| ||||||
| Global Politics Debate US and International politics here. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Council Member ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Gender: ![]() Posts: 1,225 Country: ![]()
| Quote:
So, the US has no leverage in any "talks" with Iran...no matter if the US talks with them directly or through a third party. And I don't think you fully understand the nature of the Iranian regime as a whole. They want to dominate the Middle East and turn it into one big theocratic and totalitarian state. And they want the end of all American and Western influence wherever Muslims live in this world. And they want the end of Israel. But, none of these things are things that the US can offer them. And, any "carrots" the US offers them isn't going to stop them from trying to achieve these goals. And this is how its been for the past 28 years, no matter what the US has already offered and given to them during that time. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsored Links |
| | #32 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Partisan Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles Gender: ![]() Posts: 10,695 Country: ![]()
| Quote:
Don't forget it was the Russians and Britain, supported by the US, who interfered in the internal affairs of Iran when they installed the Shah in 1941 and forced the abdication of his father. And when the Shah was overthrown in 1979, the US gave him shelter, which provoked the hostage crisis. Then the US backed Saddam and helped kill thousands of Iranians during the Iran-Iraq war. The very thing we criticise Iran for currently. I recommend you watch the MSNBC or 60 minutes interview with Ahmadinejad where he explains some of the Iranian attitude to Israel, basically: -the attacks on the Jews in WW2 were a European problem, so why give them a piece of land in the Middle East that belonged to Palestine? It would make more sense to form Israel in Bavaria or Idaho - when he talks about "driving the Israelis into the sea" he means driving them out of Israel and restoring the land to Palestine, not necessarily about genocide -when the US warns Iran and other foreign fighters to stay out of Iraq, Iran repeats the same line back at the US I'm not trying to pretend they are right, only that they have a point of view that we never ever consider. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=http:...?v=ykd-syzZ4ZY Doggone it darn right you betcha bless your heart maverick | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | #33 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Council Member ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 1,270
| Gary, you are correct. The US has a very two-sided attitude in the Middle East. This is why we can, and never will; be able to help peace along there. First of all, Do we honestly care about any of these countries? Realistically, outside of the oil in the Middle East- we don't. We have a large Jewish population here in America, so we prance about talking about wanting peace; but we just want the OIL. It's as simple as that. Gary, you are also correct in what was said about America helping Saddam during the Iran-Iraq war. Wasn't this the same Saddam that we wanted toppled; and the reason our troops are still in Iraq? People, this two-sided attitude will never get us anywhere- especially the Middle East. We must choose one view or the other. I agree that we must not allow the Isrealis to be left to the whims of the admitted hatred for them from the Arab nations there; but we must not think we can dictate policy the world over. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | #34 (permalink) | ||
| Beer Man Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: stuck in the middle Posts: 3,410 Country: ![]() Thanks: 99
Thanked 270 Times in 156 Posts
| Quote:
Did you take the quiz? I got all 5 correct "We could not now take time for further search or consideration, our victuals being much spent, especially our beer." - William Bradford Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right..... Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.! | ||
| | #35 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Community Leader ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 736 Country: ![]()
| Yes, I took the quiz (got 3 out of 5) - never read the book. One of them I got wrong was: If a mouse washes all your floors. . . I said that he'll charge you for it. The correct answer is - he'll want to take a nap. How much sense does that make??? I mean, wouldn't the mouse want to get paid?? | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | #36 (permalink) | |
| Beer Man Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: stuck in the middle Posts: 3,410 Country: ![]() Thanks: 99
Thanked 270 Times in 156 Posts
| I think kids understand the need to take a nap better than wanting to get paid. "We could not now take time for further search or consideration, our victuals being much spent, especially our beer." - William Bradford Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right..... Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.! Last edited by onthefence; 09-15-2007 at 12:43 AM. | |
| | #37 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Community Leader ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 736 Country: ![]()
| | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | #38 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Council Member ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 1,270
| | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | #39 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Council Member ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Gender: ![]() Posts: 1,225 Country: ![]()
| Quote:
And I think I'm fairly aware of the Iranian regime's viewpoint. So, what you said regarding Iran isn't news to me. But, considering the observation that Iran is essentially a totalitarian state with a regime that actively acts toward achieving their lofty goal of conquering the Muslim world (in their own subversive way) and engulfing it in their theofascist form of governance, and given the observation that the Iranian regime seeks to essentially eliminate Western secularism, democracy, and capitalism from the world's stage, what outcome do you wish to see for the Middle East...and the World? Perhaps it would be best if all states always acted in ways that always promotes the sovereignty of all other states and their interests and good will among all nations. But, this isn't the way the world works. All nations, in fact, act to protect, by military means if necessary, their own interests...even at the expense of some other nation's sovereignty and self-interests. And, practical matters will eventually force almost all people to choose sides because they will realize that their ideals can only be achieved one battle at a time and because compromises will have to be made of their ideals along the way. So, which would you prefer; 1) The continuation and spread of the secular, democratic, and capitalistic mindset the Western world has so far successfully embarked upon as a model for the world? Or, 2) The abdication of that possible "ideal" future world state and the return of fascism to the world's stage...albeit with a theocratic propensity? (Don't get me wrong. The world aught to be a fair place. But I'm a realist at heart, rather than an idealist. This, of course, doesn't excuse wrongs that are done by the US...or any other state. But, again, people will eventually have to take sides...myself included.) [I'm curious, how exactly could Israel suddenly cease to exist without the very really potential for genocide? I mean, Israelis aren't going to simply pack up their belongings and leave the land that is Israel. So, I find it hard to believe that such a thing could be carried out without at least some level of genocide occurring during the process. And I'd add that, because of this reality, Ahmadinejad's desire to "drive the Israelis into the sea" seems to me to be an extremist viewpoint.] Last edited by baloney_detector; 09-15-2007 at 01:22 PM. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | #40 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citizen ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 16 Country: ![]()
| Quote:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 AM.

















Linear Mode