Women To Be Farmed In The Future?

HumanBeast · 01-09-2008, 03:40 PM

In the not so distant future, women may be "farmed" for the purposes of pleasing men, according to Angry Harry, a men's right activist.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AngryHarry

if anything, the chances are not so much that women will take over the planet and exterminate the men, but that men will start to 'farm' women for their very own purposes - just like they currently do with cows.
And, quite frankly, unless women in the west get their act together and start supporting men rather than making enemies out of them by supporting divisive feminists who do little more than continually stir up hatred toward them, and who, therefore, also undermine the whole well-being of their very own societies, then they shall surely deserve to be tamed, domesticated and harvested for the good of the planet, and, of course, for the contentment and happiness of the men who dwell upon it!

Source: Kirsty Wark Glows

His reasoning?

Quote:

Originally Posted by AngryHarry

Listen carefully. Basically, women were designed by Nature to taste good to men when they are hungry; and that, fundamentally, is the end of the matter. The Universe does not seem to have figured out any other long term purpose for them. And even the ancients clearly recognised this by emphasising the important bits of women in their sculptures...
Realistically, women have only got one hope when it comes to having a happy future. They will have to taste good to men. And if they do not do this, then they are toast; because they will have nothing else to offer.
The converse, however, is not true. Men do not have to taste good to women to be of value to them. Without men - nothing. No houses or factories would be built or maintained. No roads would be constructed.
It is men who create, construct, develop, operate and maintain just about everything that represents the progress of humans on this planet.
This all suggests that women are going to have to behave more like women than like men, or they will find themselves heading for a fall.

Source: Are Women Becoming Redundant?

So I guess women will have to act like Barbie again? Or if men want to live like the monks, they will just engineer artifical wombs and women will go extinct. I don't have an opinion on this, it just scares me.

waitingtables · 01-09-2008, 05:17 PM

That is the most ridiculous crap I've heard. Has anyone here read, "The Handmaid's Tale"? That I could worry about. But I think if the men were the physically weaker of the sexes, women would have found a way to build things and farm (which was done by women as much, if not more then men) and the like with no problem. As a matter of fact if you look back into some ancient cultures, women did many of these things in matriarchal societies. And they even trained warriors, who weren't considered to be warriors without the training of the sacred woman teacher. Please, women have done everything men have without a problem.

I would love to email the guy who wrote the redundant article. What an ass. I couldn't find an email address. Does he expect to get empathy with the "I've been oppressed for three decades by feminists crap? Does he realise how long women have been oppressed by men? And that there is a huge difference in the oppression he describes versus the rape, torture, beatings, and whatever other horrible torments you can imagine, that women have been subjected to and are still being subjected to in some places? Oh boo hoo, your life is hard... Please

tristanrobin · 01-09-2008, 05:29 PM

I think those must have been published in The Onion.

They can't be taken seriously.

Grace · 01-30-2008, 09:09 AM

What do you expect?? You talking to a guy name angryharry, lol

HumanBeast · 02-04-2008, 12:29 PM

His e-mail address is harrysnews@gmail.com.

OnTheLeft · 02-05-2008, 05:44 PM

This has got to be some bizarre satire.

Wtf ails some people?

HumanBeast · 02-11-2008, 12:41 PM

No he is dead serious. If he hates women so much then he should create a man only town or join a monestary.

garysher · 02-11-2008, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HumanBeast

No he is dead serious. If he hates women so much then he should create a man only town or join a monestary.

New Haven, CT is close to being a man-only town, perhaps he should move there.

garysher · 02-11-2008, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by waitingtables

That is the most ridiculous crap I've heard. Has anyone here read, "The Handmaid's Tale"? That I could worry about. But I think if the men were the physically weaker of the sexes, women would have found a way to build things and farm (which was done by women as much, if not more then men) and the like with no problem. As a matter of fact if you look back into some ancient cultures, women did many of these things in matriarchal societies. And they even trained warriors, who weren't considered to be warriors without the training of the sacred woman teacher. Please, women have done everything men have without a problem.

I would love to email the guy who wrote the redundant article. What an ass. I couldn't find an email address. Does he expect to get empathy with the "I've been oppressed for three decades by feminists crap? Does he realise how long women have been oppressed by men? And that there is a huge difference in the oppression he describes versus the rape, torture, beatings, and whatever other horrible torments you can imagine, that women have been subjected to and are still being subjected to in some places? Oh boo hoo, your life is hard... Please

The Handmaid's Tale is entirely fictitious (like the article at the start of this thread) and was authored by a woman.

Of course if a man had written a similar novel about men the book would probably have been banned!

waitingtables · 02-12-2008, 07:54 AM

No Gary, really? I know it's fictitous and written by a woman. What has that got to do with anything? You miss the point of most everything I post, or you choose to anyway. So, have you actually read the book or not? Do you have anything meaningful to say about the subject matter?