Defending the Truth

You really are a pathetic debater. You didn't even know Saddam was violating the cease fire for years. He was also violating the UN sanctions for years. I suppose you're going to deny that also? That's pathetic. How can I discuss the Iraq war with you when you don't even know the facts. Give it up man, you are rally making a fool of yourself today.

Actually, I did know that.
I then asked you the LAST TIME he tried something like that.

And you couldn't answer me, could you...
You keep claiming that I don't know stuff when you have no clue what I know...


WHICH UN Sanctions and WHEN was he violating them...
There's a point to these questions, and you haven't a clue as to what it is, do you.

Instead, you just assume me asking these questions means I don't know...
That's funny!

Bullshit. First you said the US broke the cease fire. Now you are asking which UN sanctions he broke. My God man, read a newspaper. Let's start with the oil for food scam. Go research that. Pathetic.

They did.
Did the U.N. authorize hostilities to re-commence?
Simple question. Yes or no...


No, you dishonest twit.
I'm asking WHEN he broke WHICH sanctions...

I'm asking you to be SPECIFIC in your claims and PROVE them.


The old "go read it for yourself" routine.
I've seen many a poster cop-out with that one. Usually means they haven't a clue...

He broke the UN cease fire every time he fired on one of our planes after the cease fire. You do remember those indicents don't you? If you don't, read a book or ask your mommy.

And once again, you ignore EVERY argument I just made in order to rant on about a distraction.

WHEN did this occur?
WHEN did we invade?
WHAT was he ACTUALLY doing at the time of our invasion that justified MANY billion dollars, committing our troops to even a questionable end date, sacrificing thousands of troop lives...

THAT is the point.
It wasn't worth it.

Why do I have to keep re-explaining these things to you?

You asked me when he violated the cease fire and I told you. That has nothing to do with the invasion. In my opinion, the invasion is justified. In you opinion, it is not. Let history be the judge. You're beating a dead horse.

So Saddam violating the cease fire is not a justification for the invasion?
Then why the heck are you bringing it up?


And if current "history" is something to consider, this war and how it is being handled is being judged "poorly" by the masses.
It's not just my opinion, but the opinion of a majority...

Are you mentally ill? You asked when Saddam violated the cease fire you ignorant twit. Almost 6 out of 10 people disagree with the war in Iraq. So? Thankfully our foreign policy is not dictated by polls, but by elected officials.

Yes. Because YOU started in about him violating it...
I asked a question about something YOU brought up first.
And now you say that the cease fire has nothing to do with the invasion?

Seriously. This isn't an insult. Do you have Alzheimer's?
I've been asking more out of a concern that I should have a different approach to these discussions if you have a mental impairment on memory.


ROFLMAO!
When it comes to gay marriage, THAT should be decided by the people. An issue of minority rights should be decided by the masses.

But when it comes to an ACTUAL WAR where innocent civilians die and American soldiers die, costing American taxpayers BILLIONS of dollars, THAT is up to the officials???

Can you smell the H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-S-Y???