Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Global Politics

Global Politics Debate US and International politics here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2007, 05:27 PM   #31 (permalink)
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Country:
Points: 6,721, Level: 53
Points: 6,721, Level: 53 Points: 6,721, Level: 53 Points: 6,721, Level: 53
Level up: 86%, 29 Points needed
Level up: 86% Level up: 86% Level up: 86%
Activity: 9%
Activity: 9% Activity: 9% Activity: 9%
baloney_detector is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyreay View Post
Thats because we won't go ourselves and actually try and make an agreement work. The whole middle east(except maybe Qatar, Israel, and the Saudis) think we are a bunch of scammers who are just there for oil (which I sure can't argue with). We wouldn't even talk to them ourselves. How would you view this if you were them? Don't get me wrong, I'm not sticking up for Irans Government. My point is simple. If we act like bullies we'll be considered bullies. We need to have the level headedness of someone applying logic, reason and learned experience, without pre-conceived notions and hate to actually have any kind of effect whatsoever>
Only an honest attempt from both sides will show if this is a workable solution. The chances, well, I wouldn't put any money on it.
The fact is, the US cannot rationally give the Iranian regime what they actually want.

So, the US has no leverage in any "talks" with Iran...no matter if the US talks with them directly or through a third party.

And I don't think you fully understand the nature of the Iranian regime as a whole.

They want to dominate the Middle East and turn it into one big theocratic and totalitarian state. And they want the end of all American and Western influence wherever Muslims live in this world. And they want the end of Israel.

But, none of these things are things that the US can offer them.

And, any "carrots" the US offers them isn't going to stop them from trying to achieve these goals.

And this is how its been for the past 28 years, no matter what the US has already offered and given to them during that time.
Sponsored Links
Old 09-14-2007, 05:59 PM   #32 (permalink)
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,695
Country:
Points: 34,629, Level: 100
Points: 34,629, Level: 100 Points: 34,629, Level: 100 Points: 34,629, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by baloney_detector View Post
The fact is, the US cannot rationally give the Iranian regime what they actually want.

So, the US has no leverage in any "talks" with Iran...no matter if the US talks with them directly or through a third party.

And I don't think you fully understand the nature of the Iranian regime as a whole.

They want to dominate the Middle East and turn it into one big theocratic and totalitarian state. And they want the end of all American and Western influence wherever Muslims live in this world. And they want the end of Israel.

But, none of these things are things that the US can offer them.

And, any "carrots" the US offers them isn't going to stop them from trying to achieve these goals.

And this is how its been for the past 28 years, no matter what the US has already offered and given to them during that time.
I think you have a one-sided view of the US relationship with Iran , and Iran's with Israel. And it sounds like it came straight from one of those wacky talk-radio show hosts!

Don't forget it was the Russians and Britain, supported by the US, who interfered in the internal affairs of Iran when they installed the Shah in 1941 and forced the abdication of his father.

And when the Shah was overthrown in 1979, the US gave him shelter, which provoked the hostage crisis.

Then the US backed Saddam and helped kill thousands of Iranians during the Iran-Iraq war. The very thing we criticise Iran for currently.

I recommend you watch the MSNBC or 60 minutes interview with Ahmadinejad where he explains some of the Iranian attitude to Israel, basically:

-the attacks on the Jews in WW2 were a European problem, so why give them a piece of land in the Middle East that belonged to Palestine? It would make more sense to form Israel in Bavaria or Idaho

- when he talks about "driving the Israelis into the sea" he means driving them out of Israel and restoring the land to Palestine, not necessarily about genocide

-when the US warns Iran and other foreign fighters to stay out of Iraq, Iran repeats the same line back at the US

I'm not trying to pretend they are right, only that they have a point of view that we never ever consider.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=http:...?v=ykd-syzZ4ZY



[IMG][/IMG]

Doggone it darn right you betcha bless your heart maverick
Old 09-14-2007, 07:56 PM   #33 (permalink)
Council Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,270
Points: 5,894, Level: 49
Points: 5,894, Level: 49 Points: 5,894, Level: 49 Points: 5,894, Level: 49
Level up: 72%, 56 Points needed
Level up: 72% Level up: 72% Level up: 72%
Activity: 7%
Activity: 7% Activity: 7% Activity: 7%
nuttyjoe is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Gary, you are correct. The US has a very two-sided attitude in the Middle East. This is why we can, and never will; be able to help peace along there. First of all, Do we honestly care about any of these countries? Realistically, outside of the oil in the Middle East- we don't. We have a large Jewish population here in America, so we prance about talking about wanting peace; but we just want the OIL. It's as simple as that.
Gary, you are also correct in what was said about America helping Saddam during the Iran-Iraq war. Wasn't this the same Saddam that we wanted toppled; and the reason our troops are still in Iraq?
People, this two-sided attitude will never get us anywhere- especially the Middle East. We must choose one view or the other. I agree that we must not allow the Isrealis to be left to the whims of the admitted hatred for them from the Arab nations there; but we must not think we can dictate policy the world over.
Old 09-14-2007, 09:55 PM   #34 (permalink)
Beer Man
Administrator
 
onthefence's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: stuck in the middle
Posts: 3,410
Country:
Thanks: 99
Thanked 270 Times in 156 Posts
onthefence is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuttyjoe View Post
It was also one one my son's favorite books.I had just remembered the line I quoted earlier because I had watched "Air Force One" the night before.

Did you take the quiz? I got all 5 correct
"We could not now take time for further search or consideration, our victuals being much spent, especially our beer." - William Bradford



Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right.....

Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!
Old 09-14-2007, 10:08 PM   #35 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
Nightrider's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 736
Country:
Points: 4,867, Level: 44
Points: 4,867, Level: 44 Points: 4,867, Level: 44 Points: 4,867, Level: 44
Level up: 59%, 83 Points needed
Level up: 59% Level up: 59% Level up: 59%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Nightrider is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthefence View Post
Did you take the quiz? I got all 5 correct
Yes, I took the quiz (got 3 out of 5) - never read the book.

One of them I got wrong was: If a mouse washes all your floors. . . I said that he'll charge you for it. The correct answer is - he'll want to take a nap.

How much sense does that make???

I mean, wouldn't the mouse want to get paid??
Old 09-14-2007, 10:10 PM   #36 (permalink)
Beer Man
Administrator
 
onthefence's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: stuck in the middle
Posts: 3,410
Country:
Thanks: 99
Thanked 270 Times in 156 Posts
onthefence is online now
Reply With Quote
 
I think kids understand the need to take a nap better than wanting to get paid.
"We could not now take time for further search or consideration, our victuals being much spent, especially our beer." - William Bradford



Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right.....

Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!

Last edited by onthefence; 09-15-2007 at 12:43 AM.
Old 09-14-2007, 10:11 PM   #37 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
Nightrider's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 736
Country:
Points: 4,867, Level: 44
Points: 4,867, Level: 44 Points: 4,867, Level: 44 Points: 4,867, Level: 44
Level up: 59%, 83 Points needed
Level up: 59% Level up: 59% Level up: 59%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Nightrider is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthefence View Post
I kids understand the need to take a nap better than wanting to get paid.
Yes, I guess you are right. . .

Wouldn't it be great to be a kid again? Sometimes, I think they are smarter than us adults. . .
Old 09-14-2007, 10:59 PM   #38 (permalink)
Council Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,270
Points: 5,894, Level: 49
Points: 5,894, Level: 49 Points: 5,894, Level: 49 Points: 5,894, Level: 49
Level up: 72%, 56 Points needed
Level up: 72% Level up: 72% Level up: 72%
Activity: 7%
Activity: 7% Activity: 7% Activity: 7%
nuttyjoe is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthefence View Post
Did you take the quiz? I got all 5 correct
I scored a 20.
Old 09-15-2007, 01:04 PM   #39 (permalink)
Council Member
 
baloney_detector's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,225
Country:
Points: 6,721, Level: 53
Points: 6,721, Level: 53 Points: 6,721, Level: 53 Points: 6,721, Level: 53
Level up: 86%, 29 Points needed
Level up: 86% Level up: 86% Level up: 86%
Activity: 9%
Activity: 9% Activity: 9% Activity: 9%
baloney_detector is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
I think you have a one-sided view of the US relationship with Iran , and Iran's with Israel. And it sounds like it came straight from one of those wacky talk-radio show hosts!

Don't forget it was the Russians and Britain, supported by the US, who interfered in the internal affairs of Iran when they installed the Shah in 1941 and forced the abdication of his father.

And when the Shah was overthrown in 1979, the US gave him shelter, which provoked the hostage crisis.

Then the US backed Saddam and helped kill thousands of Iranians during the Iran-Iraq war. The very thing we criticise Iran for currently.

I recommend you watch the MSNBC or 60 minutes interview with Ahmadinejad where he explains some of the Iranian attitude to Israel, basically:

-the attacks on the Jews in WW2 were a European problem, so why give them a piece of land in the Middle East that belonged to Palestine? It would make more sense to form Israel in Bavaria or Idaho

- when he talks about "driving the Israelis into the sea" he means driving them out of Israel and restoring the land to Palestine, not necessarily about genocide

-when the US warns Iran and other foreign fighters to stay out of Iraq, Iran repeats the same line back at the US

I'm not trying to pretend they are right, only that they have a point of view that we never ever consider.
Oh, I think I'm fairly knowledgeable about the history of Iran (and Israel).

And I think I'm fairly aware of the Iranian regime's viewpoint.

So, what you said regarding Iran isn't news to me.

But, considering the observation that Iran is essentially a totalitarian state with a regime that actively acts toward achieving their lofty goal of conquering the Muslim world (in their own subversive way) and engulfing it in their theofascist form of governance, and given the observation that the Iranian regime seeks to essentially eliminate Western secularism, democracy, and capitalism from the world's stage, what outcome do you wish to see for the Middle East...and the World?

Perhaps it would be best if all states always acted in ways that always promotes the sovereignty of all other states and their interests and good will among all nations.

But, this isn't the way the world works.

All nations, in fact, act to protect, by military means if necessary, their own interests...even at the expense of some other nation's sovereignty and self-interests.

And, practical matters will eventually force almost all people to choose sides because they will realize that their ideals can only be achieved one battle at a time and because compromises will have to be made of their ideals along the way.

So, which would you prefer;

1) The continuation and spread of the secular, democratic, and capitalistic mindset the Western world has so far successfully embarked upon as a model for the world?

Or,

2) The abdication of that possible "ideal" future world state and the return of fascism to the world's stage...albeit with a theocratic propensity?

(Don't get me wrong. The world aught to be a fair place. But I'm a realist at heart, rather than an idealist. This, of course, doesn't excuse wrongs that are done by the US...or any other state. But, again, people will eventually have to take sides...myself included.)

[I'm curious, how exactly could Israel suddenly cease to exist without the very really potential for genocide? I mean, Israelis aren't going to simply pack up their belongings and leave the land that is Israel. So, I find it hard to believe that such a thing could be carried out without at least some level of genocide occurring during the process. And I'd add that, because of this reality, Ahmadinejad's desire to "drive the Israelis into the sea" seems to me to be an extremist viewpoint.]

Last edited by baloney_detector; 09-15-2007 at 01:22 PM.
Old 09-15-2007, 01:17 PM   #40 (permalink)
Citizen
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Country:
Points: 650, Level: 12
Points: 650, Level: 12 Points: 650, Level: 12 Points: 650, Level: 12
Level up: 50%, 50 Points needed
Level up: 50% Level up: 50% Level up: 50%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
redwolfcolt is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by baloney_detector View Post
My prediction:

By the end of the second quarter of 2008, the US and several of her allies will be in open warfare with Iran.

Unlike Iraq, this war won't be an invasion of Iran, but rather, it will consist of a naval engagement and naval blockade of Iran and a series of air strikes against key Iranian defensive-oriented military bases and, of course, Iran's nuclear facilities.

Also targeted will be Iran's political regime and structure in an effort to help topple the Iranian regime.

And, between now and when the military campaign begins, there will be an ever-increasing effort on the world's stage (the UN) by the US and her allies to force Iran to rethink and change its actions concerning her nuclear program and her activities in the Middle East...which will bear no fruit, so to speak.

Also, the US and her allies will exhibit an ever-increasing effort to try their best to convince the Iranian people that regime change is in their power and that the world will be behind them in their effort to change the Iranian political structure and government...which will also bear no fruit, so to speak, at least not until the open war begins.


Just a "heads up"...

(I could be wrong with this prediction, of course. But everything I've read about the international situation with Iran and the Iranian regime's history-and I've read an aweful lot on these topics over the past five years or so-points to this outcome.)
I agree!
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites