:02 AM   #114 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Apparently I need to spell out the obvious to you
When everyone has the same rights/ privileges and are subject to the same qualifying criteria that is equality
So, if a gay man cannot adopt and a straight man can adopt, do they have the same privilege?
The answer is "NO", but you'll never admit it...


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Don't be ridiculous - it has nothing at all to do with that and you know it. Your desperation is showing again
And once again, all garysher does is say "nay" with ABSOLUTELY NO EXPLANATION as to "it has nothing at all to do with that".
Because he can't...

It's funny how on one hand you claim "equality".
But on the other hand, you justify the discrimination.

It's like saying "Jews and Christians are equal. As long as Jews choose to deny Christ, we'll march them off to the gas chambers. That's *equality*!"


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Ah so you have you spoken to everyone who has ever met me??
No. Nor have I claimed to.
But when everyone I have seen who has ever met you distances themselves from you, the trend is obvious...


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Fact: Americans vote against homosexual marriage every chance they get. ERGO I represent the views of most Americans on this topic.
Again, NO. YOU do not.
You share AN OPINION with most Americans.
Just because you share AN OPINION with most americans DOES NOT mean you represent them.

Fred Phelps is also against gay marriage.
Does that mean HE "represents the views of most Americans on this topic"???

Your need to think you have company is downright pathological!
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 05-03-2007, 02:36 PM   #115 (permalink)
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,893
Country:
Points: 39,710, Level: 100
Points: 39,710, Level: 100 Points: 39,710, Level: 100 Points: 39,710, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
So, if a gay man cannot adopt and a straight man can adopt, do they have the same privilege?
The answer is "NO", but you'll never admit it...
>>>>>>>>>

Infact the answer is YES.

Everyone has the same privilege, and everyone can lose that privilege by indulging in inappropriate behaviour

It's really not that hard to grasp even for someone with extremely limited mental faculties






It's funny how on one hand you claim "equality".
But on the other hand, you justify the discrimination.
>>>>>>>>>>>

Try to understand the difference between discrimination and qualification.

Your hysterical nature wants to call everything discrimination just to provoke an argument and claim victimhood





It's like saying "Jews and Christians are equal. As long as Jews choose to deny Christ, we'll march them off to the gas chambers. That's *equality*!"
>>>>>>>>>>>

Nope. It is nothing at all like saying that. You are being hysterical again.




Again, NO. YOU do not.
You share AN OPINION with most Americans.
Just because you share AN OPINION with most americans DOES NOT mean you represent them.
Why not?
Old 05-03-2007, 07:29 PM   #116 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Infact the answer is YES.
Everyone has the same privilege, and everyone can lose that privilege by indulging in inappropriate behaviour
The law in Florida says NOTHING about behavior.
It doesn't say "people who engage in homosexual behavior cannot adopt".
It says GAYS cannot adopt, with no mention of behavior.

The answer is NO.
Gays and straights DO NOT have an "equal" capability to adopt.


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Try to understand the difference between discrimination and qualification.
Try to explain how there is any difference between the two that doesn't involve you liking or wanting the "qualification", and if you don't approve of the standard it is "discrimination".

ANY discriminatory practice can be labelled as "qualification".


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Nope. It is nothing at all like saying that.
And there he goes again.
Blindly repeating his claim, while providing ABSOLUTELY NO explanation as to why my analogy is wrong.

It's like saying "Jews and Christians are equal. As long as Jews choose to deny Christ, we'll march them off to the gas chambers. That's *equality*!"


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Why not?
Why do you ask me questions that are already answered?
And then FAIL to address the answer when I gave it?

Fred Phelps is also against gay marriage.
Does that mean HE "represents the views of most Americans on this topic"???
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 05-03-2007, 07:50 PM   #117 (permalink)
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,893
Country:
Points: 39,710, Level: 100
Points: 39,710, Level: 100 Points: 39,710, Level: 100 Points: 39,710, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
The law in Florida says NOTHING about behavior.
It doesn't say "people who engage in homosexual behavior cannot adopt".
It says GAYS cannot adopt, with no mention of behavior.

The answer is NO.
Gays and straights DO NOT have an "equal" capability to adopt.
>>>>>>>>>>>

Yes they do, providing they do not engage in inappropriate behaviours.



Try to explain how there is any difference between the two that doesn't involve you liking or wanting the "qualification", and if you don't approve of the standard it is "discrimination".

>>>>>>>>>
Blind people cannot get a driving licence. I approve of that qualification.





ANY discriminatory practice can be labelled as "qualification".

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

So why don't you use the word "qualification" instead of "discrimination"?

Could it be because you always prefer the more emotive, hysterical alternative that helps you appear to be a victim??







And there he goes again.
Blindly repeating his claim, while providing ABSOLUTELY NO explanation as to why my analogy is wrong.

It's like saying "Jews and Christians are equal. As long as Jews choose to deny Christ, we'll march them off to the gas chambers. That's *equality*!"
>>>>>>>>>>>>

What a ludicrous example. You really are scraping the barrel.

If you really want to try and use a Jewish analogy, then redefining marriage to accommodate homosexuals would be like redefining a bar mitzfah to suit a muslim







Why do you ask me questions that are already answered?
And then FAIL to address the answer when I gave it?

Fred Phelps is also against gay marriage.
Does that mean HE "represents the views of most Americans on this topic"???
Phelps represents the views of most Americans insofar as they oppose homosexual marriage and so does he.

How much longer do you want to keep up this ridiculous facade whilst being beaten like a dog?
Old 05-03-2007, 09:56 PM   #118 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Yes they do, providing they do not engage in inappropriate behaviours.
AGAIN all you do is blindly say "nay" with NO SUBSTANTIATION of why I am wrong.
The Florida law PROHIBITS any gay man, regardless of behavior, from adopting.
If a gay man has NEVER had sex with any other men, he will still be prohibited from adopting.

The law does not prohibit ANY straight person from adopting if that person has had sex with somebody of the same gender.

Your reply is false.


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Blind people cannot get a driving licence. I approve of that qualification.
A thorough non-sequitur, except to provide an example of PRECISELY what I was talking about.
You approve of this discrimination, so you label it as a "qualification".

It is STILL a discrimination. It is a JUSTIFIED discrimination with a legitimate state interest.



Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
So why don't you use the word "qualification" instead of "discrimination"?
If you will yield that qualification and discrimination are identical, I will do precisely that.
Will you acknowledge that the two are essentially the same, and that calling something a "qualification" instead of a "discrimination" does not magically (without any justification given) mute any explanation as to WHY the discrimination is justified?


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
If you really want to try and use a Jewish analogy, then redefining marriage to accommodate homosexuals would be like redefining a bar mitzfah to suit a muslim
You realize that you JUST ADMITTED that gays are precluded from marriage, don't you?

You can't stop doing it, can you. You can't stop contradicting yourself.
That will happen when you insist on pretending that black is white and up is down.

If you want to run with that analogy, there is NOTHING from preventing a muslim from holding a "bar mitzvah". The government would have to recognize the muslim bar mitzvah as JUST AS LEGITIMATE as the jewish one, otherwise it would be discrimination.


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Phelps represents the views of most Americans insofar as they oppose homosexual marriage and so does he.
So you "represent the views of most Americans" just like Phelps "represents the views of most Americans".
You and Phelps.
At least the analogy holds for how repugnant people find you...
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 05-04-2007, 06:55 PM   #119 (permalink)
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,893
Country:
Points: 39,710, Level: 100
Points: 39,710, Level: 100 Points: 39,710, Level: 100 Points: 39,710, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
AGAIN all you do is blindly say "nay" with NO SUBSTANTIATION of why I am wrong.
The Florida law PROHIBITS any gay man, regardless of behavior, from adopting.
If a gay man has NEVER had sex with any other men, he will still be prohibited from adopting.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Unlikely, as the Florida law prohibits homosexual COUPLES from adopting





The law does not prohibit ANY straight person from adopting if that person has had sex with somebody of the same gender.

Your reply is false.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Again - highly unlikely. You are clutching at straws again





If you will yield that qualification and discrimination are identical, I will do precisely that.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Sometimes they are identical and sometimes not.


Will you acknowledge that the two are essentially the same, and that calling something a "qualification" instead of a "discrimination" does not magically (without any justification given) mute any explanation as to WHY the discrimination is justified?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Discrimination is a value-laden term. Qualification is not




So you "represent the views of most Americans" just like Phelps "represents the views of most Americans".
You and Phelps.
At least the analogy holds for how repugnant people find you...
Phelps represents the views of most Americans insofar as they oppose homosexual marriage and so does he.
Old 05-04-2007, 08:35 PM   #120 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Unlikely, as the Florida law prohibits homosexual COUPLES from adopting
Why do you persist in stating the blatantly false?
Is it because you are completely clueless?
Do you think lying somehow gains you something in the short term?

You are utterly and completely wrong. Florida adoption law prohibits ALL gays from adopting, whether they be single or a couple.
Florida is the only state in the nation with a complete ban on adoption by gays, whether married or single.
CNN.com - Florida adoption ban

Please. Try to educate yourself before you open your mouth to reveal yourself ignorant.


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Again - highly unlikely. You are clutching at straws again
"highly unlikely"?
This only proves you have no clue what the law ACTUALLY says, and you're just guessing...


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Sometimes they are identical and sometimes not.
Again, I challenge you to show me a case where they are not identical.


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Discrimination is a value-laden term. Qualification is not
Precisely the reason YOU want to use the term "qualification" and not "discrimination".
And quite frankly, if you see discrimination as "value-laden", that is your own problem. I don't care what connotations people see in the word.
I am talking about it in its most basic sense, devoid of any positive or negative attributes. YOU on the other hand keep fixating on the negative attributes and can't get past that...


Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher
Phelps represents the views of most Americans insofar as they oppose homosexual marriage and so does he.
If anybody needed proof of your absolute lunacy, then this quote is it...
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites