Oh wow, I think someone's mind skipped maturity.

When you take sides, you're one of the asswhipes. Mind your own fucking business. If I want to say faggot, I'll say faggot. This aint your fucking pusilanimous teacher in public school, this is the real world. Grow up.

Yeah, your mother. Look at what she raised.

Here they come boys. This is exactly what happens at every site when they have finally had enough and you finally get to them. The same exact tactics. Go ahead. I'm gonna have me some fun with you gutter snipes.

So you've pulled this crap on other web-sites before?
Why am I not surprised.

Alias, you aren't "getting" to anybody. All you're doing is escalating things with profanity and really stupid insults that most people outgrew in the 6th grade.

You can "have fun" if you like, but don't delude yourself into thinking that you're "getting" to anybody here. To "get" to somebody you first have to give a damn about what the other person thinks, or think their comments have some merit.
You fail on both accounts.

So if profane trash talk is what you want to devolve in, that's your choice.
Just please realize that there is no age requirement to access this web-site, and kids can see your profanity just like the rest of us can.
Try to be more adult about this...

Likewise pal. YOU are the one who starts this crap with your calling me stupid, ignorant, etc. YOU are the one that has the choice to stop it, not me. I am giving back what you give. It's entirely up to you. If you get frustrated so easily, then may I suggest a new hobby like knitting or bridge.

This is the tactic you asswipes use. You can't win the argument so you start personal attacks. You call people crazy, on drugs, stupid, ignorant, they have Alzheimers, brainwashed, etc. We see it time after time. Examples are everywhere on the net. You think you're the chosen and anyone who doesn't grab hold of you "progressive" ideas must be stupid.

Grow up or ignore me. The choice is yours because every time you start it, I am going to jump on you likewise and EVERYONE else who jumps in.

No. You're not.
If I say something is "ignorant", and then you respond with "f___ing f_ggot", that is two ENTIRELY separate degrees.
If you called something I said "stupid" in response, THAT would be the same.

Using the "f-word" is profanity, and YOU are the one doing that. NOT me.


There is no frustration here.
I just care a little bit more about younger eyes which may read your profanity.
That's all.
Obviously, you don't....


Who is this "we" alias?
Because it is YOU who are doing the lying about what people are saying.
YOU lie and claim people support slavery.
YOU lie and claim they said one thing when they said something else entirely different.
YOU can't remember what people said five minutes ago.

Can you show me ANYBODY else on this board who has had their memory retention problems pointed out?


I am amazed that you think the "choice is mine".
Like I am somehow responsible for how YOU CHOOSE to act.
Brilliantly immature...

There it is again...."brilliantly immature". You don't get it do you?

Your choice. You make it.

Let me explain this to you one more time. If you think something I say is a lie, then prove it is a lie or shut the fuck up about it and move on. Calling me immature, stupid, ignorant, etc is only going to get it right back in your face.

The Left, Online and Outraged
Liberal Blogger Finds an Outlet and a Community

By David Finkel
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, April 15, 2006; Page A01

SHERMAN OAKS, Calif. -- In the angry life of Maryscott O'Connor, the rage begins as soon as she opens her eyes and realizes that her president is still George W. Bush. The sun has yet to rise and her family is asleep, but no matter; as soon as the realization kicks in, O'Connor, 37, is out of bed and heading toward her computer.

Out there, awaiting her building fury: the Angry Left, where O'Connor's reputation is as one of the angriest of all. "One long, sustained scream" is how she describes the writing she does for various Web logs, as she wonders what she should scream about this day.

She smokes a cigarette. Should it be about Bush, whom she considers "malevolent," a "sociopath" and "the Antichrist"? She smokes another cigarette. Should it be about Vice President Cheney, whom she thinks of as "Satan," or about Karl Rove, "the devil"? Should it be about the "evil" Republican Party, or the "weaselly, capitulating, self-aggrandizing, self-serving" Democrats, or the Catholic Church, for which she says "I have a special place in my heart . . . a burning, sizzling, putrescent place where the guilty suffer the tortures of the damned"?

Darfur, she finally decides. She will write about Darfur. The shame of it. The culpability of all Americans, including herself, for doing nothing. She will write something so filled with outrage that it will accomplish the one thing above all she wants from her anger: to have an effect.

"Darfur is not hopeless," she begins typing, and pauses.

"Ugh," she says.

"You are not helpless," she continues typing, and pauses again.

"Weak."

She deletes everything and starts over.

"WAKE THE [expletive] UP," she writes next, and this time, instead of pausing, she keeps going, typing harder and harder on a keyboard that is surrounded by a pack of cigarettes, a dirty ashtray, a can of nonalcoholic beer, an album with photos of her dead father and a taped-up note -- staring at her -- on which she has scrawled "Why am I/you here?"

Outspoken and Uncensored

These are mean times.

"I just want to see these [expletive] swinging from their heels in the public square," reads a recent comment from someone named Dave in a discussion about the Bush administration on a Web site called Eschaton.

http://tinyurl.com/fm8c3

You all really need to calm down. Be sure and enlarge that gal's picture and take a good look at her. The unhinged left.

And more hate and filth from the left.....

A Proud Member of the Toddler-Threatening Community
It was disgusting a year ago when Daily Kos posters were all for attacking the sexual orientation of four-year-old Jack Roberts, the son of then Supreme Court nominee (and now Chief Justice) John Roberts. I thought it was disgusting, abhorrent behavior by deranged individuals, and I thought I'd seen the lowest of the low.

Then came University of Arizona psychology professor Deborah Frisch.

Deb Frisch is living proof of my tagline, that "liberalism is a persistent vegetative state."

What did she do that was so horrible? Unable to compete rhetorically with conservative blogger Jeff Goldstein, she repeatedly threatened the life of his two-year-old son with comments such as these:

I’d like to hear more about your “tyke” by the way. Girl? Boy? Toddler? Teen? Are you still married to the woman you ephed to give birth to the tyke?
Tell all, bro!



. . .

as I said elsewhere, if I woke up tomorrow and learned that someone else had shot you and your “tyke” it wouldn’t slow me down one iota. You aren’t “human” to me.

So if you could just tell me the AGE and SEX of your "tyke," I'd be stoked!
Thanx!

Ooh. Two year old boy. Sounds hot. You live in Colorado, I see. Hope no one Jon-Benets your baby.
. . .

If some nutcase kidnapped your child tomorrow and did to her what was done to your fellow Coloradan, Jon-Benet Ramsey, I wouldn’t give a damn.
According to Blackfive, (from whom I copied these comments) Goldstein's site is currently under two Denial of Service attacks. Froggy says:

Apparently, some elements of the psychotic left are closing ranks around Dr. Frisch and seemingly approve of her tactics of threatening children with death and sexual abuse. Nice going.
Those tactics did work so well for Stalin, Mao, Castro, and Che, so at least they're being consistent in their behavior.

When conservative bloggers go over the line and publish personal information, they are condemned by their own. When a liberal blogger threaten child sex abuse and murder, what response do we get from prominent liberal blogs?

Not one post.

Nothing from Kos, or Atrios, silence from Raw Story, AMERICAblog, and MyDD.

But two sites did write about how horrific personal attacks can be.

Glenn Greenwald found the time to condemn conservative bloggers who post personal contact information as a form of intimidation... yet he couldn't quite seem to find so much as a single word to condemn a fellow liberal who threatens the murder of a child.

Pamela Troy's front page post at the Democratic Underground found plenty of time to attack "aw-dropping right-wing venom," yet could spare no words for one of her own apparently advocating the sexual assault of a toddler.

Such sudden silence...

One might be tempted to think this absolute lack of condemnation was a tacit acceptance of these tactics.

Welcome to teh new face of teh most deranged members of our political opposition, "the toddler-threatening community."

Posted by Confederate Yankee at July 8, 2006 10:21 AM | TrackBack

Comments
The really odd thing is that this woman is, supposedly, a Ph.D. (or a candidate to become one). People in academia who share this sick worldview drove me to drop my Ph.D. aspirations early in my undergraduate carrer. A doctorate degree, or even a bachelor's degree, is becoming such a dirty mark on one's character.

Posted by: Eric in Atlanta at July 8, 2006 11:15 AM
Yes, but we are all forgetting a few things here.

1. Ms. Frisch is a college professor
2. Ms. Frisch has a PhD.
3. By definition Ms. Frisch is a superior human being to the rest of us poor, ignorant fools who must look to people like her for guidance and to be told how to think.

HOW is it my choice to how you react to something?
Just answer that simple question.
HOW is how YOU act MY choice?

You refuse to acknowledge that YOU control YOUR actions, and that IS immature.


Oh gee. He's going to repeat himself again.
There's a shocker....


Alias, I HAVE PROVEN MULTIPLE lies that you have said.
Predominantly, they are of the sort where YOU CLAIM I said something or believe something that I don't.
Like in the other thread when you made a claim about my position on slavery, which I NEVER SAID and I DO NOT HAVE that position.

That was a lie then, right?
If you claim I believe something or said something which is not true, then that's a lie.
Tell me you can comprehend at least that...