Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Global Politics

Global Politics Debate US and International politics here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-07-2006, 12:48 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
For cripes sake man. You asked me and I told you. Are you ever happy?
Actually, I was very happy about your response.

It gave me the opportunity to give a succinct reply and not have yet another thread drone on and on and on...

Your reply proved my point.
Why wouldn't that make me happy?
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Sponsored Links
Old 06-07-2006, 12:50 PM   #12 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
Actually, I was very happy about your response.

It gave me the opportunity to give a succinct reply and not have yet another thread drone on and on and on...

Your reply proved my point.
Why wouldn't that make me happy?
Kinda hard to tell if your happy with your little devil face glaring at me at the end of your message.
Old 06-07-2006, 04:12 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
This is a different subject than Clinton and Kosovo, but entirely related to Republican hypocrisy, so I'll post it here anyways...


In 1992, the United States Secretary of Defense during the (Gulf) war, Dick Cheney, made the same point:
I would guess if we had gone in there, I would still have forces in Baghdad today. We'd be running the country. We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home.

And the final point that I think needs to be made is this question of casualties. I don't think you could have done all of that without significant additional U.S. casualties, and while everybody was tremendously impressed with the low cost of the (1991) conflict, for the 146 Americans who were killed in action and for their families, it wasn't a cheap war.

And the question in my mind is, how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is, not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the President made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq.[15]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 06-07-2006, 05:07 PM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
This is a different subject than Clinton and Kosovo, but entirely related to Republican hypocrisy, so I'll post it here anyways...


In 1992, the United States Secretary of Defense during the (Gulf) war, Dick Cheney, made the same point:
I would guess if we had gone in there, I would still have forces in Baghdad today. We'd be running the country. We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home.

And the final point that I think needs to be made is this question of casualties. I don't think you could have done all of that without significant additional U.S. casualties, and while everybody was tremendously impressed with the low cost of the (1991) conflict, for the 146 Americans who were killed in action and for their families, it wasn't a cheap war.

And the question in my mind is, how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is, not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the President made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq.[15]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War

He's right. 2500 casualties so far is pretty low for an invasion of a country and takeover. 3 years of war and 2500 casualities? Very very low. How many died in Viet Nam during 3 years of war. How many died in Korea after 3 years of war. WWII? WWII. He's right.
Old 06-07-2006, 05:09 PM   #15 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,854
Country:
Points: 28,263, Level: 98
Points: 28,263, Level: 98 Points: 28,263, Level: 98 Points: 28,263, Level: 98
Level up: 92%, 87 Points needed
Level up: 92% Level up: 92% Level up: 92%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
He's right. 2500 casualties so far is pretty low for an invasion of a country and takeover. 3 years of war and 2500 casualities? Very very low. How many died in Viet Nam during 3 years of war. How many died in Korea after 3 years of war. WWII? WWII. He's right.
We are just saving more people than before because of medical advancement. Nearly 20,000 troops have been injured, often in life altering ways.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 06-07-2006, 05:21 PM   #16 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
He's right. 2500 casualties so far is pretty low for an invasion of a country and takeover. 3 years of war and 2500 casualities? Very very low. How many died in Viet Nam during 3 years of war. How many died in Korea after 3 years of war. WWII? WWII. He's right.
You say "He's right"...
Do you even comprehend what he was saying in the first place???

Let me repeat it for you...

"And the question in my mind is, how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is, not that damned many."

He's saying that Saddam Hussein IS NOT WORTH "that damned many" more American casualties.

If I'm going to buy a car for $X amount of money, and the dealer asks me how many more dollars I think a CD player added would be worth, and I say "not that damned many", I am establishing that the CD player is not worth much more money...

Certainly not SEVENTEEN TIMES the $X price-tag.
Because that 2,500 you talk about is SEVENTEEN TIMES more deaths than the 146 deaths he was talking about there.

Do you think increasing the amount of deaths by 1600% would be acceptable to "him" considering how he spoke here???
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 06-07-2006, 11:05 PM   #17 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
You say "He's right"...
Do you even comprehend what he was saying in the first place???

Let me repeat it for you...

"And the question in my mind is, how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is, not that damned many."

He's saying that Saddam Hussein IS NOT WORTH "that damned many" more American casualties.

If I'm going to buy a car for $X amount of money, and the dealer asks me how many more dollars I think a CD player added would be worth, and I say "not that damned many", I am establishing that the CD player is not worth much more money...

Certainly not SEVENTEEN TIMES the $X price-tag.
Because that 2,500 you talk about is SEVENTEEN TIMES more deaths than the 146 deaths he was talking about there.

Do you think increasing the amount of deaths by 1600% would be acceptable to "him" considering how he spoke here???
Why don't you ask him? His statement came before 09/11 and the war on terror began. Like they say, 09/11 changed everything. Obviously, he did change his mind. Dems change their mind all the time. Kerry changed his mind every day during the campaign, why can't Cheney change his mind afte r09/11?
Old 06-07-2006, 11:28 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
Why don't you ask him? His statement came before 09/11 and the war on terror began. Like they say, 09/11 changed everything.
Ahh yes. Blind adherance to pithy catch phrases, without any regards to a potential for intelligence...

Iraq didn't attack us on 9/11.
Hussein didn't attack us on 9/11.

The only thing that "changed" is that some people were more easily fooled because they were more scared...


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
Obviously, he did change his mind. Dems change their mind all the time. Kerry changed his mind every day during the campaign, why can't Cheney change his mind afte r09/11?
What changed in the CIRCUMSTANCES OF IRAQ after 9/11?

Like many Republicans, you're using the excuse of AL QAEDA to attack a group that IS NOT al qaeda...
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 06-07-2006, 11:33 PM   #19 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
Ahh yes. Blind adherance to pithy catch phrases, without any regards to a potential for intelligence...

Iraq didn't attack us on 9/11.
Hussein didn't attack us on 9/11.

The only thing that "changed" is that some people were more easily fooled because they were more scared...



What changed in the CIRCUMSTANCES OF IRAQ after 9/11?

Like many Republicans, you're using the excuse of AL QAEDA to attack a group that IS NOT al qaeda...

Blind adherance to pithy catch phrases, without any regards to a potential for intelligence...

09/11 did change everything. I heard the president say it was a war on terror.

Saddam was supporting terrorism and funding it and scamming with the oil for food program? Removing Saddam makes tactical sense. Now you have Iran right in the middle of 2 democratic nations, Afghanistan and Iraq. Is it any wonder they are squealing? Saddam was a bad guy. You know that. He never signed a peace treaty, only agreed to a cease fire which he violated day after day for years. Give me a break man. I thought you were more intelligent than that.
Old 06-08-2006, 06:46 AM   #20 (permalink)
Council Member
 
hkbajwa's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pakistan
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,179
Points: 5,047, Level: 45
Points: 5,047, Level: 45 Points: 5,047, Level: 45 Points: 5,047, Level: 45
Level up: 49%, 103 Points needed
Level up: 49% Level up: 49% Level up: 49%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hkbajwa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
Blind adherance to pithy catch phrases, without any regards to a potential for intelligence...

09/11 did change everything. I heard the president say it was a war on terror.

Saddam was supporting terrorism and funding it and scamming with the oil for food program? Removing Saddam makes tactical sense. Now you have Iran right in the middle of 2 democratic nations, Afghanistan and Iraq. Is it any wonder they are squealing? Saddam was a bad guy. You know that. He never signed a peace treaty, only agreed to a cease fire which he violated day after day for years. Give me a break man. I thought you were more intelligent than that.
Dude if you think afghanistan and iraq are anywhere close to democracy you are majorly off course.

In fact the Iraq invasion has STRENGTHENED Iran for the following reasons:

1) Iran now has FAR more influence in Iraq. Prior to the US invasion, Iran could do nothing inthe area. Now because of the Shiite majority, the ayatollah gives an order, and it's immediately followed by the iraqis.

2) Iran now no longer has to worry about fighting Iraq. There is so much internal strife int he country, that there is no way Iraq poses a military threat any more.

3) As a result of an ill-conceived invasion plan, the US forces are stretched thin at the moment. Even if the US wanted to INVADE iran, they would not be able to. How can any country carry on 3 simultaneous wars with 3 different nations?

4) The Iraq war has pushed up the price of oil in the world, which indirectly increases the income of Iran, which gains a LOT from higher oil prices.

5) Iran is in no way boxed in by anybody. While the US may feel that the Iraqis and Aghanis are their allies, i can guarantee that public opinion in the two countries is definately in FAVOUR of iran. I can bet you anything that the populations ( as opposed to the puppet regimes) of these two countries would side with IRan in a SECOND if it came down to a choice.

6) Due to general antipathy towards the US as a result of skewed foreign policy, most other nations in the world would rather support Iran than the US. Not because there is any great love for Ahmedinejad. But because no other country can feel safe from invasion. I mean US foreign policy is not exactly consistent ( depose dictator of Iraq while supporting dictator of Saudi Arabia ). This is not a matter of hating the US. this is a matter of self preservation of sovreignty. If the US can decide to invade whenever it feels like it, how can any nation be sure it's not next. I know that there are serious fears in Pakistan that the US will invade us before long.

Anyhow this is how it looks to me. But maybe that's cuz i'm one of those evil muslims... who knows
Love for all, Hatred for none
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites