Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Global Politics

Global Politics Debate US and International politics here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2006, 04:33 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,758
Country:
Points: 15,236, Level: 79
Points: 15,236, Level: 79 Points: 15,236, Level: 79 Points: 15,236, Level: 79
Level up: 78%, 114 Points needed
Level up: 78% Level up: 78% Level up: 78%
Activity: 4%
Activity: 4% Activity: 4% Activity: 4%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
Strange, but for some odd reason I can't find a clause in the American Constitution saying what you just said explaining why kids in school can't wear crosses or pictures of Jesus because it favors one religion over another. That must be what some people in black robes dreamed up. I think it's a bogus reason. According to what I read in the constitution, it says "CONGRESS cannot prohibit the free exercise thereof". But I guess the supreme court can if they say so which is bogus in my humble opinion.

Would it be okay for you if a muslim girl wore a scarf over her face in school?
How could you possibly be so thick? Are you just in actuality mentally retarded or do you just not read my posts? Please tell me, because if you're mentally retarded then I understand perfectly and its not your fault. PLEASE, I can't debate with people who disregard what other people actually say.

It might help to notice that I never attempted to justify "why kids can't wear religious shirts". In fact, I had defended their rights to wear such things. But of coarse you don't see that because "liberals defending Christianity" is just not possible! I seriously think you just hear what you want to, alias. You would also notice that I stated that it is only wrong if the school, meaning the state, sponsered putting up religious pictures and symbols on school property. That would be a violation of the seperation of church and state. A child may wear religious clothing as much as they want if it does not violate the dress code. Which, the Supreme Court has given schools the right to impose such dress codes if it is imparative to the functionality and behavior of the school. Now in these examples that you gave, by all means file it to the courts if the banning of such things isn't imparative to the functionality of the schools. I like how you assume that I'm this godless commie that wants to abolish Christianity. You couldn't be more wrong.

And even so, what are you and Jefferson getting at here? What does it matter? How does this in any way, justify the blatant violation of this veteran's right to free speech?
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Sponsored Links
Old 07-06-2006, 04:57 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky
And even so, what are you and Jefferson getting at here? What does it matter? How does this in any way, justify the blatant violation of this veteran's right to free speech?
It's the old diverting attention routine.

Take a look at a variety of the threads that alias posts on.
He typically takes the topic away from its ORIGINAL focus and turns it around to something completely unrelated whenever he feels he can't address the points raised...
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 07-06-2006, 05:09 PM   #23 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
thenewnoise's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where Snoop Dogg is from, CA
Posts: 657
Points: 4,321, Level: 41
Points: 4,321, Level: 41 Points: 4,321, Level: 41 Points: 4,321, Level: 41
Level up: 86%, 29 Points needed
Level up: 86% Level up: 86% Level up: 86%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to thenewnoise
thenewnoise is offline
Reply With Quote
 
When I was in High School many kids wore shirts that said "I love Jesus" or something similar. I was also the president of the bible club and we held events on campus all the time. I can personally say that in liberal california, I have known no one who has been punished by any school for expressing their christian belief. Please note that I am not claiming that it has never happened, just stating my personal experience.
When the president talks to God
Do they drink near beer and go play golf
While they pick which countries to invade
Which Muslim souls still can be saved?
I guess god just calls a spade a spade
When the president talks to God
Old 07-06-2006, 06:21 PM   #24 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
The dress code is regarding JEWELRY.
"...the uniform dress code stipulates that no jewellery is to be worn, other than a small pair of ear studs."

I'ld be curious as to how the "kara bracelets" don't qualify, and to that end you would probably have a legitimate gripe.

But to me, the solution is simple.
Put the symbol on a scarf or a bracelet and the situation is solved.

The discrimination is against JEWELRY here.
It seems that not only is there a "race card", but also a "religion card" by which Christians claim unrelated issues are based on religious discrimination...
You said show me an example and I did. Why is the Sikh girl allowed to wear jewelry and the Christian isn't if it's about jewelry?
Old 07-07-2006, 12:47 PM   #25 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
He could have been there visiting a friend.
He could have been there because other vets go there to socialize over a "cup of coffee".

There are a variety of reasons why this guy could have been there. And NONE of them are relevant.

Are you saying that he needed to have an appointment at the clinic in order to have freedom of speech???
Actually, ALL of the possible reasons he was there are COMPLETELY relevant!

IT IS MY OPINION (note that) that this guy went there for the EXPRESS PURPOSE of provoking some sort of reaction. In fact, it is my opinion that he walked around, sat around and did whatever was necessary - for as long as necessary - to provoke a reaction. Why? HE WANTED A STORY!

In the VA hospitals I've been to, you see people dressed in any and every kind of attire. Some are hippies with their tie-dyed shirts, etc. It's not a problem.

Personally, I believe this guy - the writer of the original article - is chock full of crap, and being completely dishonest.



...and by the way, if you were at all familiar with hospitals, you would know that people are NOT allowed to go there and just hang around all day. People are no longer allowed to just meander from place to place, room to room, etc. in hospitals - especially VA hospitals. It's partly due to the new HIPA Laws.

If a person is deemed a nuisance, they WILL eventually be removed from a hospital.

Last edited by Jefferson; 07-07-2006 at 12:50 PM.
Old 07-07-2006, 05:07 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,758
Country:
Points: 15,236, Level: 79
Points: 15,236, Level: 79 Points: 15,236, Level: 79 Points: 15,236, Level: 79
Level up: 78%, 114 Points needed
Level up: 78% Level up: 78% Level up: 78%
Activity: 4%
Activity: 4% Activity: 4% Activity: 4%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Even if he was there all day and they had reserved the right to kick him out; that doesn't leave any excuse for arresting the man. I find it ironic that with all of Jefferson's and Alias' ranting about honoring our troops and veterans, they would be so quick as to call a war veteran a liar, simply because he is for peace. It seems as if they only back the troops that agree with their political views: figures. I bet if this man wore a Jesus shirt and they arrested him, Jefferson and Alias would be up in arms.

I saw an interview of this man on Democracy Now, an independent news show. By all means this man was truthful.

Again, my point which I have expressed still stands. When faced with something that puts their preconcieved notions to shame, its a "lie", or "the source isn't reliable." They'll complain when a liberal links to an editorial or a blog: but they're more than happy to quote them if they're conservative. Any blog is just as unreliable whether its conservative or liberal.

I mean, seriously, Jefferson, you have nothing to hide! Why don't you stand up for our freedoms and our rights when they are being blatently violated? Why do you not protest when our veterans are treated like trash, and our veterans are denied the rights which they have put their lives on the line to protect? Why arn't you up in arms when our government signs away our rights and privacy in the name of "security"? Here I thought conservatives were supposed to be for small government.
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72

Last edited by Katczinsky; 07-07-2006 at 05:09 PM.
Old 07-07-2006, 05:10 PM   #27 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky
Even if he was there all day and they had reserved the right to kick him out; that doesn't leave any excuse for arresting the man. I find it ironic that with all of Jefferson's and Alias' ranting about honoring our troops and veterans, they would be so quick as to call a war veteran a liar, simply because he is for peace. It seems as if they only back the troops that agree with their political views: figures. I bet if this man wore a Jesus shirt and they arrested him, Jefferson and Alias would be up in arms.

I saw an interview of this man on Democracy Now, an independent news show. By all means this man was truthful.

Again, my point which I have expressed still stands. When faced with something that puts their preconcieved notions to shame, its a "lie", or "the source isn't reliable." They'll complain when a liberal links to an editorial or a blog: but they're more than happy to quote them if they're conservative. Any blog is just as unreliable whether its conservative or liberal.

I mean, seriously, Jefferson, you have nothing to hide! Why don't you stand up for our freedoms and our rights when they are being blatently violated? Why do you not protest when our veterans are treated like trash, and our troops are denied the rights which they have put their lives on the line to protect? Why arn't you up in arms when our government signs away our rights and privacy in the name of "security"? Here I thought conservatives were supposed to be for small government.
So you saw the guy on a show - the blatantly biased "democracynow" - and he said he was honest, so he's honest.

Yep. Uhh Huhh. And I've got some bridges I'd like to sell you.



I am NOT supporting the guy being arrested.

I AM QUESTIONING THE MAN'S STORY. I THINK HE'S A LIAR, AND THAT THIS WHOLE THING WAS A CHEAP SET-UP.


Can you wrap your little mind around that concept?
Old 07-07-2006, 05:17 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,758
Country:
Points: 15,236, Level: 79
Points: 15,236, Level: 79 Points: 15,236, Level: 79 Points: 15,236, Level: 79
Level up: 78%, 114 Points needed
Level up: 78% Level up: 78% Level up: 78%
Activity: 4%
Activity: 4% Activity: 4% Activity: 4%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Can you wrap your little mind around that concept?
Oh I understand your point perfectly. Always trust our brave fighting men and women....unless they're liberals.
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 07-07-2006, 05:55 PM   #29 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
Actually, ALL of the possible reasons he was there are COMPLETELY relevant!

IT IS MY OPINION (note that) that this guy went there for the EXPRESS PURPOSE of provoking some sort of reaction. In fact, it is my opinion that he walked around, sat around and did whatever was necessary - for as long as necessary - to provoke a reaction. Why? HE WANTED A STORY!

In the VA hospitals I've been to, you see people dressed in any and every kind of attire. Some are hippies with their tie-dyed shirts, etc. It's not a problem.
So people can get in with all sorts of attire, but if their MOTIVES for wearing something is deemed undesirable, THEN they can be harassed and made to leave?

Talk about THOUGHT POLICE...

People have a freedom of expression. I can understand how it can be curbed in some cases where the people involved are ACTUALLY CREATING a nuisance and disturbing things, but this guy WAS NOT disturbing anything.
There was NO PROBLEM until the police made it a problem.

And if you don't see how that is a problem, then you're just plain blind.
With your type of rationale, why don't we just start claiming that people who wear Jesus jewelry are trying to create a nuisance? And hey! If they refuse a simple request to place the jewelry inside their clothing, then they are making it clear that the purpose IS TO PROVOKE...
Maybe we should start arresting them as well, eh???
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 07-07-2006, 07:01 PM   #30 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Dylan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,808
Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Level up: 37%, 126 Points needed
Level up: 37% Level up: 37% Level up: 37%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Dylan is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Wow, poor guy. I hope he wins his court case.
My political compass
Economic Left/Right: 5.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.41
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites